Skip to main content

Theory Completion Using Inverse Entailment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1866))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The main real-world applications of Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) to date involve the “Observation Predicate Learning” (OPL) assumption, in which both the examples and hypotheses define the same predicate. However, in both scientific discovery and language learning potential applications exist in which OPL does not hold. OPL is ingrained within the theory and performance testing of Machine Learning. A general ILP technique called “Theory Completion using Inverse Entailment” (TCIE) is introduced which is applicable to non-OPL applications. TCIE is based on inverse entailment and is closely allied to abductive inference. The implementation of TCIE within Progol5.0 is described. The implementation uses contra-positives in a similar way to Stickel’s Prolog Technology Theorem Prover. Progol5.0 is tested on two different data-sets. The first dataset involves a grammar which translates numbers to their representation in English. The second dataset involves hypothesising the function of unknown genes within a network of metabolic pathways. On both datasets near complete recovery of performance is achieved after relearning when randomly chosen portions of background knowledge are removed. Progol5.0’s running times for experiments in this paper were typically under 6 seconds on a standard laptop PC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Ade, L. De Raedt, and M. Bruynooghe. Theory revision. In S. Muggleton, editor, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, pages 179–192, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Dimopoulos and A. Kakas. Abduction and inductive learning. In L. De Raedt, editor, Proceedings of the Fifth Inductive Logic Programming Workshop (ILP9), pages 25–28, Leuven, Belgium, 1995. KU Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Dujon. The yeast genome project-what did we learn? Trends in Genetics, 12:263–270, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Furukawa. On the completion of the most specific hypothesis computation in inverse entailment for mutual recursion. In Proceedings of Discovery Science’ 98, LNAI1532, pages 315–325, Berlin, 1998. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goffeau, A. et multi al. Life with 6000 genes. Science, 274:546–567, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Ito and A. Yamamoto. Finding hypotheses from examples by computing the least generlisation of bottom clauses. In S. Arikawa and H. Motoda, editors, Proceedings of Discovery Science’ 98, pages 303–314. Springer, Berlin, 1998. LNAI 1532.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.C. Kakas, R.A. Kowalski, and F. Toni. Abductive logic programming. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Muggleton. Inverse entailment and Progol. New Generation Computing, 13:245–286, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Muggleton. Completing inverse entailment. In C.D. Page, editor, Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP-98), LNAI 1446, pages 245–249. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S.G. Oliver. From DNA sequence to biological function. Nature, 379:597–600, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Plotkin. A further note on inductive generalization. In Machine Intelligence, volume 6. Edinburgh University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. De Raedt. Interactive Theory Revision: an Inductive Logic Programming Approach. Academic Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. De Raedt and M. Bruynooghe. Interactive concept-learning and constructive induction by analogy. Machine Learning, 8:107–150, 1992.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. L. De Raedt and N. Lavrac. Multiple predicate learning in two inductive logic programming settings. Journal on Pure and Applied Logic, 4(2):227–254, 1996.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. B. L. Richards and R. J. Mooney. Automated refinement of first-order Horn-clause domain theories. Machine Learning, 19(2):95–131, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.Y. Shapiro. Algorithmic program debugging. MIT Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Stickel. A Prolog technology theorem prover: implementation by an extended Prolog compiler. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 4(4):353–380, 1988.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Wogulis. Revising relational theories. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Machine Learning, pages 462–466. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Wrobel. First-order theory refinement. In L. De Raedt, editor, Advances in Inductive Logic Programming, pages 14–33. IOS Press, Ohmsha, Amsterdam, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Yamamoto. Which hypotheses can be found with inverse entailment? In N. Lavrač and S. Džeroski, editors, Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, pages 296–308. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997. LNAI 1297.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muggleton, S.H., Bryant, C.H. (2000). Theory Completion Using Inverse Entailment. In: Cussens, J., Frisch, A. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1866. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44960-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44960-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67795-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44960-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics