Skip to main content

Mining Association Rules in Folksonomies

  • Conference paper
Data Science and Classification

Abstract

Social bookmark tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such systems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies. These systems provide currently relatively few structure. We discuss in this paper, how association rule mining can be adopted to analyze and structure folksonomies, and how the results can be used for ontology learning and supporting emergent semantics. We demonstrate our approach on a large scale dataset stemming from an online system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AGRAWAL, R., IMIELINSKI, T. and SWAMI, A. (1993): Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In: Proc. of SIGMOD 1993, pp. 207–216. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONNOTEA (2005): Connotea Mailing List. https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/connotea-discuss.

    Google Scholar 

  • GANTER, B. and WILLE, R. (1999): Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical foundations. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAMMOND, T., HANNAY, T., LUND, B. and SCOTT, J. (2005): Social Bookmarking Tools (I): A General Review. D-Lib Magazine, 11(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • HOTHO, A., JÄSCHKE, R., SCHMITZ, C. and STUMME, G. (2006): Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking. In: submitted for publication at ESWC 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEHMANN, F. and WILLE, R. (1995): A triadic approach to Formal Concept Analysis. In: G. Ellis, R. Levinson, W. Rich and J. F. Sowa (Eds.), Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory, vol. 954 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. ISBN 3-540-60161-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • HANNAY, T. (2005): Social Bookmarking Tools (II): A Case Study-Connotea. D-Lib Magazine, 11(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • MATHES, A. (2004): Folksonomies — Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIKA, P. (2005): Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics. In: Y. Gil, E. Motta, V. R. Benjamins and M. A. Musen (Eds.), ISWC 2005, vol. 3729 of LNCS, pp. 522–536. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • PASQUIER, N., BASTIDE, Y., TAOUIL, R. and LAKHAL, L. (1999): Closed set based discovery of small covers for association rules. In: Actes des 15mes journes Bases de Donnes Avances (BDA’99), pp. 361–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • STAAB, S., SANTINI, S., NACK, F., STEELS, L. and MAEDCHE, A. (2002): Emergent semantics. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 17(1):78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STEELS, L. (1998): The Origins of Ontologies and Communication Conventions in Multi-Agent Systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 1(2):169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STUMME, G. (1999): Conceptual Knowledge Discovery with Frequent Concept Lattices. FB4-Preprint 2043, TU Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • STUMME, G. (2002): Efficient Data Mining Based on Formal Concept Analysis. In: A. Hameurlain, R. Cicchetti and R. Traunmller (Eds.), Proc. DEXA 2002, vol. 2453 of LNCS, pp. 534–546. Springer, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • STUMME, G. (2005): A Finite State Model for On-Line Analytical Processing in Triadic Contexts. In: B. Ganter and R. Godin (Eds.), ICFCA, vol. 3403 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 315–328. Springer. ISBN 3-540-24525-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILLE, R. (1982): Restructuring lattices theory: An approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In: I. Rival (Ed.), Ordered Sets, pp. 445–470. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZAKI, M. J. and HSIAO, C.-J. (1999): ChARM: An efficient algorithm for closed association rule mining. Technical Report 99-10. Tech. rep., Computer Science Dept., Rensselaer Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schmitz, C., Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Stumme, G. (2006). Mining Association Rules in Folksonomies. In: Batagelj, V., Bock, HH., Ferligoj, A., Žiberna, A. (eds) Data Science and Classification. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34416-0_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics