Skip to main content

Erasure Coding Vs. Replication: A Quantitative Comparison

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2429))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Peer-to-peer systems are positioned to take advantage of gains in network bandwidth, storage capacity, and computational resources to provide long-term durable storage infrastructures. In this paper, we quantitatively compare building a distributed storage infrastructure that is self-repairing and resilient to faults using either a replicated system or an erasure-resilient system. We show that systems employing erasure codes have mean time to failures many orders of magnitude higher than replicated systems with similar storage and bandwidth requirements. More importantly, erasure-resilient systems use an order of magnitude less bandwidth and storage to provide similar system durability as replicated systems.

Data is periodically repaired to replace lost redundancy in both replicated and erasure encoded systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ANDERSON, R. The eternity service. In Proceedings of Pragocrypt (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. BOLOSKY, W., DOUCEUR, J., ELY, D., AND THEIMER, M. Feasibility of a serverless distributed file system deployed on an existing set of desktop PCs. In Proc. of Sigmetrics (June 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. CHEN, Y., EDLER, J., GOLDBERG, A., GOTTLIEB, A., SOBTI, S., AND YIANILOS, P. Prototype implementation of archival intermemory. In Proc. of IEEE ICDE (Feb. 1996), pp. 485–495.

    Google Scholar 

  4. CLARK, I., SANDBERG, O., WILEY, B., AND HONG, T. Freenet: A distributed anonymous information storage and retrieval system. In Proc. of the Workshop on Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability (Berkeley, CA, July 2000), pp. 311–320.

    Google Scholar 

  5. DABEK, F., KAASHOEK, M. F., KARGER, D., MORRIS, R., AND STOICA, I. Wide-area cooperative storage with CFS. In Proc. of ACM SOSP (October 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  6. DINGLEDINE, R., FREEDMAN, M., AND MOLNAR, D. The freehaven project: Distributed anonymous storage service. In Proc. of the Workshop on Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability (July 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  7. DRUSCHEL, P., AND ROWSTRON, A. Storage management and caching in PAST, a largescale, persistent peer-to-peer storage utility. In Proc. of ACM SOSP (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. KUBIATOWICZ, J., ET AL. Oceanstore: An architecture for global-scale persistent storage. In Proc. of ASPLOS (Nov. 2000), ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  9. PATTERSON, D., GIBSON, G., AND KATZ, R. The case for raid: Redundant arrays of inexpensive disks, May 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. PATTERSON, D., AND HENNESSY, J. Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach. Forthcoming Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  11. RATNASAMY, S., FRANCIS, P., HANDLEY, M., KARP, R., AND SCHENKER, S. A scalable content-addressable network. In Proceedings of SIGCOMM (August 2001), ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  12. RHEA, S., WELLS, C., EATON, P., GEELS, D., ZHAO, B., WEATHERSPOON, H., AND KUBIATOWICZ, J. Maintenance free global storage in oceanstore. In Proc. of IEEE Internet Computing (2001), IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  13. STOICA, I., MORRIS, R., KARGER, D., KAASHOEK, M. F., AND BALAKRISHNAN, H. Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications. In Proceedings of SIGCOMM (August 2001), ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  14. ZHAO, B., JOSEPH, A., AND KUBIATOWICZ, J. Tapestry: An infrastructure for fault-tolerant wide-area location and routing. Tech. Rep. UCB//CSD-01-1141, University of California, Berkeley Computer Science Division, April 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weatherspoon, H., Kubiatowicz, J.D. (2002). Erasure Coding Vs. Replication: A Quantitative Comparison. In: Druschel, P., Kaashoek, F., Rowstron, A. (eds) Peer-to-Peer Systems. IPTPS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2429. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45748-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45748-8_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44179-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45748-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics