Skip to main content

A MAX-MIN Ant System for the University Course Timetabling Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ant Algorithms (ANTS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2463))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider a simplification of a typical university course timetabling problem involving three types of hard and three types of soft constraints. A MAX-MIN Ant System, which makes use of a separate local search routine, is proposed for tackling this problem. We devise an appropriate construction graph and pheromone matrix representation after considering alternatives. The resulting algorithm is tested over a set of eleven instances from three classes of the problem. The results demonstrate that the ant system is able to construct significantly better timetables than an algorithm that iterates the local search procedure from random starting solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Blum, M. Dorigo, S. Correia, O. Rossi-Doria, B. Paechter, and M. Snoek. A GA evolving instructions for a timetable builder. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (PATAT 2002 ) (to appear), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Bonabeau, M. Dorigo, and G. Theraulaz. From Natural to Artificial Swarm Intelligence. Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. K. Burke, J. P. Newall, and R. F. Weare. A memetic algorithm for university exam timetabling. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (PATAT 1995), LNCS 1153, pages 241–251. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. J. Conover. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, 3rd edition, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. B. Cooper and J. H. Kingston. The complexity of timetable construction problems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (PATAT 1995), LNCS 1153, pages 283–295. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Corne, P. Ross, and H.-L. Fang. Evolutionary timetabling: Practice, prospects and workin progress. In Proceedings of the UK Planning and Scheduling SIG Workshop, Strathclyde, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Cowling, G. Kendall, and E. Soubeiga. A hyperheuristic approach to scheduling a sales summit. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (PATAT 2000), LNCS 2079, pages 176–190. Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Costa and A. Hertz. Ants can colour graphs. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48:295–305, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. D. de Werra. The combinatorics of timetabling. European Journal of Operational Research, 96:504–513, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Dorigo and G. Di Caro. The Ant Colony Optimization meta-heuristic. In D. Corne, M. Dorigo, and F. Glover, editors, New Ideas in Optimization. McGraw-Hill, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Dorigo, G. Di Caro, and L. M. Gambardella. Ant algorithms for discrete optimization. Artificial Life, 5:137–172, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Dorigo, V. Maniezzo, and A. Colorni. The Ant System: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 26:29–41, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. A. S. Elmohamed, P. Coddington, and G. Fox. A comparison of annealing techniques for academic course scheduling. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (PATAT 1997), pages 92–115, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. D. Gaspero and A. Schaerf. Tabu search techniques for examination timetabling. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (PATAT 2000), LNCS 2079, pages 104–117. Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Paechter. Course timetabling. Evonet Summer School, 2001. http://evonet.dcs.napier.ac.uk/summerschool2001/problems.html.

  16. B. Paechter, R. C. Rankin, A. Cumming, and T. C. Fogarty. Timetabling the classes of an entire university with an evolutionary algorithm. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN V), LNCS 1498, pages 865–874. Springer-Verlag, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Roli, C. Blum, and M. Dorigo. ACO for maximal constraint satisfaction problems. In Proceedings of the 4th Metaheuristics International Conference (MIC 2001), volume 1, pages 187–191, Porto, Portugal, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. O. Rossi-Doria, C. Blum, J. Knowles, M. Sampels, K. Socha, and B. Paechter. A local search for the timetabling problem. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (PATAT 2002 ) (to appear), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O. Rossi-Doria, M. Sampels, M. Chiarandini, J. Knowles, M. Manfrin, M. Mastrolilli, L. Paquete, and B. Paechter. A comparison of the performance of different metaheuristics on the timetabling problem. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (PATAT 2002 ) (to appear), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Stützle and H. H. Hoos. MAX-MIN Ant System. Future Generation Computer Systems, 16(8):889–914, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H. M. M. ten Eikelder and R. J. Willemen. Some complexity aspects of secondary school timetabling problems. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (PATAT 2000), LNCS 2079, pages 18–29. Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Socha, K., Knowles, J., Sampels, M. (2002). A MAX-MIN Ant System for the University Course Timetabling Problem. In: Dorigo, M., Di Caro, G., Sampels, M. (eds) Ant Algorithms. ANTS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2463. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45724-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45724-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44146-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45724-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics