Skip to main content

Designing Algorithms for Dependent Process Failures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Future Directions in Distributed Computing

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2584))

Abstract

Most fault-tolerant algorithms are designed assuming that out of n components, no more than t can be faulty. For example, solutions to the Consensus problem are usually developed assuming no more than t of the n processes are faulty, where “being faulty” is specialized by a failure model. We call this the t of n assumption (also known as threshold model). It is a convenient assumption to make. For example, bounds are easily expressed as a function of t: if processes can fail only by crashing, then the Consensus problem is solvable when t < n if the system is synchronous and when t < 2n if the system is asynchronous extended with a failure detector of the class ◊W. [5.5], [5.1]

This work was developed in the context of the RAMP project, supported by DARPA as project number N66001-01-1-8933.

The author is partially supported by a scholarship from CAPES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Chandra, V. Hadzilacos, and S. Toueg. TheWeakest Failure Detector for Solving Consensus. Journal of the ACM, 43(4):685–722, July 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Doudou and A. Schiper. Muteness Detectors for Consensus with Byzantine Processes. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Principle of Distributed Computing, page 315, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, July 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Hirt and U. Maurer. Complete Characterization of Adversaries Tolerable in Secure Multy-Party Computation. In ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 25–34, Santa Barbara, California, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Junqueira and K. Marzullo. Consensus for Dependent Process Failures. Technical report, UCSD, La Jolla, CA, September 2002. http://www.cs.ucsd.edu/users/.avio/Docs/Gen.ps.

  5. I. Keidar and S. Rajsbaum. On the Cost of Fault-Tolerant Consensus When There Are No Faults-A Tutorial. Technical Report MIT-LCS-TR-821, MIT, May 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Malkhi and M. Reiter. Byzantine Quorum Systems. In 29th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 569–578, May 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Ren and J. B. Dugan. Optimal Design of Reliable Systems Using Static and Dynamic Fault Trees. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 47(3):234–244, December 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Thambidurai and Y.-K. Park. Interactive Consistency with Multiple Failure Modes. In IEEE 7th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, pages 93–100, Columbus, Ohio, October 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Junqueira, F., Marzullo, K. (2003). Designing Algorithms for Dependent Process Failures. In: Schiper, A., Shvartsman, A.A., Weatherspoon, H., Zhao, B.Y. (eds) Future Directions in Distributed Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2584. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37795-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37795-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00912-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37795-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics