Abstract
Low to moderate speed collision between elastic-plastic bodies results in imperceptible permanent indentation of the contact surfaces if the bodies are hard. Nevertheless in these collisions the contact force-indentation relation is irreversible since internal energy gained from work done by the contact force during the compression is partially trapped in elastic waves, work done in plastic deformation and work done to overcome friction during sliding. These sources of kinetic energy loss in collisions depend on relative velocity between the bodies at the contact point, material properties, inertia properties related to the impact configuration and geometric constraints on the deformation field.
Colliding bodies that can be represented as elastic-plastic or visco-plastic solids have been analyzed using specific models of contact compliance to calculate the energy transformed into irrecoverable forms. These calculations show how elastic waves, plastic deformation and friction affect the energetic coefficient of restitution—a coefficient that is a measure of impact energy loss from internal sources. The calculations indicate that there is considerable difference in the sources of energy loss for 2D and 3D deformations. Also, that friction little affects the plastic energy losses unless the impact speed is large enough to cause uncontained plastic deformation beneath the contact area. Consequently, for low-speed impact \( \rho v_3^2 \left( 0 \right)/Y < 10^{ - 3} \) , the energetic coefficient of friction e*. is insensitive to friction.
In analysing impact of multi-body systems (e.g. mechanisms, kinematic chains or agglomerates of granules), it is crucial to employ these ideas by specifically modelling the contact compliance. During impact on a mechanism, the velocity changes in one area of contact induce small displacements that develop at other compliant contacts where the impacted body is supported or connected to other elements; the force that develops at these secondary contacts (as a consequence of relative displacement at each individual contact) is the means of transmitting the impact process through system. Although the global compliance of elements of the system may be small enough so that vibration energy is negligible, the dynamics of multi-body collisions requires consideration of local compliance in each contact regions.
Previously impact on a system of interconnected bodies has been analyzed as either a sequence of separate collisions or a set of simultaneous collisions. In general neither of these assumptions gives an accurate representation of the dynamic behaviour of multi-body systems. Rather, it is necessary to model the compliance of each contact and consider the contact forces which develop since it is these forces which prevent interpenetration or overlap. When applied to impact on multi-body systems such as mechanisms, the impulsemomentum methods used in rigid body dynamics give but one limit of the range of response - a range that depends on the distribution of local compliance at each contact between bodies in the system. An accurate analysis of multi-body system response to impact generally requires consideration of the time-dependent contact forces in a wave of reaction that propagates away from the initial site of impact.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
H. Deresiewicz, “A note on Hertz’s theory of impact”, ACTA Mechanica 6, 110.
Y. Wang & M.T. Mason, “Two-dimensional rigid-body collisions with friction,” ASME J. Appl. Mech. 59, 635–642.
W.J. Stronge, “Two-dimensional rigid-body collisions with friction—Discussion,” ASME J. Appl. Mech. 60, 564–566 (1993).
W.J. Stronge, “Rigid body collisions with friction,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A431, 169–181 (1990).
H. Hertz, “Uber die beruhhrung fester elastischer korper”, J. Reine und Angewundte Mathematik 92, 156–171.
S. Timoshenko & N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill, New York (1970).
K.L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 1985.
W.J. Stronge, “Theoretical coefficient of friction for planar impact of rough elastoplastic bodies,” Impact, Waves and Fracture, ASME AMD-205 (ed. R.C. Batra, A.K. Mal and G.P. MacSithigh) 351–362 (1995).
D. Tabor, The Hardness of Metals, Oxford University Press, UK, pp. 128–138 (1951).
D. Tabor, “A simple theory of static and dynamic hardness,” Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. A192, 247–274 (1948).
W.J. Stronge, Impact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
C. Hardy, C.N. Baronet & G.V. Tordion, “Elastoplastic indentation of a half-space by a rigid sphere”, J. Num. Methods in Engineering 3, 451 (1971).
C.T. Lim & W.J. Stronge, “Oblique elastic-plastic impact between rough cylinders in plane strain,” Int. J. Engr. Sci 37, 97–122 (1998).
G.G. Adams, “The coefficient of restitution for a planar two-body eccentric impact,” J. Appl. Mech. 60, 1058–1060 (1993).
W. Goldsmith, Impact: the Theory and Physical Behaviour of Colliding Solids, Edward Arnold Pub. London (1960).
K.L. Johnson, “The bounce of’ superball’,” Int. J. Mechanical Engng Education 111, 57–63 (1983).
N. Maw, J.R. Barber & J.N. Fawcett, “The role of elastic tangential compliance in oblique impact”, ASME J. Lub. Technology 103(74), 74–80 (1981).
W.J. Stronge, “Planar impact of rough compliant bodies,” Int. J. Impact Engng. 15, 435–450.
A.D. Lewis & R.J. Rodgers, “Experimental and numerical study of forces during oblique impact”, J. Sound & Vibration 125(3), 403–412 (1988).
J. Wittenburg Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies, B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart (1977).
Glockner, Ch. and Pfeiffer, F. (1995) “Multiple impacts with friction in rigid multibody systems”, Advances in Nonlinear Dynamics (ed. A.K. Bajaj & S.W. Shaw), Kluwer Academic Pub.
M.S. Pereira and P. Nikravesh, “Impact dynamics of nultibody systems with frictional contact using joint coordinates and canonical equations of motion”, Nonlinear Dynamics 9, 53–71 (1996).
W. Johnson, “’simple’ linear impact”, Int J. Mech. Engng. Ed. 4, 167–181 (1976).
Y. Hurmuzlu and D.B. Marghitu, “Rigid body collisions of planar kinematic chains with multiple contact points”, Int. J. Robotics Research 13, 82–92 (1994).
A.P. Ivanov, “On multiple impact”, Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 59(6), 887–902 (1995).
J.J. Moreau, “Standard inelastic shocks and the dynamics of unilateral constraints”’ CISM courses and lectures, no 288, Springer-Verlag, 173–221.
W.J. Stronge, “Mechanics of impact for compliant multi-body systems”, IUTAM Symp. on Unilateral Multibody Dynamics (ed. Glockner, Ch. and Pfeiffer, F.), Munich (1998).
P.A. Cundall and O.D.L. Strack, “A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies”, Geotechnique 29, 47–65.
H.M. Lankarani & P.E. Nikravesh, “Contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multibody systems”, ASME J. Mech Design 112, 360–376 (1990).
Y.T. Wang, V. Kumar & J. Abel, “Dynamics of rigid bodies with multiple frictional contacts”, Proceedings IEEE Int’l Conf. on Robotics and Automation II, 442–448 (1992).
R. Singh, A. Shukla & H. Zervas, “Explosively generated pulse propagation through particles containing natural cracks”, Mechanics of Materials 23, 255–270 (1996).
A.P. Ivanov and T.V. Lavina, “On the problem of collinear triple collision”, Proceedings of EUROMECH 397, Grenoble (1999).
B. Brogliato, Nonsmooth Impact Mechanics: Models, Dynamics and Control, Springer-Verlag LNCIS 220 (1996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stronge, W. (2000). Contact Problems for Elasto-Plastic Impact in Multi-Body Systems. In: Brogliato, B. (eds) Impacts in Mechanical Systems. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 551. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45501-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45501-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67523-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45501-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive