Abstract
The capability to dynamically adapt in-progress workflows (WF) is an essential requirement for any workflow management system (WfMS). This fact has been recognized by the WF community for a long time and different approaches in the area of adaptive workflows have been developed so far. They either enable WF type changes and their propagation to in-progress WF instances or (ad-hoc) changes of single WF instances. Thus, at first glance, many of the major problems related to dynamic WF changes seem to be solved. However, this picture changes when digging deeper into the approaches and considering implementation and usability issues as well. This paper presents important criteria for the correct adaptation of running workflows and analyzes how actual approaches satisfy them. At this, we demonstrate the strengths of the different approaches and provide additional solutions to overcome current limitations. These solutions comprise comprehensive correctness criteria as well as migration rules for change realization.
This work was done within the research project “Change management in adaptive workflow systems”, which has been founded by the German Research Community (DFG).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agostini, A., De Michelis, G.: Improving flexibility of workflow management systems. In: Proc. BPM’ 2000. LNCS 1806, Springer (2000) 218–234
van der Aalst, W., Basten, T.: Inheritance of workflows: An approach to tackling problems related to change. Theoretical Computer Science 270 (2002) 125–203
Edmond, D., ter Hofstede, A.: A reflective infrastructure for workflow adaptability. Data and Knowledge Engineering 34 (2000) 271–304
Casati, F., Ceri, S., Pernici, B., Pozzi, G.: Workflow evolution. Data and Knowledge Engineering 24 (1998) 211–238
Ellis, C., Keddara, K., Rozenberg, G.: Dynamic change within workflow systems. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. on Org. Comp. Sys. (COOCS’ 95), Milpitas, CA (1995) 10–21
Sadiq, S., Marjanovic, O., Orlowska, M.: Managing change and time in dynamic workflow processes. Int’l J Coop IS 9 (2000)
Weske, M.: Formal foundation and conceptual design of dynamic adaptations in a workflow management system. In: Proc. 34th Hawaii Int’l Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS-34). (2001)
Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: ADEPTflex-supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control. Journal of Intelligent Inf. Systems 10 (1998) 93–129
Kiepuszewski, B., ter Hofstede, A., Bussler, C.: On structured workflow modelling. In: Proc. CAiSE’ 00. LNCS 1789, Springer (2000) 431–445
Ellis, C., Keddara, K.: A workflow change is a workflow. In: Proc. BPM 2000. Volume 1806 of LNCS., Springer (2000) 516–534
Joeris, G., Herzog, O.: Managing evolving workflow specifications. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. on Coop. Inf. Systems (CoopIS’ 98), New York City (1998) 310–321
Fent, A., Reiter, H., Freitag, B.: Design for change: Evolving workflow specifications in ULTRAflow. In: Proc. CAiSE’ 02. (2002) 516–534
Kradolfer, M., Geppert, A.: Dynamic workflow schema evolution based on workflow type versioning and workflow migration. In: Proc. CoopIS’ 99, Edinburgh (1999) 104–114
Ellis, C., Maltzahn, C.: The Chautauqua workflow system. In: Proc. 30th Int’l Conf. on System Science, Maui (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., Dadam, P. (2003). Evaluation of Correctness Criteria for Dynamic Workflow Changes. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2678. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44895-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44895-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40318-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44895-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive