Skip to main content

Evaluation of Correctness Criteria for Dynamic Workflow Changes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management (BPM 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2678))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The capability to dynamically adapt in-progress workflows (WF) is an essential requirement for any workflow management system (WfMS). This fact has been recognized by the WF community for a long time and different approaches in the area of adaptive workflows have been developed so far. They either enable WF type changes and their propagation to in-progress WF instances or (ad-hoc) changes of single WF instances. Thus, at first glance, many of the major problems related to dynamic WF changes seem to be solved. However, this picture changes when digging deeper into the approaches and considering implementation and usability issues as well. This paper presents important criteria for the correct adaptation of running workflows and analyzes how actual approaches satisfy them. At this, we demonstrate the strengths of the different approaches and provide additional solutions to overcome current limitations. These solutions comprise comprehensive correctness criteria as well as migration rules for change realization.

This work was done within the research project “Change management in adaptive workflow systems”, which has been founded by the German Research Community (DFG).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agostini, A., De Michelis, G.: Improving flexibility of workflow management systems. In: Proc. BPM’ 2000. LNCS 1806, Springer (2000) 218–234

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W., Basten, T.: Inheritance of workflows: An approach to tackling problems related to change. Theoretical Computer Science 270 (2002) 125–203

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Edmond, D., ter Hofstede, A.: A reflective infrastructure for workflow adaptability. Data and Knowledge Engineering 34 (2000) 271–304

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Casati, F., Ceri, S., Pernici, B., Pozzi, G.: Workflow evolution. Data and Knowledge Engineering 24 (1998) 211–238

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellis, C., Keddara, K., Rozenberg, G.: Dynamic change within workflow systems. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. on Org. Comp. Sys. (COOCS’ 95), Milpitas, CA (1995) 10–21

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sadiq, S., Marjanovic, O., Orlowska, M.: Managing change and time in dynamic workflow processes. Int’l J Coop IS 9 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weske, M.: Formal foundation and conceptual design of dynamic adaptations in a workflow management system. In: Proc. 34th Hawaii Int’l Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS-34). (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: ADEPTflex-supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control. Journal of Intelligent Inf. Systems 10 (1998) 93–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiepuszewski, B., ter Hofstede, A., Bussler, C.: On structured workflow modelling. In: Proc. CAiSE’ 00. LNCS 1789, Springer (2000) 431–445

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ellis, C., Keddara, K.: A workflow change is a workflow. In: Proc. BPM 2000. Volume 1806 of LNCS., Springer (2000) 516–534

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joeris, G., Herzog, O.: Managing evolving workflow specifications. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. on Coop. Inf. Systems (CoopIS’ 98), New York City (1998) 310–321

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fent, A., Reiter, H., Freitag, B.: Design for change: Evolving workflow specifications in ULTRAflow. In: Proc. CAiSE’ 02. (2002) 516–534

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kradolfer, M., Geppert, A.: Dynamic workflow schema evolution based on workflow type versioning and workflow migration. In: Proc. CoopIS’ 99, Edinburgh (1999) 104–114

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ellis, C., Maltzahn, C.: The Chautauqua workflow system. In: Proc. 30th Int’l Conf. on System Science, Maui (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., Dadam, P. (2003). Evaluation of Correctness Criteria for Dynamic Workflow Changes. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2678. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44895-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44895-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40318-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44895-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics