Skip to main content

Enhancing Multi-Agent Based Simulation with Human-Like Decision Making Strategies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multi-Agent-Based Simulation (MABS 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1979))

Abstract

We are exploring the enhancement of models of agent behaviour with more “human-like” decision making strategies than are presently available. Our motivation is to build multi-agent based simulations of human societies that would exhibit more realistic simulation behaviours. This in turn will allow researchers to study more complex issues regarding individual and organisational performance than is possible with present systems. Drawing on studies into naturalistic decision making, which looks at people’s decision making in their natural environments, we propose ways of integrating a recognition-primed decision making approach with the popular BDI agent architecture, and report on preliminary empirical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agent Oriented Software Pty. Ltd. JACK Intelligent Agents. URL: http://www.agent-software.com.au/jack.html. 220

  2. John R. Anderson and Christian Lebiere. The Atomic Components of Thought. Lawrence Eribaum Associates, 1998. 215

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michael E. Bratman. Intention, Plans and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusets, 1987. 219

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael E. Bratman, David J. Israel, and Martha E. Pollack. Plans and resourcebounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 4(4):349–355, 1988. 219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. CHI Systems Inc. COGNET-COGnition as a NEtwork of Tasks. URL: http://www.chiinc.com/cognethome.shtml. 215

  6. M. d’lnverno, D. Kinny, M. Luck, and M. Wooldridge. A formal specification of dMARS. In M. P. Singh, A. Rao, and M. J. Wooldridge, editors, Intelligent Agents IV (LNAI Volume 1365), volume 1365 of Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 155–176. Springer, 1997. 215, 220

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hubert L. Dreyfus. Intuitive, deliberative and calculative models of expert performance. In Caroline E. Zsambok and Gary Klein, editors, Naturalistic Decision Making, pages 17–28. Lawrence Eribaum Associates, 1997. 217

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bruce Edmonds. The pragmatic roots of context. In Modeling and Using Context: the Proceedings of CONTEXT’99, volume 1688of Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 119–132, Trento, Italy, 1999. Springer-Verlag. 223

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rhona Flin, Keith Stewart, and Georgina Slaven. Emergency decision making in the offshore oil and gas industry. Human Factors, 38(2):262–277,1996221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Glint Heinze, Bradley Smith, and Martin Cross. Thinking quickly: Agents for modeling air warfare. In Proceedings of the Eighth Australian Joint Conference on Artificical Intelligence, Brisbane, Australia, 1998. 216

    Google Scholar 

  11. Randolph M. Jones, John E. Laird, Paul E. Nielsen, Karen J. Coulter, Patrick Kenny, and Frank V. Koss. Automated intelligent pilots for combat flight simulation. AI Magazine, Spring:27–41, 1999. 214

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gary Klein. Sources of Power. The MIT Press, 1998. 217, 218

    Google Scholar 

  13. Janet Kolodner. Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1993. 221

    Google Scholar 

  14. John E. Laird. It knows what you’re going to do: Adding anticipation to a quakebot. Technical Report SS-00–02, AAAI, March 2000. 216

    Google Scholar 

  15. John E. Laird, Alien Newell, and Paul S. Rosenbloom. Soar: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33(1): 1–64, 1987. 215

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Raanan Lipshitz. Converging themes in the study of decision making in realistic settings. In Gary A. Klein, Judith Orasanu, Roberta Calderwood, and Caroline E. Zsambok, editors, Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, pages 103–137. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1993. 217

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. A. Mellers, A. Schwartz, and A. D. J. Cooke. Judgement and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 49:447–478, 1998. 214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Judith Orasanu and Terry Connolly. The reinvention of decision making. In Gary A. Klein, Judith Orasanu, Roberta Calderwood, and Caroline E. Zsambok, editors, Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, pages 3–20. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1993. 217

    Google Scholar 

  19. Anand S. Rao and Michael P. George.. Modelling rational agents within a BDI architecture. In J. Alien, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall, editors, Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KRR-91). Kaufmann, 1991. 215

    Google Scholar 

  20. Richard S. Sutton and Andrew G. Barto. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, 1998. 222

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gil Tidhar, Clinton Heinze, and Mario Selvestrel. Flying together: Modelling air mission teams. Applied Intelligence, 8(3): 195–218,1998214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Caroline E. Zsambok. Naturalistic decision making:Where are we now? In Caroline E. Zsambok and Gary Klein, editors, Naturalistic Decision Making, pages 3–16. Lawrence Eribaum Associates, 1997. 216

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Norling, E., Sonenberg, L., Rönnquist, R. (2000). Enhancing Multi-Agent Based Simulation with Human-Like Decision Making Strategies. In: Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation. MABS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1979. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44561-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44561-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41522-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44561-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics