Skip to main content

TCTL Inevitability Analysis of Dense-Time Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Implementation and Application of Automata (CIAA 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2759))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Inevitability properties in branching temporal logics are of the syntax ∀◊φ, where φ is an arbitrary (timed) CTL formula. Such inevitability properties in dense-time logics can be analyzed with greatest fixpoint calculation. We present algorithms to model-check inevitability properties both with and without non-Zeno computation requirement. We discuss a technique for early decision on greatest fixpoint calculation. Our algorithms come with a d-parameter for the measurement of time-progress. We have experimented with various issues, which may affect the performance of TCTL inevitability analysis. Specifically, we report the performance of our implementation w.r.t. various d-parameter values and with or without the non-Zeno computation requirement in the evaluation of greatest fixpoints. We have also experimented with safe abstration techniques for model-checking TCTL inevitability properties. Analysis of experiment data helps clarify how various techniques can be used to improve verification of inevitability properties.

The work is partially supported by NSC, Taiwan, ROC under grants NSC 90-2213-E-002-131, NSC 90-2213-E-002-132, and by the Internet protocol verification project of the Institute of Applied Science & Engineering Research, Academia Sinica, 2001.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Alur, C. Courcoubetis, D.L. Dill. Model Checking for Real-Time Systems, IEEE LICS, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Alur, D. L. Dill. Automata for modelling real-time systems. ICALP’ 1990, LNCS 443, Springer-Verlag, pp.322–335.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Alpern, F.B. Schneider. Defining Liveness. Information Processing Letters 21,4 (October 1985), 181–185.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Balarin. Approximate Reachability Analysis of Timed Automata. IEEE RTSS, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Behrmann, K. G. Larsen, J. Pearson, C. Weise, Wang Yi. Efficient Timed Reachability Analysis Using Clock Difference Diagrams. CAV’99, July, Trento, Italy, LNCS 1633, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Cousot, R. Cousot. Abstract Interpretation and application to logic programs. Journal of Logic Programming, 13(2–3):103–179, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Clarke, E.A. Emerson, A.P. Sistla. Automatic Verification of Finite-State Concurrent Systems using Temporal-Logic Specifications, ACM Trans. Programming, Languages, and Systems, 8, Nr. 2, pp. 244–263.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Clarke, O. Grumberg, S. Jha, Y. Lu, H. Veith. Counterexample-guided Abstraction Refinement. CAV’2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.L. Dill. Timing Assumptions and Verification of Finite-state Concurrent Systems. CAV’89, LNCS 407, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Daws, A. Olivero, S. Tripakis, S. Yovine. The tool KRONOS. The 3rd Hybrid Systems, 1996, LNCS 1066, Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. E.A. Emerson. Uniform Inevitability is tree automataon ineffable. Information Processing Letters 24(2), Jan 1987, pp.77–79.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. T.A. Henzinger, X. Nicollin, J. Sifakis, S. Yovine. Symbolic Model Checking for Real-Time Systems, IEEE LICS 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P.-A. Hsiung, F. Wang. User-Friendly Verification. Proceedings of 1999 FORTE/PSTV, October, 1999, Beijing. Formal Methods for Protocol Engineering and Distributed Systems, editors: J. Wu, S.T. Chanson, Q. Gao; Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Laroussinie, K. G. Larsen. CMC: A Tool for Compositional Model-Checking of Real-Time Systems. FORTE/PSTV’98, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K.G. Larsen, F. Larsson, P. Pettersson, Y. Wang. Efficient Verification of Real-Time Systems: Compact Data-Structure and State-Space Reduction. IEEE RTSS, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Moller, J. Lichtenberg, H.R. Andersen, H. Hulgaard. Difference Decision Diagrams, in proceedings of Annual Conference of the European Association for Computer Science Logic (CSL), Sept. 1999, Madreid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Manna, A. Pnueli. Temporal Verification of Reactive Systems: Safety. Springer-Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.O. Moller. Parking Can Get You There Faster — Model Augmentation to Speed up Real-Time Model Checking. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 65(6), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A.W. Mazurkiewicz, E. Ochmanski, W. Penczek. Concurrent Systems and Inevitability. TCS 64(3): 281–304, 1989.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Pettersson, K. G. Larsen, UPPAAL2k. in Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science, volume 70, pages 40–44, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Pnueli, The Temporal Logic of Programs, 18th annual IEEE-CS Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 45–57, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Wang. Efficient Data-Structure for Fully Symbolic Verification of Real-Time Software Systems. TACAS’2000, March, Berlin, Germany. in LNCS 1785, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. Wang. Region Encoding Diagram for Fully Symbolic Verification of Real-Time Systems. the 24th COMPSAC, Oct. 2000, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, IEEE press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Wang. RED: Model-checker for Timed Automata with Clock-Restriction Diagram. Workshop on Real-Time Tools, Aug. 2001, Technical Report 2001-014, ISSN 1404-3203, Dept. of Information Technology, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Wang. Symbolic Verification of Complex Real-Time Systems with Clock-Restriction Diagram, Proceedings of FORTE, August 2001, Cheju Island, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  26. F. Wang. Efficient Verification of Timed Automata with BDD-like Data-Structures. proceedings of VMCAI’2003, LNCS 2575, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  27. F. Wang, P.-A. Hsiung. Automatic Verification on the Large. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE HASE, November 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. Wang, P.-A. Hsiung. Efficient and User-Friendly Verification. IEEE Transactions on Computers, Jan. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. F. Wang, G.-D. Hwang, F. Yu. Symbolic Simulation of Real-Time Concurrent Systems. to appear in proceedings of RTCSA’2003, Feb. 2003, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.

    Google Scholar 

  30. H. Wong-Toi. Symbolic Approximations for Verifying Real-Time Systems. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. Yovine. Kronos: A Verification Tool for Real-Time Systems. International Journal of Software Tools for Technology Transfer, Vol. 1, Nr. 1/2, October 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, F., Hwang, GD., Yu, F. (2003). TCTL Inevitability Analysis of Dense-Time Systems. In: Ibarra, O.H., Dang, Z. (eds) Implementation and Application of Automata. CIAA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2759. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45089-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45089-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40561-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45089-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics