Skip to main content

Tree-Like Resolution Is Superpolynomially Slower Than DAG-Like Resolution for the Pigeonhole Principle

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1741))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Our main result shows that a shortest proof size of tree-like resolution for the pigeonhole principle is superpolynomially larger than that of DAG-like resolution. In the proof of a lower bound, we exploit a relationship between tree-like resolution and backtracking, which has long been recognized in this field but not been used before to give explicit results.

Supported in part by Scientific Research Grant, Ministry of Japan, 10558044, 09480055 and 10205215.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Beame and T. Pitassi, “Simplified and improved resolution lower bounds”, Proc. FOCS’96, pp. 274–282, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. L. Bonet, J. L. Esteban, N. Galesi and J. Johannsen, “Exponential separations between restricted resolution and cutting planes proof systems”, Proc. FOCS’98, pp. 638–647, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Buss, “Polynomial size proofs of the propositional pigeonhole principle”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 52, pp. 916–927, 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Buss and T. Pitassi, “Resolution and the weak pigeonhole principle”, Proc. CSL’97, LNCS 1414, pp.149–156, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. A. Cook and R. A. Reckhow, “The relative efficiency of propositional proof systems”, J. Symbolic Logic, 44(1), pp. 36–50, 1979.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Haken, “The intractability of resolution”, Theoretical Computer Science, 39, pp. 297–308, 1985.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Purdom, “A survey of average time analysis of satisfiability algorithms”, Journal of Information Processing, 13(4), pp.449–455, 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. A. Razborov, A. Wigderson and A. Yao, “Read-Once Branching programs, rectangular proofs of the pigeonhole principle and the transversal calculus”, Proc. STOC’97, pp. 739–748, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Urquhart, “The complexity of propositional proofs”, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 425–467, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Iwama, K., Miyazaki, S. (1999). Tree-Like Resolution Is Superpolynomially Slower Than DAG-Like Resolution for the Pigeonhole Principle. In: Algorithms and Computation. ISAAC 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1741. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46632-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46632-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66916-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46632-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics