Skip to main content

Complete and Incomplete Knowledge in Logical Information Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2143))

Abstract

We present a generalization of logic All I Know by presenting it as an extension of standard modal logics. We study how this logic can be used to represent complete and incomplete knowledge in Logical Information Systems. In these information systems, a knowledge base is a collection of objects (e.g., files, bibliographical items) described in the same logic as used for expressing queries. We show that usual All I Know (transitive and euclidean accessibility relation) is convenient for representing complete knowledge, but not for incomplete knowledge. For this, we use serial All I Know (serial accessibility relation).

This author is supported by a scholarship from CNRS and Région Bretagne

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Bowen. Model Theory for Modal Logic. D. Reidel, London, 1979.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen. The logic of only knowing as a unified framework for non-monotonic reasoning. FUNDINF: Fundamenta Informatica, 21, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. T. Devanbu and M. A. Jones. The use of description logics in KBSE systems. In Bruno Fadini, editor, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 23–38, Sorrento, Italy, May 1994. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. M. Donini, D. Nardi, and R. Rosati. Autoepistemic description logics. In IJCAI, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sébastien Ferré and Olivier Ridoux. A file system based on concept analysis. In Yehoshua Sagiv, editor, International Conference on Rules and Objects in Databases, LNCS 1861, pages 1033–1047. Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Godin, R. Missaoui, and A. April. Experimental comparison of navigation in a Galois lattice with conventional information retrieval methods. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(5):747–767, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hector Levesque. All I know: a study in autoepistemic logic. Artificial Intelligence, 42(2), March 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Lifschitz. Nonmonotonic databases and epistemic queries. In 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 381–386, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fabio Massacci. Strongly analytic tableaux for normal modal logics. In Alan Bundy, editor, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automated Deduction, LNAI 814, pages 723–737, Berlin, 1994. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  10. John McCarthy. Applications of circumscription to formalizing common sense knowledge. Artificial Intelligence, 28(1), 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robert C. Moore. Semantical considerations on nonmonotonic logic. Artificial Intelligence, 25(1):75–94, 1985.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Raymond Reiter. What should a database know? Journal of Logic Programming, 14(1–2):127–153, October 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Riccardo Rosati. Tableau calculus for only knowing and knowing at most. In Roy Dickhoff, editor, TABLEAUX, LNCS 1847. Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rudolf Wille. Ordered Sets, chapter Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts, pages 445–470. Reidel, Dordrecht Boston, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ferré, S. (2001). Complete and Incomplete Knowledge in Logical Information Systems. In: Benferhat, S., Besnard, P. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2143. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44652-4_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44652-4_69

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42464-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44652-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics