Skip to main content

Controlled Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms for Better Convergence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1993))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Preserving elitism is found to be an important issue in the study of evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO). Although there exists a number of new elitist algorithms, where elitism is introduced in different ways, the extent of elitism is likely to be an important matter. The desired extent of elitism is directly related to the so-called exploitation-exploration issue of an evolutionary algorithm (EA). For a particular recombination and mutation operators, there may exist a selection operator with a particular extent of elitism that will cause a smooth working of an EA. In this paper, we suggest an approach where the extent of elitism can be controlled by fixing a user-defined parameter. By applying an elitist multi-objective EA (NSGA-II) to a number of diffcult test problems, we show that the NSGA-II with controlled elitism has much better convergence property than the original NSGA-II. The need for a controlled elitism in evolutionary multi-objective optimiza- tion, demonstrated in this paper should encourage similar or other ways of implementing controlled elitism in other multi-objective evolutionary algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Corne, D. W., Knowles, J. D., and Oates, M. J. (2000). The Pareto envelopebased selection algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference, pp. 839–848.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agrawal, S. and Meyarivan, T. (2000). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Technical Report No. 2000001. Kanpur: Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., Mathur, A. P., Meyarivan, T. (2000). Constrained test problems for multiobjective evolutionary optimization. Technical Report No. 200002. Kanpur: Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, IIT Kanpur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T. (2000). A Fast Elitist Non dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference, pp. 849–858.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K. (1999) Multi-objective genetic algorithms: Problem difficulties and construction of test functions. Evolutionary Computation, 7(3), 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deb, K. and Agrawal, R. B. (1995) Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Systems, 9 115–148.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Knowles, J. and Corne, D. (1999) The Pareto archived evolution strategy: A new baseline algorithm for multiobjective optimisation. Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Piscataway: New Jersey: IEEE Service Center, 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Srinivas, N. and Deb, K. (1995). Multi-objective function optimization using nondominated sorting genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation(2), 221–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Steuer, R. E. (1986). Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, computation, and application. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zitzler, E. (1999). Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Methods and applications. Doctoral thesis ETH NO. 13398, Zürich: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zitzler, E., Deb, K., and Thiele, L. (2000). Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results. Evolutionary Computation Journal, 8(2), 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L. (1998). An evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: The strength Pareto approach. Technical Report No. 43 (May 1998).Zürich: Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Deb, K., Goel, T. (2001). Controlled Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms for Better Convergence. In: Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Deb, K., Coello Coello, C.A., Corne, D. (eds) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1993. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44719-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44719-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41745-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44719-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics