Abstract
During the metadata creation based on Common Warehouse Metamodel(CWM), the different experiences and views of describing data of organizations involved in metadata creation bring metadata on some problems inevitably, such as inconsistencies and redundancies. However, reasoning on CWM metadata for automatically detecting these problems is difficult because CWM metamodel and metadata lack precise semantics. In this paper, we formalize and reason on CWM metamodel and metadata in terms of a logic belonging to Description Logics, which are subsets of First-Order Logic. We distinguish consistency into horizontal consistency and evolution consistency. Towards evolution consistency, we extend CWM metamodel with version capabilities so that reasoning about inconsistency caused by evolution can be done. Then reasoning engine LOOM is applied to check consistency for the above two situations, the results are encouraging.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baader, F., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Object Management Group. Common Warehouse Metamodel(CWM) Specification Version 1.1 (November 2001)
Poole, J., Chang, D., Tolbert, D., Mellor, D.: Common Warehouse Metamodel Developer’s Guide. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (2003)
Jane, B., Sarah, C., Hey Jessie, M.N.: Building Quality Assurance into Metadata Creation: an Analysis based on the Learning Objects and e-Prints Communities of Practice. In: Proceedings 2003 Dublin Core Conference: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice - Metadata Research and Applications(DCMI), Seattle, Washington, pp. 39–48 (2003)
Hauch, R., Miller, A., Cardwell, R.: Information intelligence: metadata for information discovery, access, and integration. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pp. 793–798 (2005)
Evans, A.S.: Reasoning with UML class diagrams. In: Second IEEE Workshop on Industrial Strength Formal Specification Techniques(WIFT 1998) (1998)
Simmonds, J.: Consistency maintenance of uml models with description logic. Master’s thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (September 2003)
Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M.: On the decidability of query containment under constraints. In: Proc. of the 17th ACM SIGACT SIGMOD SIGART Symp. on Principles of Database Systems(POD 1998), pp. 149–158 (1998)
Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M.: Identification constraints and functional dependencies in description logics. In: Proc. of the 17th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence(IJCAI 2001) (2001)
Haarslev, V., Moller, R.: RACER system description. In: Goré, R.P., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds.) IJCAR 2001. LNCS, vol. 2083, p. 701. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Finkelstein, A., Gabbay, D.M., Hunter, A., Kramer, J., Nuseibeh, B.: Inconsistency handling in multi-perspective specifications. In: European Software Engineering Conference, pp. 84–99 (1993)
Cali, A., Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M.: A formal framework for reasoning on UML class diagrams. In: Hacid, M.-S., Raś, Z.W., Zighed, D.A., Kodratoff, Y. (eds.) ISMIS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2366, pp. 503–513. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Brill, D.: LOOM reference manual, version 2.0 edition, University of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute (December 28, 1993)
Grundy, J.C., Hosking, J.G., Mugridge, W.B.: Inconsistency management for multiple-view software development environments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(11), 960–981 (1998)
Object Management Group. Unified Modeling Language specification version 1.4. (September 2001)
Finkelstein, A.: A Foolish Consistency: Technical Challenges in Consistency Management. In: Ibrahim, M., Küng, J., Revell, N. (eds.) DEXA 2000. LNCS, vol. 1873, p. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A.: Reasoning in description logics. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation, Studies in Logic, Language and Information, pp. 193–238 (1996)
MacGregor, R.: Inside the LOOM description classifier. SIGART Bull 2(3), 88–92 (1991)
Horrocks, I.: FaCT and iFaCT. In: International Workshop on Description Logics(DL 1999), pp. 133–135 (1999)
Mens, T., D’Hondt, T.: Automating support for software evolution in uml. Automated Software Engineering Journal 7(1), 39–59 (2000)
Miller, J., Mukerji, J.: Model driven architecture (MDA). Draft ormsc/2001-07-01, Architecture Board ORMSC (July 2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhao, X., Huang, Z. (2006). A Formal Framework for Reasoning on Metadata Based on CWM. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2006. ER 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4215. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-47224-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47227-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)