Skip to main content

Widening the Scope of Software Product Lines — From Variation to Composition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Product Lines (SPLC 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2379))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Architecture, components and reuse form the key elements to build a large variety of complex, high-quality products with a short lead-time. But the balance between an architecture-driven and a component-driven approach is influenced by the scope of the product line and the characteristics of the development organization. This paper discusses that balance and claims that a paradigm shift from variation to composition is necessary to cope with an increasing diversity of products created by an ever-larger part of an organization. We illustrate our claim with various examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Felix Bachmann, Len Bass, Introduction to the Architecture Based Design Method, Tutorial at the First Software Product Line Conference (SPLC1), August 28–31, 2000, Denver, Colorado, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Don Batory, Sean O’Malley, The Design and Implementation of Hierarchical Software Systems with Reusable Components, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 1 no. 4, pp. 355–398 (October 1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Joe Bauman, The Perfect Architecture is non-optimal, Winning with Chaos, Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Product Family Engineering, Bilbao, Spain, October 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jan Bosch, Organizing for Software Product Lines, Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on the development and evolution of software architectures of product families, Las Palmas, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klaas Brink, Interfacing Control and Software Engineering: a formal approach, PhD thesis, Technical University, Delft, The Netherlands, June 24, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kraig Brockschmidt, Inside OLE Second Edition, 1995, Microsoft Press, ISBN 1-55615-843-2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frederick P. Brooks Jr, The Mythical Man-Month, Essays on Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ISBN 0-201-00650-2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paul Clements, Linda Northrop, Software Product Lines, Practices and Patterns, Addison-Wesley, 2002, ISBN 0-201-70332-7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krzysztof Czarnecki, Ulrich Eisenecker, Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications, Addison-Wesley Pub Co; ISBN: 0-201-30977-7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. David Garlan, Robert Allen, John Ockerbloom, Architectural Mismatch, or: Why it’s hard to build systems out of existing parts, ICSE 95, Seattle, Washington USA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richard C. Holt, Structural Manipulations of Software Architecture using Tarski Relational Algebra, Proceedings of fifth Working Conference of Reverse Engineering, WCRE’98, IEEE Computer Society, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software Incentive Systems, http://standards.ieee.org/catalog/olis/se.html

  13. Ivar Jacobson, Martin Griss, Patrick Jonsson, Software Reuse-Architecture, Process and Organization for Business Success, Addison Wesley, New York, 1997, ISBN 0-201-92476-5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frank van der Linden, Jan Gerben Wijnstra, Platform Engineering for the Medical Domain, Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Product Family Engineering, Bilbao, Spain, October 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jeff Magee, Naranker Dulay, Susan Eisenbach, Jeff Kramer, Specifying Distributed Software Architectures, Proc. ESEC’95, Wilhelm Schafer, Pere Botella (Eds.) Springer LNCS 989 pp. 137–153 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. D. McIlroy, Mass produced software components, Proc. Nato Software Eng. Conf., Garmisch, Germany (1968) 138–155.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Microsoft DirectShow, http://www.gdcl.co.uk/dshow.htm, part of DirectX.

  18. Microsoft, Shell Programmers Guide, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/

  19. National Instruments, LabView, http://www.natinst.com/labview/

  20. Rob van Ommering, Frank van der Linden, Jeff Kramer, Jeff Magee, The Koala Component Model for Consumer Electronics Software, IEEE Computer, March 2000, p78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rob van Ommering, Beyond Product Families: Building a Product Population?, Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on the development and evolution of software architectures of product families, Las Palmas, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rob van Ommering, Roadmapping a Product Population Architecture, 4th International Workshop on Product Family Engineering, Bilbao, Spain, October 3–5, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rob van Ommering, René Krikhaar, Loe Feijs, Language for Formalizing, Visualizing and Verifying Software Architectures, Computer Languages 27 (2001) p3–18.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. David L. Parnas, On the Criteria to Be Used in Decomposing Systems into Modules, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 15, No. 12, December 1972, p1053–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dewayne E. Perry, Generic Architecture Descriptions for Product Lines, Proceedings of the Second International ESPRIT ARES Workshop, LNCS 1429, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1998, p51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jeff Prosise, Programming Windows 95 with MFC, Microsoft Press, 1996, ISBN 1-55615-902-1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dale Rogerson, Inside COM, Microsoft’s Component Object Model, Microsoft Press, ISBN 1-57231-349-8, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mary Shaw, David Garlan, Software Architecture, Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline, Prentice Hall, 1996, ISBN 0-13-182957-2.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Clemens A. Szyperski, Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley, Harlow, UK, 1998, ISBN 0-201-17888-5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. The Trimedia Streaming Software Architecture, http://www.trimedia.com/products/briefs/tssa.html

  31. Kurt Wallnau, Scott Hissam, Robert Seacord, Building Systems from Commercial Components, Addison-Wesley Pub Co; ISBN: 0-201-70064-6

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jan Gerben Wijnstra, Supporting Diversity with Component Frameworks as Architectural Elements, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Limerick, June 4–11, 2000, p. 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tony Williams, On Inheritance, What It Means and How To Use It, Microsoft Internal Report, 1990, http://research.microsoft.com/comapps/docs/Inherit.doc

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Ommering, R., Bosch, J. (2002). Widening the Scope of Software Product Lines — From Variation to Composition. In: Chastek, G.J. (eds) Software Product Lines. SPLC 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2379. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45652-X_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45652-X_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43985-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45652-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics