Skip to main content

Object Teams: Improving Modularity for Crosscutting Collaborations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Objects, Components, Architectures, Services, and Applications for a Networked World (NODe 2002)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate whether module concepts for capturing multi-object collaborations can be effectively used to implement crosscutting concerns in reusable, independently developed modules for a-posteriori integration into existing systems. A new kind of collaboration module, called Object Teams, is proposed which combines the best features of existing approaches, further enhances them with concepts for expressing crosscutting relations between independent collaborations, and facilitates a-posteriori integration of such collaborations into existing systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Brichau, W. De Meuter, and K. De Volder. Jumping aspects. position paper at the workshop “Aspects and Dimensions of Concerns”, ECOOP 2000, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. D’souza and A. Wills. Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML-The Catalysis Approach. Addison-Wesly, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Ernst. Family polymorphism. In Proc. of ECOOP’01, number 2072 in LNCS, pages 303–326. Springer Verlag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Harrison and H. Ossher. Subject-oriented programming: a critique of pure objects. In Proc. of OOPSLA’93, pages 411–428. ACM, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Haupt. JADE: Entwurf und Implementierung eines Sprachkonstruktes zur dynamischen Komposition wiederverwendbarer Softwaremodule als Erweiterung der Programmiersprache Java. Diploma thesis, Universität-Gesamthochschule Siegen, http://www.st.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/projects/JADE/, December 2000.

  6. S. Herrmann. Composable designs with UFA. In Workshop on Aspect-Oriented Modeling with UML at [1], 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Herrmann and M. Mezini. PIROL:Acase study for multidimensional separation of concerns in software engineering environments. In Proc. of OOPSLA 2000. ACM, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Herrmann and M. Mezini. Combining composition styles in the evolvable language LAC. In Proc. of ASoC workshop at the 23nd ICSE, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Kiczales, E. Hisdale, J. Hugunin, M. Kersten, and J. Palm. An overview of AspectJ. In Proc. of 15th ECOOP, number 2072 in LNCS, pages 327–353. Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Kiczales, J. Lamping, A. Mendhekar, C. Maeda, C. Lopes, J. Loingtier, and J. Irwin. Aspect Oriented Programming. In Proceedings of ECOOP’ 97, number 1241 in LNCS, pages 220–243, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Kniesel, P. Costanza, and M. Austermann. JMangler-a framework for load-time transformation of Java class files. In First IEEE Int’l Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM 2001), Nov. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Lieberherr, D. Lorenz, and M. Mezini. Programming with aspectual components. In Technical Report, Northeastern University, Apr. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Mezini and K. Lieberherr. Adaptive Plug-and-Play Components for evolutionary software development. In Proc. OOPSLA’98, volume 33 of SIGPLAN Notices, pages 97–116. ACM, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Mezini, L. Seiter, and K. Lieberherr. Software Architecture and Component Technology: State of the Art in Research and Practice, chapter Component Integration with Pluggable Composite Adapters. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Ostermann. Dynamically composable collaborations with delegation layers. In Proc. of ECOOP 2002, LNCS. Springer Verlag, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Reenskaug. Working with Objects-The OORAM Software Engineering Method. Prentice Hall, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Smaragdakis and D. Batory. Implementing layered designs with mixin layers. In Proc. of ECOOP’98, number 1445 in LNCS, pages 550–570. Springer Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Tarr and H. Ossher. Hyper/J User and Installation Manual. IBM Corporation, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. VanHilst and D. Notkin. Using role components to implement collaboration-based design. In Proc. of OOPSLA’96, volume 28(10) of ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Herrmann, S. (2003). Object Teams: Improving Modularity for Crosscutting Collaborations. In: Aksit, M., Mezini, M., Unland, R. (eds) Objects, Components, Architectures, Services, and Applications for a Networked World. NODe 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2591. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36557-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36557-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00737-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36557-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics