Skip to main content

Optimistic vs. Pessimistic Interpretation of Linguistic Negation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications (AIMSA 2002)

Abstract

Linguistic negation processing is a challenging problem studied by a large number of researchers from different communities, i.e. logic, linguistics, etc.We are interested in finding the positive interpretations of a negative sentence represented as “x is notA”. In this paper, we do not focus on the single set of translations but on two approximation sets. The first one called pessimistic corresponds to the positive translations of the negative sentence that we can consider as sure. The second one called optimistic contains all the sentences that can be viewed as possible translations of the negative sentence. These approximation sets are computed according to the rough sets framework and based on a neighbourhood relation defined on the space of properties. Finally, we apply an original strategy of choice upon the two approximation sets which allows us to select the suitable translations of the initial negative sentence. It appears that we obtain results in good accordance with the ones linguistically expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Culioli, A.: Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation: Opérations et Représentations, Tome 1, Ophrys 2ds., Paris, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dermott D., “Tarskian Semantics, or no Notation Without denotation”, Cognitive Science 2(3), 277–282, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Desmontils, E., Pacholczyk, D.: Towards a linguistic processing of properties in declarative modelling, Int. Jour. CADCAM and Computer Graphics, 12:4, 351–371, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ducrot, O., Schaeffer J.-M.et al.: Nouveau dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage. Eds. du Seuil, Paris, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  5. Horn, L.R.: A Natural History of Negation. The University of Chicago Press, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCawley J. D., Everything That linguists Have always Wanted to Know about Logic (2nd ed.), Chicago Univ. Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mel'cuk I. A., Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice, Univ. of NewYork Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moore R. C., “Problems in logical Form” Proc. of the 19th Annual Meeting of Association for Computational Linguistics, Standford, California, 117–124, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Muller, C.: La négation en français, Publications romanes et françaises, Genève, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pacholczyk, D.: “An Intelligent System Dealing with Negative Information”. LNAI, 1325, 467–476, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pacholczyk, D.: “A New Approach to the Intended Meaning of Negative Information”, Proc. of ECAI’98, Brighton, UK, Pub. by J.Wileysamp;Sons, 114–118, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pacholczyk D.:A Fuzzy Analysis of Linguistic Negation of Nuanced Property in Knowledgebased Systems. Proc. of Int. Conf. ECSQARU-FAPR’97, LNAI. 1244, 451–465, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pacholczyk, D., Levrat, B.: Coping with Linguistically Denied Nuanced Properties: a Matter of Fuzziness and Scope, Proc. of 1998 IEEE ISIC/CIRA/ISAS joint Conf., Gaithersburg, MD, 1998, 753-758, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11 (1982), 341–356

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer, Netherlands, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pawlak, Z., et al: Rough Sets. Communication of the ACM, Vol. 38, No 11, 89–94, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pawlak, et al.: Rough sets: probabilistic versus deterministic. In B.R. Gaines and J.H. Boose Eds, Machine Learning and Uncertain Reasoning, 227–241. Academic Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Polkowski, L., Skowron, A.: Rough sets in Knowledge Discovery 1, 2. Physica-Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Quafafou, M.: Alpha-Rough set: A generalization of rough set theory, Information Sciences 124, 301–316., 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Ziarko W, Variable precision rough sets model, Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences, Vol 46, n° 1, 35–59, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Zubert R., Implications sémantiques dans les langues naturelles, Ed. du CNRS, Paris, France, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pacholczyk, D., Quafafou, M., Garcia, L. (2002). Optimistic vs. Pessimistic Interpretation of Linguistic Negation. In: Scott, D. (eds) Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications. AIMSA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2443. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46148-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46148-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44127-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46148-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics