Skip to main content

Issues of Decidability for Description Logics in the Framework of Resolution

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Deduction in Classical and Non-Classical Logics (FTP 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1761))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We describe two methods on the basis of which effcient resolution decision procedures can be developed for a range of description logics. The first method uses an ordering restriction and applies to the description logic \( \mathcal{A}\mathcal{L}\mathcal{B} \) , which extends \( \mathcal{A}\mathcal{L}\mathcal{C} \) with the top role, full role negation, role intersection, role disjunction, role converse, domain restriction, range restriction, and role hierarchies. The second method is based solely on a selection restriction and applies to reducts of \( \mathcal{A}\mathcal{L}\mathcal{B} \) without the top role and role negation. The latter method can be viewed as a polynomial simulation of familiar tableaux-based decision procedures. It can also be employed for automated model generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Baader, B. Hollunder, B. Nebel, H.-J. Profitlich, and E. Franconi. An empirical analysis of optimization techniques for terminological representation systems or “making KRIS get a move on”. Applied Intelligence, 4(2):109–132, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Baaz, C. Fermüller, and A. Leitsch. A non-elementary speed-up in proof length by structural clause form transformation. In Proc. LICS’94, pages 213–219. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Bachmair and H. Ganzinger. Ordered chaining calculi for first-order theories of binary relations. Research report MPI-I-95-2-009, Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany, 1995. To appear in J. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Bachmair and H. Ganzinger. A theory of resolution. Research report MPI-I-97-2-005, Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany, 1997. To appear in J. A. Robinson and A. Voronkov (eds.), Handbook of Automated Reasoning.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. de Nivelle. A resolution decision procedure for the guarded fragment. In Proc. CADE-15, LNAI 1421, pages 191–204. Springer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. M. Donini, M. Lenzerini, D. Nardi, and A. Schaerf. Deduction in concept languages: From subsumption to instance checking. J. Logic and Computation, 4:423–452, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Fermüller, A. Leitsch, T. Tammet, and N. Zamov. Resolution Method for the Decicion Problem. LNCS 679. Springer, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Ganzinger, U. Hustadt, C. Meyer, and R. A. Schmidt. A resolution-based decision procedure for extensions of K4. To appear in Advances in Modal Logic, Volume 2. CSLI Publications, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Hemaspaandra. The price of universality. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic, 37(2):174–203, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. I. Horrocks. Optimising Tableaux Decision Procedures for Description Logics. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U. Hustadt and R. A. Schmidt. On evaluating decision procedures for modal logic. In Proc. IJCAI’97, pages 202–207. Morgan Kaufmann, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. H. Joyner Jr. Resolution strategies as decision procedures. J. ACM, 23(3):398–417, 1976.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Kallick. A decision procedure based on the resolution method. In Information Processing 68, Volume 1, pages 269–275. North-Holland, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Marx. Mosaics and cylindric modal logic of dimension 2. In Advances in Modal Logic, Volume 1, Lecture Notes 87, pages 141–156. CSLI Publications, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Paramasivam and D. A. Plaisted. Automated deduction techniques for classification in description logic systems. J. Automated Reasoning, 20:337–364, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. D. A. Plaisted and S. Greenbaum. A structure-preserving clause form translation. J. Symbolic Computation, 2:293–304, 1986.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. R. A. Schmidt. Decidability by resolution for propositional modal logics. To appear in J. Automated Reasoning.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Schmidt-Schauß and G. Smolka. Attributive concept description with complements. Artifical Intelligence, 48:1–26, 1991.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. T. Tammet. Using resolution for extending KL-ONE-type languages. In Proc. CIKM’95, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Urquhart. The complexity of propositional proofs. Bull. Symbolic Logic, 1(4):425–467, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hustadt, U., Schmidt, R.A. (2000). Issues of Decidability for Description Logics in the Framework of Resolution. In: Caferra, R., Salzer, G. (eds) Automated Deduction in Classical and Non-Classical Logics. FTP 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1761. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46508-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46508-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67190-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46508-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics