Abstract
Evaluation of personalized information retrieval (IR) systems is challenged by the user effect, which is manifested in terms of users’ inconsistency in relevance judgment, ranking and relevance criteria usage. Two empirical studies on evaluating a personalized search engine were performed. Two types of relative measures computed with different mathematical formulae were compared. The ranking similarity and the randomness of relevance criteria usage were estimated. Results show some undesirable personalization effects. Implications for the future development and research of adaptive IR systems are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barry, C.L., Schamber, L.: Users criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison. IP&M 34(2/3), 219–236 (1998)
Bateman, J.: Changes in relevance criteria: A longitudinal study. In: Proceedings of the 61st Annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 35, pp. 23–32 (1998)
Borlund, P.: The concept of relevance in IR. JASIST 54(10), 913–925 (2003)
Borlund, P., Ingwersen, P.: Measurse of relative relevance and ranked half-life: performance indicators for interactive IR. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 1998, pp. 324–331 (1998)
Boyce, B.: Beyond topicality: A two stage view of relevance and retrieval process. IP&M 18, 105–109 (1982)
Brantner, S. (ed.): D4.4 Smart learning space description: the ELENA project, http://www.elena-project.org/en/index.asp?p=3-4
Buckley, C., Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information. In: SIGIR 2004, Sheffield, UK (2004)
Cosjin, E., Ingwersen, P.: Dimensions of relevance. IP&M 36, 533–550 (2000)
Crystal, A., Greenberg, J.: Relevance criteria identified by health information users during Web searches. JASIST (in press)
Elliot, M., Kling, R.: Organizational usability of digital libraries. JASIST 48(11), 1023–1035 (1997)
Ellis, D., Furner-Hines, J., Willett, P.: On the measurement of inter-linker consistency and retrieval effectiveness in hypertext databases. In: Proc. 17th SIGIR Conference, Dublin (Ireland), pp. 51–60 (1994)
Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience – a research agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology 25(2), 91–97 (2006)
Hertzum, M., Jacobsen, N.E.: The evaluator effect: A chilling fact about usability evaluation methods. Int’l. J. Human Computer Interaction 13(4), 421–443 (2001)
Jansen, B.J.: Seeking and implementing automated assistance during the search process. IP&M 41, 909–928 (2005)
Maglaughlin, K.L., Sonnenwald, D.H.: User perspectives on relevance critera: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments. JASIST 53(5), 327–342 (2002)
Magoulas, G.D., Chen, S.Y.C. (eds.): Proceedings of the Workshop in Individual Difference in Adaptive Hypermedia (2004), http://www.dcs.bbk.ac.uk/~gmagoulas/AH200_Workshop/Individual_Differences_WorkProc.pdf
McCarthy, J., Wright, P.C.: Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
Michel, C.: Poset representation and similarity comparisons of systems in IR. In: SIGIR Workshop on <Mathematical/Formal Methods in IR> (MF/IR 2003), Toronto, Canada (July 2003)
Mizzaro, S.: Relevance: the whole history. JASIST 48, 810–832 (1997)
Park, T.K.: Toward a theory of user-based relevance. JASIST 45, 135–141 (1994)
Saracevic, T.: Relevance reconsidered 1996. In: Ingwersen, P., Ole Pors, N. (eds.) CoLIS2, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 201–218 (1996)
Sloane, N.J.A., Wyner, A.D. (eds.): Claude Elwood Shannon: Collected Papers. IEEE Press, New York (1993)
Suchman, L.: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)
Swanson, D.R.: Subjective versus objective relevance in bibliographic retrieval systems. Library Quarterly 56, 389–398 (1986)
Tang, R., Solomon, P.: Use of relevance criteria across stages of document evaluation. JASIST 52(8), 676–685 (2001)
Voorhees, E.M.: Evaluation by highly relevant documents. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 74–82 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Law, E.LC., Klobučar, T., Pipan, M. (2006). User Effect in Evaluating Personalized Information Retrieval Systems. In: Nejdl, W., Tochtermann, K. (eds) Innovative Approaches for Learning and Knowledge Sharing. EC-TEL 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4227. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11876663_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11876663_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-45777-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46234-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)