Skip to main content

Delay Bounds in a Network with Aggregate Scheduling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quality of Future Internet Services (QofIS 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1922))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A large number of products implementing aggregate buffering and scheduling mechanisms have been developed and deployed, and still more are under development. With the rapid increase in the demand for reliable end-to-end QoS solutions, it becomes increasingly important to understand the implications of aggregate scheduling on the resulting QoS capabilities. This paper studies the bounds on the worst case delay in a network implementing aggregate scheduling. We derive an upper bound on the queuing delay as a function of priority traffic utilization and the maximum hop count of any flow, and the shaping parameters at the network ingress. Our bound explodes at a certain utilization level which is a function of the hop count. We show that for a general network configuration and larger utilization utilization an upper bound on delay, if it exists, must be a function of the number of nodes and/or the number of flows in the network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V. Jacobson, K. Nichols, K. Poduri. An Expedited Forwarding PHB, RFC 2598, June 1999. 1,2

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Baker, C. Iturralde, F. Le Faucheur, B. Davie. Aggregation of RSVP for IPv4 and IPv6 Reservations, draft-ietf-issll-rsvp-aggr-00.txt September 1999, work in progress. 2, 5

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Brichet, L. Massoulie, J. Roberts Stochastic Ordering and the Notion of Negligible CDV, ITC15, Washington, D. C. June 1997. 3

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schenker, S., Partridge, C., Guerin, R. Specification of Guaranteed Quality of Service, RFC 2212 September 1997 3

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. L. Cruz. Quality of service guarantees in virtual circuit switched networks. IEEE JSAC, pages 1048–1056, August 1995. 5, 6

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.-Y. Le Boudec. Application of network calculus to guaranteed service networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 441087–1096, May1998. 5, 6

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. S. Chang. On deterministic traffic regulation and service guarantee A systematic approach by filtering. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 441096–1107, August 1998. 5, 6

    Google Scholar 

  8. R._Agrawal, R. L._Cruz, C. Okino, and R. Rajan. Performance bounds for flow control protocols. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (7)3, pages 310–323, June 1999. 5, 6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parekh A. K. and Gallager R. G., A generalized processor sharing approach toflow control in integrated services networks The multiple node case. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol 2-2, pages 137–150, April 1994. 6

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Andrews, B. Awerbuch, A. Fernandez, J. Kleinberg, T. Leighton, and Z. Liu. Universal stability results for greedy contention resolution protocols. In 37th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’96), Burlington VT, October 1996. 4, 6

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.Y. Le Boudec and G. Hebuterne. Comment on a deterministic approach to the end-to-end analysis of packet flows in connection oriented network. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, February 2000. 4, 7

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. Chlamtac, A. Faragò, H. Zhang, and A. Fumagalli. A deterministic approach to the end-to-end analysis of packet flows in connection oriented networks. IEEE/ACM transactions on networking, (6)4422–431, 08 1998. 4, 7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. S. Chang. A filtering theory for Communication Networks. Springer Verlag, 1999. 6

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Charny. “Delay Bounds in a Network with Aggregate Scheduling”. Draft version. ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/ftp/acharny/aggregate delay v4.ps, February 2000. 7

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Charny, A., Boudec, JY.L. (2000). Delay Bounds in a Network with Aggregate Scheduling. In: Crowcroft, J., Roberts, J., Smirnov, M.I. (eds) Quality of Future Internet Services. QofIS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1922. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39939-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39939-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41076-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39939-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics