Abstract
In this paper we analyze several models of 1-way quantum finite automata, in the light of formal power series theory. In this general context, we recall two well known constructions, by proving:
-
1.
Languages generated with isolated cut-point by a class of bounded rational formal series are regular.
-
2.
If a class of formal series is closed under f-complement, Hadamard product and convex linear combination, then the class of languages generated with isolated cut-point is closed under boolean operations.
We introduce a general model of 1-way quantum automata and we compare their behaviors with those of measure-once, measure-many and reversible 1-way quantum automata.
Partially supported by MURST, under the project “Linguaggi formali: teoria ed applicazioni”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. Ambainis and R. Freivalds. 1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknesses and generalizations. In Proc. 39th Symposium on Foundations of Computer. Science, pp. 332–342, 1998.
A. Ambainis, A. Kikusts, and M. Valdats. On the class of languages recognizable by 1-way quantum finite automata. In Proc. 18th Annual Symposium on Theoretical. Aspects of Computer Science, LNCS 2010, Springer, pp. 305–316, 2001. Also as Technical Report quant-ph/0001005.
L. Baldi and G. Cerofolini. La Legge di Moore e lo sviluppo dei circuiti integrati. Mondo Digitale, 3:3–15, 2002 (in Italian).
P. Benioff. Quantum mechanical Hamiltonian models of Turing machines. J. Stat. Phys., 29:515–546, 1982.
J. Berstel and C. Reutenauer. Rational series and their languages. EATCS Monographs on Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 12, Springer-Verlag, 1988.
A. Bertoni and M. Carpentieri. Regular languages accepted by quantum automata. Information and Computation, 165:174–182, 2001.
A. Bertoni and M. Carpentieri. Analogies and differences between quantum and stochastic automata. Theoretical Computer Science, 262:69–81, 2001.
A. Brodsky and N. Pippenger. Characterizations of 1-way quantum finite automata. Technical Report TR-99-03, Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, 2000.
E. Bernstein and U. Vazirani. Quantum complexity theory. SIAM J. Comput., 26:1411–1473, 1997. A preliminary version appeared in Proc. 25th ACM Symp. on. Theory of Computation, pp. 11-20, 1993.
D. Deutsch. Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A, 400:97–117, 1985.
R. Feynman. Simulating physics with computers. Int. J. Theoretical Physics, 21:467–488, 1982.
M. Golovkins and M. Kravtsev. Probabilistic Reversible Automata and Quantum Automata. In Proc. 8th International Computing and Combinatorics Conference, LNCS 2387, Springer, pp. 574–583, 2002
L. Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proc. 28th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 212–219, 1996.
J. Gruska. Quantum Computing. McGraw-Hill, 1999.
J. Gruska. Descriptional complexity issues in quantum computing. J. Automata, Languages and Combinatorics, 5:191–218, 2000.
W. Höffdings. Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. J. American Statistical Association, 58:13–30, 1963.
A. Kondacs and J. Watrous. On the power of quantum finite state automata. In 38th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 66–75, 1997.
M. Marcus and H. Minc. Introduction to Linear Algebra. The Macmillan Company, 1965. Reprinted by Dover, 1988.
M. Marcus and H. Minc. A Survey of Matrix Theory and Matrix Inequalities. Prindle, Weber & Schmidt, 1964. Reprinted by Dover, 1992.
G.E. Moore. Progress in Digital Integrated Electronics. In Digest of the 1975. International Electron Devices Meeting, IEEE, pp. 11–13, 1975.
C. Moore and J. Crutchfield. Quantum automata and quantum grammars. Theoretical. Computer Science, 237:275–306, 2000. A preliminary version of this work appears as Technical Report in 1997.
A. Nayak. Optimal lower bounds for quantum automata and random access codes. In Proc. 40th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. pp. 369–376, 1999.
A. Paz. Introduction to Probabilistic Automata. Academic Press, 1971.
J.E. Pin. On languages accepted by finite reversible automata. In Proc. 14th. International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, LNCS 267, pp. 237–249. Springer-Verlag, 1987.
M. Rabin. Probabilistic automata. Information and Control, 6:230–245, 1963.
P. Shor. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26:1484–1509, 1997. A preliminary version appeared in Proc. 35th IEEE Symp. on Foundations. of Computer Science, pp. 20–22, 1994.
M.P. Schützenberger. On the definition of a family of automata. Information and. Control, 4:245–270, 1961.
A. Salomaa and M. Soittola. Automata-theoretic aspects of formal power series. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 1978.
P. Turakainen. Generalized automata and stochastic languages. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 21:303–309, 1969.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bertoni, A., Mereghetti, C., Palano, B. (2003). Quantum Computing: 1-Way Quantum Automata. In: Ésik, Z., Fülöp, Z. (eds) Developments in Language Theory. DLT 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2710. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45007-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45007-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40434-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45007-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive