Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Althoff, K., Birk, A., Hartkopf, S. and Müller, W. (1999). Managing software engineering experience for comprehensive reuse. In Procedings of ICSE’99, Kaiserslautern, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertoa, M.F. and Vallecillo, A.(2002). Quality Attributes for COTS Components. I+D Computación, 1(2):128–144.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Briand, L., Morasca, S. and Basili, V. (2002). An operational process for goal-driven definition of measures. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(12):1106–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. García, F., Ruiz, F., Bertoa, M., Calero, C., Genero, M., Olsina, L.A., Martín, M.A., Quer, C., Condori, N., Abrahao, S., Vallecillo, A. and Piattini M. (2004). An ontology for software measurement. Technical Report UCLM DIAB-04-02-2, Computer Science Department, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain, (in Spanish) http://www.info-ab.uclm.es/descargas/thecnicalreports/DIAB-04-02-2/UCLMDIAB-04-02-2.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  5. García, F., Bertoa, M., Calero, C., Vallecillo, A., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M. and Genero, M. (2006). Towards a consistent terminology for software measurement. Information and Software Technology, 48(8),. Elsevier 631–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gómez-Pérez, A. (1998). Knowledge Sharing and Reuse. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  7. IEEE (1990). STD 610.12-1990. Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. http://standars.ieee.org/reading/ieee/std_public/description/se/610.12-1990_desc.html

    Google Scholar 

  8. IEEE (1998). IEEE Std 1061–1998 IEEE Standard for a Software Quality Metrics Methodology — Description. http://standards.ieee.org/reading/ieee/std_public/description/se/1061-1998_desc.html

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO/ IEC (1999). ISO 14598: 1999–2001. Information Technology-Software Product Evaluation — Parts 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ISO/ IEC (2002). ISO 15939: Software Engineering — Software Measurement Process.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISO/ IEC (2004a). ISO/IEC 15504-1:2003, Information technology — Process assessment — Part 1: Concepts and vocabulary.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO/ IEC (2004b). ISO/IEC 90003, Software and Systems Engineering — Guidelines for the Application of ISO/IEC 9001:2000 to Computer Software.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ISO (1993). International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (ISO VIM). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, C. (2003). Making Measurement Work. CROSSTALK The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, pp. 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, H. (1999). Representing and Reasoning about Quality using Enterprise Models. PhD thesis, Dept. Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kitchenham, B., Hughes, R. and Linkman, S. (2001). Modeling software measurement data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27(9):788–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McGarry, J., Card, D., Jones, C., Layman, B., Clark, E., Dean, J. and Hall, F. (2002). Practical Software Measurement. Objective Information for Decision Makers. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tautz, C. and Von Wangenheim, C. (1998). REFSENO: A representation formalism for software engineering ontologies. Technical Report No. 015.98/E, version 1.1, Fraunhofer IESE, October.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Staab, S., Schnurr, H. and Sure, Y. (2001). Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(1):26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Uschold, M. and Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, methods, and applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2):93–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bertoa, M.F., Vallecillo, A., García, F. (2006). An Ontology for Software Measurement. In: Calero, C., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M. (eds) Ontologies for Software Engineering and Software Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34518-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34518-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34517-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34518-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics