Skip to main content

PLS Typological Regression: Algorithmic, Classification and Validation Issues

  • Conference paper
New Developments in Classification and Data Analysis

Abstract

Classification, within a PLS regression framework, is classically meant in the sense of the SIMCA methodology, i.e. as the assignment of statistical units to a-priori defined classes. As a matter of fact, PLS components are built with the double objective of describing the set of explanatory variables while predicting the set of response variables. Taking into account this objective, a classification algorithm is developed that allows to build typologies of statistical units whose different local PLS models have an intrinsic explanatory power higher than the initial global PLS model. The typology induced by the algorithm may undergo a non parametric validation procedure based on bootstrap. Finally, the definition of a compromise model is investigated.

This paper is financially supported by the EU project ESIS IST-2000-21071.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AMATO, S. (2003): Validazione non parametrica nella regressione Partial Least Squares. Tesi di Dottorato. Università di Napoli “Federico II”, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARKER, M. and RAYENS, W. (2003): Partial Least Squares paradigm for Discrimination. Journal of chemometrics 17: 1–8. United Kingdom.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DE JONG, S. (1993): PLS fits closer than PCR, short communication. Journal of Chemometrics, 17:166–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERIKSSON, L., JOHANSSON, E., KETTANEH-WOLD, N. and WOLD, S. (1999): Multi and Megavariate Data Analysis using Projection Methods. Umetrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAURO C. and ESPOSITO VINZI, V. (2002): Exploring, Modelling and Classifying with PLS. Opening lecture at the 26th Annual Conference of the GFKL. Mannheim, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAZRAQ, A. and CLÈROUX, R (2001): The PLS multivariate regression model: testing the significance of successive PLS components. Journal of Chemometrics. 15:523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SJÖSTRÖM, M., WOLD, S. and SÖDERSTERÖM, B. (1986): PLS Discriminant Plots. In: Proceedeings of PARC in Practice. Elsevier, Noth Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • TENENHAUS, M. (1998): La régression PLS. Technip. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOLD S., ALBANO, C, DUNN, W.J., EDLUND, U., ESBENSEN, K., GELADI, P., HELLBERG, S., JOHANSSON, E., LINDBERG, W., and SJÖSTRÖM, M. (1984): Multivariate Data Analysis in Chemistry. SIAM Journal of Scientific and Statistical Computing, 5, 735–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vinzi, V.E., Lauro, C.N., Amato, S. (2005). PLS Typological Regression: Algorithmic, Classification and Validation Issues. In: Bock, HH., et al. New Developments in Classification and Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27373-5_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics