Skip to main content

Engineering Social Order

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Societies in the Agents World (ESAW 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1972))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Social Order becomes a major problem in MAS and in computer mediated human interaction. After explaining the notions of Social Order and Social Control, I claim that there are multiple and complementary approaches to Social Order and to its engineering: all of them must be exploited. In computer science one try to solve this problem by rigid formalisation and rules, constraining infrastructures, security devices, etc. I think that a more socially oriented approach is also needed. My point is that Social Control - and in particular decentralised and autonomous Social Control - will be one of the most effective approaches.

This work has been and is being developed within the ALFEBIITE European Project: A Logical Framework For Ethical Behaviour Between Infohabitants In The Information Trading Economy Of The Universal Information Ecosystem. - IST- 1999-10298.

The spreading identification between “social order” and cooperation is troublesome. I use here social order as “desirable”, good social order (from the point of view of an observer or designer, or from the point of view of the participants). However, more generally social order should be conceived as any form of systemic phenomenon or structure which is sufficiently stable, or better either self-organising and self-reproducing through the actions of the agents, or consciously orchestrated by (some of) them. Social order is neither necessarily

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Binmore, K., Castelfranchi, C., Doran, J. and Wooldridge, M. Rationality in Multi-Agent Systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 13:3, 1998, 309–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Castelfranchi, C., and R. Conte. Emergent functionalitiy among intelligent systems: Cooperation within and without minds. AI & Society, 6, 78–93, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Castelfranchi, C., Commitment: from intentions to groups and organizations. In Proceedings of ICMAS’96, S. Francisco, June 1996, AAAI-MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castelfranchi, C. Reasons: Belief Support and Goal Dynamics. Mathware & Soft Computing, 3. pp. 233–47.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castelfranchi, C. Emergence and Cognition: Towards a Synthetic Paradigm in AI and Cognitive Science. In H. Coelho (Ed.) Progress in Artificial Intelligence-IBERAMIA 98, Springer, LNAI 1484, Berlin, 1998 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Castelfranchi, C. Through the minds of the agents, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1(1), 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Castelfranchi, C., Modelling Social Action for AI Agents. Artificial Intelligence, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Castelfranchi, C., Dignum, F., Jonker, C., Treur, J. (1999) Deliberate Normative Agents: Principles and Architecture. ATAL.99, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Castelfranchi, C. Formalising the Informal? (invited talk). DEON.00, Touluse.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Castelfranchi, C. The theory of social functions. Challenges for multi-agent-based social simulation and multi-agent learning. ( invited talk at SimSoc.97, Cortona, Italy) to appear in Cognitive Systems, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Castelfranchi, C. and Tan, Y. H. (eds.) (in press) “Trust, Deception and Fraud in Artificial Societies” Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Conte, R. and Castelfranchi, C. Cognitive and Social Action, UCL Press, London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Conte, R., Hegselmann, R. and Terna, P. (eds) Studies in social simulation. Berlin, Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Conte, R. e Castelfranchi, C. (1998) From conventions to prescriptions. Towards a unified theory of norms. AI&Law, 1998, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C., Dignum, F. Autonomous Norm Acceptance. In J. Mueller (ed) Proceedings of the 5th International workshop on Agent Theories Architectures and Languages, Paris, 4-7 July, 1998 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Denti, E., Omicini, A., Toschi, V. Coordination technology for the development of MAS on the Web. In E. Lamma and P. Mello (eds.) AI*IA.99 Congress, Bologna, Pitagora Editrice. page. 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elster, J., Marxism, functionalism and game-theory: the case for methodological individualism. Theory and Society 11, 453–81.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Forrest, S., (ed.).Emergent computation. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Gasser, L.,. Social conceptions of knowledge and action: DAI foundations and open systems semantics. Artificial Intelligence 47: 107–138.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gasser, L.,. Invited talk at Autonomous Agents.98, Minneapoli May 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gilbert, N., and Conte, R. (eds) Artificial Societies: the computer simulation of social life. London, UCL Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grosz, B., Collaborative Systems. AI Magazine, summer 1996, 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hartmann, A. (1995) “Comprehensive information technology security: A new approach to respond ethical and social issues surrounding information security in the 21st century.” In IFIP TCI 11 Intern. Conf. of Information Security.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hayek, F. A., The result of human action but not of human design. In Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Routledge & Kegan, London, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hogg L. M. and Jennings N. R. (1997): Socially Rational Agents, in Proc. AAAI Fallsymposium on Socially Intelligent Agents, Boston, Mass., November 8-10, 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Homans, G. C., The Human Group, N.Y. 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson, H. M. Sociology: a systematic introduction. N.Y. 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jennings, N. R.,. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 3, 1993: 223–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jones, A. J. I. & Sergot, M. 1996. A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power. Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics, 4(3): 427–45.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kaminka, G. A. and Tambe, M. (2000) “Robust Agent Teams via Socially-Attentive Monitoring”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Volume 12, pages 105–147.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Kirn, S. Invited Talk. AOIS.99, Hidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Leiwo, J. and Heikkuri, S. (1996) An Analysis of Ethics Foundations of Information Security in Distributed Systems, TR. Nokia TeleC, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Macy, M. Social Order in Artificial Worlds, In JASSSI, 1-Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol.1, no.1, 1998. http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1.html.

  34. Mataric, M.,. Designing Emergent Behaviors: From Local Interactions to Collective Intelligence. In Simulation of Adaptive Behavior 2. MIT Press. Cambridge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Parsons, T. The Social System, Glencoe, Ill. 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Parunak, H. V. N., S. Brueckner, J. Sauter, R. Matthews. Distinghuishing Environmental and Agent Dynamics: A Case study in Abstraction and Alternative Modeling Technologies. In this volume, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Steels, L., Cooperation between distributed agents through self-organization. In Y. Demazeau & J. P. Mueller (eds.) Decentralized AI North-Holland, Elsevier, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Todd. P. M. Book Review of S. Forrest ‘Emergent Computation’. Artificial Intelligence, 60, 1993, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Verhagen, H. Normative Autonomous Agents. PhD. Thesis, University of Stockolm, May, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wagner, G. (1997) “Multi-Level Security in Multiagent Systems”, in P. Kandzia and M. Klusch (Eds), Cooperative Information Agents, Springer LNAI 1202, 1997, 272–285.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wooldridge M. J. and Jennings N. R. (Eds.) 1995 Intelligent Agents: Theories, Architectures, and Languages. LNAI 890, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Castelfranchi, C. (2000). Engineering Social Order. In: Omicini, A., Tolksdorf, R., Zambonelli, F. (eds) Engineering Societies in the Agents World. ESAW 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1972. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44539-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44539-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41477-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44539-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics