Skip to main content

Comparison of Newton’s Integral in the Space and Frequency Domains

  • Conference paper
A Window on the Future of Geodesy

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 128))

Abstract

Newton’s integral can be evaluated either in the space domain by a direct integration approach or in the frequency domain by a spherical harmonic approach. In the first approach Newton’s integral is evaluated by a discretised numerical integration using the gravitational potential (or its derivatives) caused by regularly shaped bodies such as prisms or tesseroids (i.e., spherical or elliptical volume elements, respectively). The second approach expresses Newton’s integral by spherical harmonic expansions of height or density functions, which can be interpreted as the gravitational effect of different mass layers. This paper studies the theoretical and practical differences between both approaches. The gravitational effect of the global topographic masses, described here by equivalent rock heights, is evaluated using both approaches and the results compared. Numerical results for the gravitational potential are given for evaluation points located directly on the Earth’s surface and at different heights (e.g., flight levels) above it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson EG (1976): The effect of topography on solutions of Stokes’s problem. UNISURV Report S14, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia, pp. 252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical Geodesy, Freeman, San Francisco, 364 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand FB (1974) Introduction to numerical analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York (reprinted 1987 by Dover Publications, New York, 669 pp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes SA, Featherstone WE (2002) A unified approach to the Clenshaw summation and the recursive computation of very high degree and order normalised associated Legendre functions, J Geod 76: 279–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn M (2002) On the indirect effect of Helmert’s condensation methods. International Geoid Service Bulletin 13: 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn M, Featherstone WE (2003a) On the optimal spatial resolution of crustal mass distributions for forward gravity field modelling. In Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and Geoid 2002, Proceedings of the 3rd meeting of the International Gravity and Geoid Commission, Thessaloniki, Greece, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn M, Featherstone WE (2003b, this issue) Construction of a synthetic Earth gravity model by forward gravity modelling. Paper presented at the General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, June–July, 2003, Sapporo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck K (1988) Geophysical Geodesy — The slow deformation of the Earth. Univ. Press, Oxford, 718 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine FG and 14 other authors (1998) The development of the NASA GSFC and National Imaginary and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. Rep. NASA/TP-1998-206861, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Maryland, 575 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader K (1951) Das Newtonsche Raumpotential prismatischer Körper und seine Ableitung bis zur written Ordnung. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen, Sonderheft 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy D (1966) The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism. Geophysics 31: 362–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2000) The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism, J Geod 74: 552–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2002) Corrections to "The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism", J Geod 76: 475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramillen G (2002) Gravity/magnetic potential of uneven shell topography, J Geod 76: 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitz K, Heck B (2003) Efficient calculation of topographic reductions by the use of tesseroids. Presentation at the joint assembly of the EGS, AGU and EUG, Nice, France, 6–11 April 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuhn, M., Seitz, K. (2005). Comparison of Newton’s Integral in the Space and Frequency Domains. In: Sansò, F. (eds) A Window on the Future of Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 128. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27432-4_66

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics