Skip to main content

Relating Business Process Models to Goal-Oriented Requirements Models in KAOS

  • Conference paper
Advances in Knowledge Acquisition and Management (PKAW 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4303))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Business Process Management (BPM) has many anticipated benefits including accelerated process improvement, at the operational level, with the use of highly configurable and adaptive “process aware” information systems [1] [2]. The facility for improved agility fosters the need for continual measurement and control of business processes to assess and manage their effective evolution, in-line with organizational objectives. This paper proposes the GoalBPM methodology for relating business process models (modeled using BPMN) to high-level stakeholder goals (modeled using KAOS). We propose informal (manual) techniques (with likely future formalism) for establishing and verifying this relationship, even in dynamic environments where essential alterations to organizational goals and/or process constantly emerge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Smith, H., Fingar, P.: Business Process Management: The Third Wave. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Tampa (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W.M., ter Hofstede, A.H.: Process-Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology. Wiley-Interscience, Chichester (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. McGoveran, D.: The benefits of a bpms. Technical report, Alternative Technologies, Felton, California, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van der Aalst, W., ter Hofstede, A., Weske, M.: Business Process Management: A Survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Youngblood, M.D.: Winning cultures for the new economy. Strategy and Leadership 28(6), 4–9 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kavakli, E.: Modelling organizational goals: Analysis of current methods. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Nicosia, CY, pp. 1339–1343 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pyke, J., Whitehead, R.: Do better maths lead to better business processes? Business Process Trends (2004), http://www.bptrends.com

  8. Wynn, D., Eckert, C., Clarkson, P.J.: Planning business processes in product development organisation s. In: REBPS 2003 - Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Busines s Process Support, Klagenfurt/Veldern, Austria (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Watkins, R., Neal, M.: Why and how of requirements tracing. IEEE Software 11(4), 104–106 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour. In: RE 2001 - International Joint Conference on Requirements Engineering, Toronto, pp. 249–263. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. White, S.: Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN), Version 1.0. Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI.org). 1.0 edn. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Letier, E., van Lamsweerde, A.: Deriving operational software. In: FSEí10 - 10th ACM SIGSOFT Symp. on the Foundations of Software Engineering (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Letier, E.: Reasoning about Agents in Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering. PhD thesis, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Lamsweerde, A., Letier, E.: Handling obstacles in goal-oriented requirements engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26(10), 978–1005 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bider, I., Johannesson, P.: Tutorial on: Modeling dynamics of business processes – key for building next generation of business information systems. in: The 21st international con-ference on conceptual modeling (er2002). In: 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER2002), Tampere, FL, October 7-11 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khomyakov, M., Bider, I.: Achieving workflow flexibility through taming the chaos. In: OOIS 2000 - 6th International Conference on Object Oriented Information Systems, pp. 85–92. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Andersson, T., Andersson-Ceder, A., Bider, I.: State flow as a way of analysing business processes - case studies. Logistics Information Management 15(1), 34–45 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koliadis, G., Ghose, A. (2006). Relating Business Process Models to Goal-Oriented Requirements Models in KAOS. In: Hoffmann, A., Kang, Bh., Richards, D., Tsumoto, S. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Acquisition and Management. PKAW 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4303. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11961239_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11961239_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68955-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68957-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics