Skip to main content

Safety Considerations in Interventional MRI

  • Chapter
Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) techniques are not harmful, as the electromagnetic fields used in this technique do not have permanent or harmful effects on living tissue, as long as the MR examination is performed properly. Especially with interventional imaging, the absence of ionizing radiation is an advantage not only for the patient, but even more so for the operator. However, MR imaging is not free from hazards. In the case of inadvertence, substantial damage is possible. The strong static magnetic field, the radiofrequency field, and the switched gradient fields have different physical effects and thus different risks emerge. Owing to the specific requirements for interventional procedures, the significant danger from ferromagnetic objects that are brought into the range of the static field and can be drawn towards the scanner with considerable force is even larger than in standard imaging. Depending on the specific environment, strict safety precautions, which address all potential hazards in all possible situations, must be implemented and personnel must be trained specifically for interventions at or near an MR scanner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archibold RC (2001) Hospital details failures leading to M.R.I. fatality. New York Times, 22 Aug 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM International (2008) F2503-08. Standard practice for marking medical devices and other items for safety in the magnetic resonance environment. In: Annual book of ASTM standards, vol 13.02. Medical and surgical materials and devices (II): F2502-latest. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. doi:10.1520/F2503-08

  • ASTM International (2011) F2182-11a. Standard test method for measurement of radio frequency induced heating on or near passive implants during magnetic resonance imaging. In: Annual book of ASTM standards, vol 13.01. Medical and surgical materials and devices (I): E667-F2477. ASTM International, West Conshohocken. doi:10.1520/F2182-11A

  • Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA, Schaefer DJ (1999) Physiologic effects of intense MR gradient fields. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 9:363–377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen DW (2001) Boy, 6, dies of skull injury during MRI. New York Times, 31 July 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier S, Wang H, Trakic A, Liu F (2007) Exposure of workers to pulsed gradients in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1236–1254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes MA, Trakic A, Wilson SJ, Crozier S (2008) Analysis and measurement of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected ME environments. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55:1355–1364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graf H, Lauer UA, Schick F (2006) Eddy-current induction in extended metallic parts as a source of considerable torsional moment. J Magn Reson Imaging 23:585–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy PT, Weil KM (2010) A review of thermal MR injuries. Radiol Technol 81:606–609

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hushek SG, Martin AJ, Steckner M, Bosak E, Debbins J, Kucharzyk W (2008) MR systems for MRI-guided interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:253–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 74:494–522

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (2010) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health Phys 99:818–836

    Google Scholar 

  • International Electrotechnical Commission (2010) Medical electrical equipment––part 2-33: particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis. International standard IEC 60601-2-33: International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Borgstede JP, Bradley WG Jr, Froelich JW, Gilk T, Gimbel JR, Gosbee J, Kuhni-Kaminski EM, Keeler EK, Lester JW Jr, Nyenhuis J, Parag Y, Schaefer DJ, Sebek-Scoumis EA, Weinreb J, Zaremba LA, Wilcox P, Lucey L, Sass N (2007) ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1447–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly WM, Paglen PG, Pearson JA, San Diego AG, Soloman MA (1986) Ferromagnetism of intraocular foreign body cause unilateral blindness after MR study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 7:243–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klucznik RP, Carrier DA, Pyka R, Haid RW (1993) Placement of a ferromagnetic intracerebral aneurysm clip in a magnetic field with a fatal outcome. Radiology 187:855–856

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knopp MV, Essig M, Debus J, Zabel HJ, van Kaick G (1996) Unusual burns of the lower extremities caused by a closed conducting loop in a patient at MR imaging. Radiology 200:572–575

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kugel H, Bremer C, Püschel M, Fischbach R, Lenzen H, Tombach B, Van Aken H, Heindel W (2003) Hazardous situation in the MR bore: induction in EEG leads causes fire. Eur Radiol 13:690–694

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (2012). http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfMAUDE/TextSearch.cfm. Accessed 21 Feb 2012

  • McJury M, Shellock F (2000) Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:37–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer DJ (1998) Safety aspects of switched gradient fields. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6:731–748

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schenck JF (2005) Physical interactions of static magnetic fields with living tissue. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87:185–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shellock FG, Crues JV III (2002) Commentary: MR safety and the American college of radiology white paper. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1349–1352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tope WD, Shellock FG (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging and permanent cosmetics (tattoos): survey of complications and adverse effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:180–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harald Kugel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kugel, H. (2012). Safety Considerations in Interventional MRI. In: Kahn, T., Busse, H. (eds) Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2012_570

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2012_570

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20705-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20706-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics