Skip to main content

Comparison of new Geoid Models and EIGEN-2S in the North Atlantic Region

  • Conference paper
A Window on the Future of Geodesy

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 128))

Abstract

A set of new gravity data, not previously available in the Nordic NKG data base, was obtained from NIMA. Based on existing gravity data and these additional data several different new geoids were estimated. The inclusion of the NIMA data set give local geoid changes of up to a few dm.

The new CHAMP based EIGEN-2S geopotential model was compared to the EGM96 model using a two step procedure. Results from the two steps show that the EIGEN-2S geopotential model give better fit to GPS and MSSH/MDT data than EGM96 up to degree 50, but applying the full EGM96 model still gives the best resulting geoid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersen, O. (2003). Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, O. B. and Knudsen, P. (1998). Global marine gravity field from the ERS-1 and GEOSAT geodetic mission altimetry. J. Geophys. Res., 103(C4), 8129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, R. (2000). New geoid from Greeland to the Ural Mountains. Joint Baltic and Nordic Gravity and Geoid Meeting, Tallin, Estonia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, S. (2003). Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine, F., Smith, D., Pavlis, E., Pavlis, N., Klosko, S., Chinn, D., Torrence, M., Williamson, R., Cox, C., Rachlin, K., and Wang, Y. (1996). The development of the NASA/GSFC and DMA joint geopotential model. In Proc. Int. Symp. of Gravity, Geoid and Marine Geodesy (GRAGEOMAR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigber, C., Schwintzer, P., Neumayer, H., Barthelmes, F., Koenig, R., Förste, C., Balmino, G., Biancale, R., Lemoine, J.-M., Loyer, S., Bruinsma, S., Perosanz, F., and Fayard, T. (accepted Jan. 2003). The champ-only earth gravity field model. Advances in Space Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Omang, O.C.D., Forsberg, R., Strykowski, G. (2005). Comparison of new Geoid Models and EIGEN-2S in the North Atlantic Region. In: Sansò, F. (eds) A Window on the Future of Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 128. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27432-4_52

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics