Skip to main content

An Abductive Approach for Analysing Event-Based Requirements Specifications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic Programming (ICLP 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2401))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a logic and logic programming based approach for analysing event-based requirements specifications given in terms of a system’s reaction to events and safety properties. The approach uses a variant of Kowalski and Sergot’s Event Calculus to represent such specifications declaratively and an abductive reasoning mechanism for analysing safety properties. Given a system description and a safety property, the abductive mechanism is able to identify a complete set of counterexamples (if any exist) of the property in terms of symbolic “current” states and associated event-based transitions. A case study of an automobile cruise control system specified in the SCR framework is used to illustrate our approach. The technique described is implemented using existing tools for abductive logic programming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alspaugh, T. et al. (1988). Software Requirements for the A-7E Aircraft. Naval Research Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, R., et al. (1996). Model Checking Large Software Specifications. ACM Proc. of 4th Int. Symp. on the Foundation of Software Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atlee, J. M., and Gannon, J. (1993). State-Based Model Checking of Event-Driven System Requirements. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 19(1): 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bharadwaj, R., and Heitmeyer, C. (1997). Model Checking Complete Requirements Specifications Using Abstraction. Technical Report No. NRL-7999, NRL.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bharadwaj, R., and Sims, S. (2000). Salsa: Combining Solvers with BDDs for Automated Invariant Checking. Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, Lecture Notes in CS, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke, M., and Wing, M. (1996). Formal Methods, State of the Art and Future Directions. ACM Computing Survey, 28(4): 626–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Easterbrook, S., and Callahan, J. (1997). Formal Methods for Verification and Validation of Partial Specifications. Journal of Systems and Software.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilb, T., and Graham, D. (1993). Software Inspection. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heitmeyer, C. L., Labaw, B., and Kiskis, D. (1995). Consistency Checking of SCR-style Requirements Specifications. Proc. of 2nd Int. Symp. on Requirements Engineering, York, 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heitmeyer, C. L., Jeffords, R. D., and Labaw, B. G. (1996). Automated Consistency Checking of Requirements Specifications. ACM Transaction of Software Engineering and Methodology, 5(3): 231–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heitmeyer, C. L., et al. (1998). Using Abstraction and Model Checking to Detect Safety Violations in Requirements Specifications. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 24(11): 927–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holzmann, G. J. (1997). The Model Checker SPIN. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 23(5): 279–295.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kakas, A. C., and Mancarella, P. (1990). Generalised Stable Models: A Semantics for Abduction. ECAI’90, Stockholm, pages 385–391.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kakas, A. C., and Michael, A. (1995). Integrating Abductive and Constraint Logic Programming. Proc. of 12th Int. Conf. on Logic Programming, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kakas, A. C., and Miller R. (1997). A Simple Declarative Language for Describing Narratives with Actions. Journal of Logic Programming, Special issue on Reasoning about Actions and Events, 31(1–3): 157–200.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kakas, A. C., Kowalski, R. A., and Toni, F. (1998). The Role of Abduction in Logic Programming. In C. J. Hogger, J. A. Robinson D. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming (235–324). OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kowalski, R. A., and Sergot, M. J. (1986). A Logic-Based Calculus of Events. New Generation Computing, 4: 67–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Magee, J., and Kramer, J. (1999). Concurrency: State Models and Java Programs. John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McMillian, K. L. (1993). Symbolic Model Checking. Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Menzies, T. (1996). Applications of Abduction: Knowledge Level Modeling. International Journal of Human Computer Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller, R. (1997) Deductive and Abductive Planning in the Event Calculus. Poc. 2nd AISB Workshop on Practical Reasoning and Rationality, Manchester, U. K.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miller, R., and Shanahan, M. (1999). The Event Calculus in Classical Logic. Linkoping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science, 4(16).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, S. (1998). Specifying the mode logic of a Flitght Guidance System in CoRE and SCR. Proceedings of 2nd Workshop of Formal Methods in Software Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Owre, S., et al. (1995). Formal verification for fault-tolerant architecture: Prolegomena to the design of PVS. IEEE Transactions on S.E, 21(2): 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parnas, D. L., and Madey, J. (1995). Functional Documentation for Computer Systems. Technical Report No. CRL 309, McMaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Russo, A., Miller, R., Nuseibeh, B., and Kramer, J. (2001). An Abductive Approach for Analysing Event-based Specifications. Technical Report no. 2001/7, Imperial College.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Satoh, K. (1998). Computing Minimal Revised Logical Specification by Abduction. Proc. of Int. Workshop on the Principles of Software Evolution, 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  28. van Lamsweerde, A., Darimont, R., and Letier, E. (1998). Managing Conflicts in Goal-Driven Requirement Engineering. IEEE Transactions on S. E.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Russo, A., Miller, R., Nuseibeh, B., Kramer, J. (2002). An Abductive Approach for Analysing Event-Based Requirements Specifications. In: Stuckey, P.J. (eds) Logic Programming. ICLP 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2401. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45619-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45619-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43930-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45619-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics