Abstract
UML class diagrams can be used as a language for expressing a conceptual model of a domain. We use the General Ontological Language (GOL) and its underlying upper level ontology, proposed in [1], to evaluate the ontological correctness of a conceptual UML class model and to develop guidelines for how the constructs of the UML should be used in conceptual modeling. In particular, we discuss the UML metaconcepts of classes and objects, powertypes, association and aggregation/composition from an ontological point of view. We make some proposals of how to extend version 1.4 of the UML in order to obtain a more satisfactory treatment of aggregation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Degen, W., Heller B., Herre H., Smith, B.: GOL: Towards an axiomatized upper level ontology. In Barry Smith and Nicola Guarino, editors, Proceedings of FOIS’01, Ogunquit, Maine, USA, October 2001. ACM Press.
Cranefield, S., Purvis M.: UML as an ontology modelling language, Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Information Integration, 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-99), Germany, University of Karlsruhe (1999) 46–53.
Baclawski K. et al.: Extending UML to Support Ontology Engineering for the Semantic Web, Fourth International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language: UML 2001, Toronto, Canada, 2001.
Overgaard G.: A formal approach to relationships in the Unified Modeling Language. In Manfred Broy, Derek Coleman, Tom S. E. Maibaum, and Bernhard Rumpe, editors, Proceedings PSMT’98 Workshop on Precise Semantics for Modeling Techniques. Technische Universitat Munchen, TUM-I9803, 1998.
Evans A., France R., Lano K., Rumpe B.: Developing the UML as a formal modelling notation. In Pierre-Alain Muller and Jean Bezivin, editors, Proceedings of UML’98 International Workshop, Mulhouse, France, June 3-4, 1998, pages 297–307. ESSAIM, Mulhouse, France, 1998.
Guizzardi, G., Herre, H., Wagner G.: On the General Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modeling. In Proceedings of 21th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2002). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
Henderson-Sellers, B., Barbier F.: What Is This Thing Called Aggregation, proceedings of Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems Europe’99, Nancy, France, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 236–250, June 7-10, 1999 (ISBN: 0-7695-0275-X)
Bunge M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Vol. 3. Ontology I. The Furniture of the World. D. Reidel Publishing, New York, 1977.
Varzi. A.C.: Parts, wholes, and part-whole relations: The prospects of mereotopology. J. of Data and Knowledge Engineering, 20:259–286, 1996.
Artale A., Franconi E., Guarino N., Pazzi L.: 1996. Part-Whole Relations in Object-Centered Systems: an Overview. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 20(3): 347–383.
Winston M.E.; Chaffin R.; Herrman D.: A taxonomy of part-whole relations, Cognitive Science 11 (1987), pp.417-444.
Iris M.; Litowitz B.; Evens M.: Problems of the part-whole relation. In M. Evens (Ed.) Relational Models of the Lexicon, Cambridge University Press (1988), pp.261–288.
Bunge M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol. 4: Ontology II: A World of Systems, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland, 1979.
Genesereth, M. R., Fikes, R.E.: Knowledge Interchange Format, Version 3.0, Reference Manual, Logic Group Report Logic-92-1, Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Sowa J.F.: Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations, Brooks Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove, CA, 1999.
Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Articial Intelligence, Prentice Hall, 1995.
Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Otramari, A.: Understanding Top-Level Ontological Distinctions. Technical Report 04/2001,LADSEB-CNR.
Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology and Information Systems, in: N. Guarino (ed.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems Proceedings of FOIS’ 98, Trento, Italy, Amsterdam, IOSPress.
Evermann J., Wand Y.: Towards ontologically based semantics for UML constructs. In H.S. Kunii, S. Jajodia, and A. Solvberg, editors, Proceedings of ER 2001, pages 354–367. Springer-Verlag, 2001.
Wand Y., Storey V.C., Weber R.: An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 24(4):494–528, December 1999.
Opdahl A., Henderson-Sellers, B., Barbier F.: Ontological Analysis of whole-part relationships in OO-models, Information and Software Technology 43 (2001), pp. 387–399.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Guizzardi, G., Herre, H., Wagner, G. (2002). Towards Ontological Foundations for UML Conceptual Models. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2002: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE. OTM 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2519. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36124-3_70
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36124-3_70
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00106-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36124-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive