Skip to main content

Uniform Derivation of Decision Procedures by Superposition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Science Logic (CSL 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2142))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We show how a well-known superposition-based inference system for first-order equational logic can be used almost directly as a decision procedure for various theories including lists, arrays, extensional arrays and combinations of them. We also give a superposition-based decision procedure for homomorphism.

The authors would like to thank C. Ringeissen and L. Vigneron for their comments on a draft of this paper and the anonymous referees for helpful criticisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Armando and S. Ranise. A Practical Extension Mechanism for Decision Procedures: the Case Study of Universal Presburger Arithmetic. J. of Universal Computer Science, 7(2):124–140, February 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Bachmair and H. Ganzinger. Rewrite-based equational theorem proving with selection and simplification. J. of Logic and Comp., 4(3):217–247, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Bachmair, I. V. Ramakrishnan, A. Tiwari, and L. Vigneron. Congruence closure modulo associativity and commutativity. In Frontiers of Comb. Sys.’s (FroCos’2000), LNCS 1794, pages 245–259, 2000.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. L. Bachmair and A. Tiwari. Abstract congruence closure and specializations. In D. A. McAllester, editor, 17th CADE, LNAI 1831, pages 64–78, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Caferra and Peltier. Decision procedures using model building techniques. In CSL: 9th Workshop on Computer Science Logic. LNCS 1092, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Dershowitz and J.-P. Jouannaud. Rewrite systems. In J. van Leeuwen, editor, Hand. of Theoretical Comp. Science, pages 243–320. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. B. Enderton. A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. Academic Pr., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. E. Knuth and P. E. Bendix. Simple word problems in universal algebra. In J. Leech, editor, Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra, pages 263–297, Oxford, 1970. Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Kounalis and M. Rusinowitch. On Word Problems in Horn Theories. JSC, 11(1&2):113–128, January/February 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Leitsch. Deciding horn classes by hyperresolution. In CSL: 3rd Workshop on Computer Science Logic. LNCS, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Marché. The word problem of ACD-ground theories is undecidable. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, 3(1):81–92, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Nelson. Techniques for Program Verification. Technical Report CSL-81-10, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, June 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Nelson and D.C. Oppen. Simplification by Cooperating Decision Procedures. Technical Report STAN-CS-78-652, Stanford CS Dept., April 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greg Nelson and Derek C. Oppen. Fast decision procedures based on congruence closure. Journal of the ACM, 27(2):356–364, 1980.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Narendran and M. Rusinowitch. Any ground associative-commutative theory has a finite canonical system. In 4th RTA Conf., Como (Italy), 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Nieuwenhuis and A. Rubio. Paramodulation-based theorem proving. In A. Robinson and A. Voronkov, editors, Hand. of Automated Reasoning. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Rusinowitch. Theorem-proving with Resolution and Superposition. JSC, 11(1&2):21–50, January/February 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Stump, D. L. Dill, C. W. Barrett, and J. Levitt. A Decision Procedure for an Extensional Theory of Arrays. In LICS’01, 2001. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. D. Ullman, A. V. Aho, and J. E. Hopcroft. The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1974.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Armando, A., Ranise, S., Rusinowitch, M. (2001). Uniform Derivation of Decision Procedures by Superposition. In: Fribourg, L. (eds) Computer Science Logic. CSL 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2142. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44802-0_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44802-0_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42554-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44802-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics