Skip to main content

Knowledge Interactions between Universities and Industry in Austria: Sectoral Patterns and Determinants

  • Chapter
Innovation, Networks, and Knowledge Spillovers

Abstract

The relationship between university and industry is a complex and heterogeneous phenomenon, and an important topic of the recent debate on innovation systems. This chapter explores the role of knowledge flows between universities and firms in the Austrian national innovation system and provides valuable insights into several dimensions of knowledge flows that are not typically explored in research on this topic. The patterns of interaction between 46 different fields of science and 49 economic sectors represent an important and interesting outcome of the analysis. Left censored Tobit models are used to evaluate the effect of sector specific and science field specific characteristics upon the probability of knowledge interaction, disaggregated by type of interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ács Z., Fitzroy F. and Smith I., (1994): High technology employment and university R&D spillovers: Evidence from US cities. Paper presented at the 41st Annual North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International, Niagara Falls

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida P. and Kogut B. (1995): The geographic localization of ideas and the mobility of patent holders, Paper presented at the Conference on “Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Global Economy”, organised by CIBER, University of Maryland, October 20, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L., Varga A. and Ács Z. (1997): Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations, Journal of Urban Economics 42(3), 422–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bania N., Eberts R. and Fogarty M. (1993): Universities and the startup of new companies: Can we generalise from Route 128 and Silicon Valley? The Review of Economics and Statistics 75(4), 761–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bania N., Calkins L. and Dalenberg R. (1992): The effects of regional science and technology policy on the geographic distribution of industrial R&D laboratories, Journal of Regional Science 32(2), 209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batten D.F., Kobayashi K. and Andersson Å.E. (1989): Knowledge, nodes and networks: An analytical perspective. In: Andersson Å.E., Batten D.F. and Karlsson C. (eds.) Knowledge and Industrial Organization, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 31–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi A. and Piccaluga A. (1994): A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships, R&D Management 24(2), 229–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma R. (1999): Culture of trust and regional development: An empirical analysis of the Third Italy, Paper presented at the 39th European Congress of the Regional Science Association 1999, 23–27 August 1999, Dublin, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman B. (2000): Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory, Research Policy 29(4/5), 627–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B. and Fridh A.C. (2000): Technology transfer in United States universities: A survey and statistical analysis, Department of Economics, Weatherhead School of Management, Cleveland

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W.M. (1996): Empirical studies of innovative activity. In: Stoneman, P. (ed.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell, Oxford [UK], Cambridge [MA], pp. 182–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W.M. and Levinthal D.A. (1990): Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W.M. and Levinthal D.A. (1989): Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D, Economic Journal 99(397), 569–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David P.A. and Foray D. (1995): Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base, STI-Review 16, 13–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson M. (1994): Technological collaboration and innovation. In: Dodgson M. and Rothwell R. (eds.) The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Chelterham [UK], Brookfield [VT], pp. 285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M.M. (2001): Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation, The Annals of Regional Science 35(2), 199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M.M., Fröhlich J. and Gassler H. (1994): An exploration into the determinants of patent activities. Some empirical evidence for Austria, Regional Studies 28(1), 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray D. (1997): Generation and distribution of technological knowledge: Incentives, norms and institutions. In: Edquist C. (ed.) Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter, London, pp. 65–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray D. (1994): Production and distribution of knowledge in the new Systems of innovation: The role of intellectual property rights, STI-Review 14, 119–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray D. and Lundvall B.-Å. (1996): The knowledge-based economy: From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. In: OECD (ed.) Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-based Economy, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, pp. 11–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C. (1987): Japan: A New National System of Innovation? Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp H. (1990): Technometrics as a missing link in science and technology indicators. In: Sigurdson J. (ed.) Measuring the Dynamics of Technological Change, Pinter, London, pp. 57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks D. (2000): Using innovation indicators for assessing the efficiency of industry-science relationships. Paper presented at the Joint German-OECD Conference “Benchmarking Industry-Science Relations”, Berlin, 16–17 October 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks D., Isard P. and Martin B. (1996): A morphology of Japanese and European corporate research networks, Research Policy 25(3), 359–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks D., Isard P. and Martin B. (1993): University-industry alliances as revealed by joint publications, Mimeo, SPRU

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe A.B. (1989): Real effects of academic research, American Economic Review 79(5), 957–970

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe A.M., Trajtenberg M. and Henderson R. (1993): Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3), 577–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joly P.B. and Mangematin V. (1996): Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R&D: The dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation, Research Policy 25(6), 901–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz J.S. and Martin B.R. (1997): What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26(1), 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly K.-J., Weber J., Friend S., Atchinson G., DeGeorge W. and Holstein W. (1992): Hot spots. America’s new growth regions are blossoming despite the slump, Business Week October 29, 80–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Klevorick A.K., Levin R.C., Nelson R.R. and Winter S.G. (1995): On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities, Research Policy 24(2), 185–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline S.J. (1985): Innovation is not a linear process, Research Management 28, 36–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B.-Å. (ed.) (1992): National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B.-Å. (1988): Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R.R., Silverberg G. and Soete L. (eds.) Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, pp. 349–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup F. (1980): Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution and Economic Significance. Knowledge and Knowledge Production, Volume 1, Princeton University, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • MacPherson A. (1997): The role of producer-service outsourcing in the innovation performance of New York State manufacturing firms, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87(1), 52–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E. (1997): Links between academic research and industrial innovations. In: David P. and Steinmueller E. (eds.) A Production Tension: University-Industry Collaboration in the Era of Knowledge-Based Economic Development, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E. (1995): Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing, The Review of Economics and Statistics 77(1), 55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E. and Lee J.-Y. (1996): The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support, Research Policy 25(7), 1047–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Krahmer F. and Schmoch U. (1998): Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields, Research Policy 27(8), 835–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R.R. (ed.) (1993): National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study, Oxford University Press, Oxford [UK]

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R.R. and Rosenberg N. (1993): Technical innovation and national systems. In: Nelson R.R. (ed.) National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study, Oxford University Press, Oxford [UK], pp. 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000a): Science, technology and industry outlook 2000: Innovation networks, DSTI/STP/TIP(2000)5, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000b): Analytical report on high tech spin-offs, DSTI/STP/TIP(2000)7, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1998): National innovation systems: Analytical findings, DSTI/STP/TIP(98)6, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Oinas P. (1999): The difference that space makes in organisational learning. Paper presented at the 39th European Congress of the Regional Science Association 1999, 23–27 August 1999, Dublin, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver N. and Blakeborough M. (1998): The multi-firm new product development process. In: Grieve-Smith J. and Michie J. (eds.) Innovation, Cooperation and Growth, Oxford University Press, Oxford [UK], pp. 151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker D. and Zilberman D. (1993): University technology transfers: Impacts on local and U.S. economies, Contemporary Policy Issues 11, 87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K. (1998): The social shaping of the national science base, Research Policy 27(8), 793–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees G. (1991): New information technologies and vocational education and training in the new information technologies in the European Community, Background Report [Commission of the European Communities], Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell R. (1991): External networking and innovation in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms in Europe, Technovation 11, 93–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti P.P. (1998): On the dynamics of appropriability, of tacit and codified knowledge, Research Policy 26(7/8), 843–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schartinger D., Schibany A. and Gassler H. (2001): Interactive relations between university and industry: Empirical evidence for Austria, Journal of Technology Transfer 26(3), 255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schartinger D., Rammer C., Fischer M.M. and Fröhlich J. (2000): The role of space in research co-operation between university and firms, Discussion Paper, Department of Systems Research, Austrian Research Centers Seibersdorf, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Schibany A., Jörg L. and Polt W. (1999): Towards realistic expectations. The science system as a contributor to industrial innovation. Study by the Working Association TIP in Commission of the Austrian Federal Ministries of Economic Affairs and Science and Transport, Department of Systems Research, Austrian Research Centers Seibersdorf, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch U. (1999): Interaction of universities and industrial enterprises in Germany and the United States. A comparison, Industry and Innovation 6(1), 51–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch U., Licht G. and Reinhard M. (2000): Wissens-und Technologietransfer in Deutschland, IRB Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel D., Waldman D. and Link A. (1999): Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study, NBER Working Paper 7256, Cambridge [MA]

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith K. (1995): Interactions in knowledge systems: Foundations, policy implications and empirical methods, STI-Review 16, 69–102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fröhlich, J. (2006). Knowledge Interactions between Universities and Industry in Austria: Sectoral Patterns and Determinants. In: Innovation, Networks, and Knowledge Spillovers. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35981-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics