Skip to main content

Induction of Recursive Transfer Rules

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning Language in Logic (LLL 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1925))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Transfer rules are used in bi-lingual translation systems for transferring a logical representation of a source language sentence into a logical representation of the corresponding target language sentence. This work studies induction of transfer rules from examples of corresponding pairs of source-target quasi logical formulae (QLFs). The main features of this problem are: i) more than one rule may need to be produced from a single example, ii) only positive examples are provided and iii) the produced hypothesis should be recursive. In an earlier study of this problem, a system was proposed in which hand-coded heuristics were employed for identifying non-recursive correspondences. In this work we study the case when non-recursive transfer rules have been given to the system instead of heuristics. Results from a preliminary experiment with English-French QLFs are presented, demonstrating that this information is sufficient for the generation of generally applicable rules that can be used for transfer between previously unseen source and target QLFs. However, the experiment also shows that the system suffers from producing overly specific rules, even when the problem of disallowing the derivation of other target QLFs than the correct one is not considered. Potential approaches to this problem are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alshawi H. (ed.) (1992). The core language engine, Cambridge,MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agnäs, M-S., Alshawi, H., Bretan, I., Carter, D., Ceder, K., Collins, M., Crouch, R., Digalakis, V., Ekholm, B., Gambäck, B., Kaja, J., Karlgren, J., Lyberg, B., Price, P., Pulman, S., Rayner, M., Samuelsson, C. & Svensson, T., (1994). Spokenlanguage translator: first-year report, SICS research report, ISRN SICS-R-94/03-SE, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boström, H., (1998). Predicate Invention and Learning from Positive Examples Only. In Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Machine Learning, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag (pp. 226–237)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boström, H., & Zemke, S., (1996). Learning transfer rules by inductive logic programming (preliminary report), Dept. of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University and Royal Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clocksin, W.F., & Mellish, C.S., (1981). Programming in prolog, Springer Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cussens, J., (1999). Loglinear Models for First-Order Probabilistic Reasoning. In Proceedings of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann (pp. 126–133)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lloyd, J. W., (1987). Foundations of logic programming, (2nd edition), Berlin Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  8. Milward, D., & Pulman, S., (1997). Transfer learning using QLFs, Technical report, SRI International, Cambridge, G.B.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mooney, R. J., & Cali., M. E., (1996). Learning the past tense of English verbs using inductive logic programming. In S. Wermter, E. Rilo. & G. Scheler (eds.), Symbolic, Connectionist and Statistical Approaches to Learning for Natural Language Processing, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag (pp. 370–384)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Muggleton, S., (1995). Inverse Entailment and Progol. In New Generation Computing 13 245–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muggleton, S., (1995). Stochastic logic programs. In De Raedt L. (ed.), Advances Inductive Logic Programming, Amsterdam: IOS Press (pp. 254–264)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quinlan, J. R., (1990). Learning Logical Definitions from Relations. In Machine Learning 5 239–266

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boström, H. (2000). Induction of Recursive Transfer Rules. In: Cussens, J., Džeroski, S. (eds) Learning Language in Logic. LLL 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1925. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40030-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40030-3_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41145-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40030-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics