Skip to main content

Θ supin2 -Completeness: A Classical Approach for New Results

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
FST TCS 2000: Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1974))

Abstract

In this paper we present an approach for proving Θp supin2 -completeness. There are several papers in which different problems of logic, of combinatorics, and of approximation are stated to be complete for parallel access to NP, i.e.Θp supin2 -complete.

There is a special acceptance concept for nondeterministic Turing machines which allows a characterization of Θp supin2 as a polynomial-time bounded class.

This characterization is the starting point of this paper. It makes a master reduction from that type of Turing machines to suitable boolean formula problems possible. From the reductions we deduce a couple of conditions that are sufficient for proving Θp supin2 -hardness. These new conditions are applicable in a canonical way. Thus we are able to do the following: (i) we can prove the Θp supin2 for different combinatorial problems (e.g. max-card-clique compare) as well as for optimization problems (e.g. the Kemeny voting scheme), (ii) we can simplify known proofs for Θp supin2 (e.g. for the Dodgson voting scheme), and (iii) we can transfer this technique for proving Δp supin2 -completeness (e.g. TSPcompare).

Supported in part by grant NSF-INT-9815095/DAAD-315-PPP-gü-ab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Bartholdi III, C.A. Tovey, M.A. Trick. Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election. Social Choice and Welfare 6 (1989), 157–165

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Condorcet. Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. Paris, 1785

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.A. Cook. The complexity of theorem-proving procedures. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Symp. on the Foundations of Computer Science 1971, 524–535

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.C. Fishburn. Condorcet social choice functions. SIAM J Appl Math, 33 (1977), 469–489

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. M.R. Garey, D.S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman & Company,1979

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Hemaspaandra, L. Hemaspaandra, J. Rothe. Exact Analysis of Dodgson Elections: Lewis Carroll’s 1876 Voting System is Complete for Parallel Access to NP. JACM, 44(6) (1997), 806–825

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Hemaspaandra. The complexity of Kemeny elections. In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Hemaspaandra, L. Hemaspaandra. Computational Politics: Electoral Systems. Proceedings of MFCS 2000, LNCS 1893, 64–83

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.M. Karp. Reducibility among combinatorial problems, in R.E. Miller and J.W. Thatcher (eds.), Complexity of Computer Computations, Plenum Press, New York, 85–103

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Krentel. The complexity of optimization problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 36 (1988), 490–509

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Machtey, P. Young. An Introduction to General Theory of Algorithms. North-Holland, New York, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. H. Papadimitriou. Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Spakowski, J. Vogel. The Operators minCh and maxCh on the Polynomial Hierarchy. Proceedings of FCT 99, LNCS 1684, 524–535

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Spakowski, J. Vogel. The complexity of voting schemes-a method for proving completeness for parallel access to NP. Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany, TR Math/Inf/00/16.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K.W. Wagner. More complicated questions about maxima an minima, and some closures of NP. Theoretical Computer Science, 51(1987), 53–80

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. K.W. Wagner. Bounded query classes. SIAM Journal on Computing, 19(1990), 833–846

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Spakowski, H., Vogel, J. (2000). Θ supin2 -Completeness: A Classical Approach for New Results. In: Kapoor, S., Prasad, S. (eds) FST TCS 2000: Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science. FSTTCS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1974. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44450-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44450-5_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41413-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44450-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics