Skip to main content

Evaluating Different Approaches to Measuring the Similarity of Melodies

  • Conference paper
Data Science and Classification

Abstract

This paper describes an empirical approach to evaluating similarity measures for the comparision of two note sequences or melodies. In the first sections the experimental approach and the empirical results of previous studies on melodic similarity are reported. In the discussion section several questions are raised that concern the nature of similarity or distance measures for melodies and musical material in general. The approach taken here is based on an empirical comparision of a variety of similarity measures with experimentally gathered rating data from human music experts. An optimal measure is constructed on the basis of a linear model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • DOWNIE, J.S. (1999): Evaluating a Simple Approach to Musical Information retrieval: Conceiving Melodic N-grams as Text. PhD thesis, University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRIELER, K. (2004). Beat and Meter Extraction Using Gaussified Onsets. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 178–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • JUHASZ, Z. (2000): A Model of Variation in the Music of a Hungarian Ethnic Group. Journal of New Music Research, 29/2, 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KAISER, H.F. (1974): An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • KLUGE, R. (1974): Faktorenanalytische Typenbestimmung an Volksliedmelodien. Leipzig: WEB Deutscher Verlag für Musik.

    Google Scholar 

  • KRUMHANSL, C. (1990): Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCNAB, R.J., SMITH, L. A., WITTEN, I.H., HENDERSON, C.L. and CUNNINGHAM, S.J. (1996). Towards the Digital Music Library: Tune Retrieval from Acoustic Input. In: Proceedings ACM Digital Libraries, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEEK, C. and BIRMINGHAM, W. (2002): Johnny Can’t Sing: A Comprehensive Error Model for Sung Music Queries. In: ISMIR 2002 Conference Proceedings, IRCAM, 124–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’MAIDIN, D. (1998): A Geometrical Algorithm for Melodic Difference in Melodic Similarity. In: W.B. Hewlett & Eleanor Selfridge-Field. Melodic Similarity: Concepts, Procedures, and Applications. Computing in Musicology 11. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • MÜLLENSIEFEN, D. (2004): Variabilität und Konstanz von Melodien in der Erinnerung. Ein Beitrag zur musikpsychologischen Gedächtnisforschung. PhD work, University of Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • MÜLLENSIEFEN, D. and FRIELER, K. (2004a): Cognitive Adequacy in the Measurement of Melodic Similarity: Algorithmic vs. Human Judgments. Computing in Musicology, 13, 147–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • MÜLLENSIEFEN, D. and FRIELER, K. (2004b): Melodic Similarity: Approaches and Applications. In: S. Lipscomb, R. Ashley, R. Gjerdingen and P. Webster (Eds.). Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (CD-R).

    Google Scholar 

  • MÜLLENSIEFEN, D. and FRIELER, K. (2004c): Optimizing Measures of Melodic Similarity for the Exploration of a Large Folk-Song Database. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 274–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • MÜLLENSIEFEN, D. and HENNIG, CH. (2005): Modeling Memory for Melodies. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the German Society for Classification (GfKl). Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • OURA, Y. and HATANO, G. (1988): Memory for Melodies among Subjects Differing in Age and Experience in Music. Psychology of Music 1988, 16, 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAGRILLO, D. (1999): Melodiegestalten im luxemburgischen Volkslied: Zur Anwendung computergestützter Verfahren bei der Klassifikation von Volksliedabschnitten. Bonn, Holos.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHMUCKLER, M.A. (1999): Testing Models of Melodic Contour Similarity. Music Perception 16/3, 109–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • SLOBODA, J.A. and PARKER, D.H.H. (1985): Immediate Recall of Melodies. In: I. Cross, P. Howell and R. West. (Eds.). Musical Structure and Cognition. Academic Press, London, 143–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEIBECK, W. (1982): Struktur und Ähnlichkeit: Methoden automatisierter Melodieanalyse. Bärenreiter, Kassel.

    Google Scholar 

  • TYPKE, R., GIANNOPOULOS, P., VELTKAMP, R.C., WIERING, F., and VAN OOSTRUM, R. (2003): Using Transportation Distances for Measuring Melodic Similarity. In: ISMIR 2003:Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • UITDENBOGERD, A.L. (2002): Music Information Retrieval Technology. PhD thesis, RMIT University Melbourne Victoria, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZIELINSKA, H. and MIKLASZEWSKI, K. (1992): Memorising Two melodies of Different Style. Psychology of Music 20, 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Müllensiefen, D., Frieler, K. (2006). Evaluating Different Approaches to Measuring the Similarity of Melodies. In: Batagelj, V., Bock, HH., Ferligoj, A., Žiberna, A. (eds) Data Science and Classification. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34416-0_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics