Abstract
This paper proposes a methodology to analyze graph transformation systems by means of Alloy and its supporting tools. Alloy is a simple structural modeling language, based on first-order logic, that allows the user to produce models of software systems by abstracting their key characteristics. The tools can generate instances of invariants, and check properties of models, on user-constrained representations of the world under analysis. The paper describes how to render a graph transformation system —specified using AGG— as an Alloy model and how to exploit its tools to prove significant properties of the system. Specifically, it allows the user to decide whether a given configuration (graph) can be obtained through a finite and bounded sequence of steps (invocation of rules), whether a given sequence of rules can be applied on an initial graph, and, given an initial graph and an integer n, which are the configurations that can be obtained by applying a sequence of n (particular) rules.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arkoudas, K., Khurshid, S., Marinov, D., Rinard, M.: Integrating model checking and theorem proving for relational reasoning. In: Berghammer, R., Möller, B., Struth, G. (eds.) RelMiCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 3051, pp. 21–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Baldan, P., Corradini, A., König, B.: Verifying finite-state graph grammars: An unfolding-based approach. In: Gardner, P., Yoshida, N. (eds.) CONCUR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3170, pp. 83–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Baldan, P., König, B.: Approximating the behaviour of graph transformation systems. In: Proceedings of ICGT, pp. 14–29 (2002)
Baresi, L., Heckel, R.: Tutorial Introduction to Graph Transformation: A Software Engineering Perspective. In: Corradini, A., Ehrig, H., Kreowski, H.-J., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2505, pp. 402–429. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Baresi, L., Heckel, R., Thöne, S., Varró, D.: Modeling and validation of service-oriented architectures: Application vs. style. In: Proceedings of European Software Engineering Conference and ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 68–77. ACM Press, New York (2003)
Beyer, M.: AGG1.0 - Tutorial. Technical University of Berlin, Department of Computer Science (1992)
Csertán, G., Huszerl, G., Majzik, I., Pap, Z., Pataricza, A., Varró, D.: Viatra - visual automated transformations for formal verification and validation of UML models. In: Proceedings of ASE, pp. 267–270 (2002)
Dotti, F.L., Foss, L., Ribeiro, L., Marchi dos Santos, O.: Verification of distributed object-based systems. In: Najm, E., Nestmann, U., Stevens, P. (eds.) FMOODS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2884, pp. 261–275. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Frias, M., Lopez Pombo, C., Baum, G., Aguirre, N., Maibaum, T.: Reasoning about static and dynamic properties in alloy: A purely relational approach. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 14(4), 478–526 (2005)
Hausmann, J.H., Heckel, R., Taentzer, G.: Detection of conflicting functional requirements in a use case-driven approach: a static analysis technique based on graph transformation. In: Proceedings of ICSE, pp. 105–115 (2002)
Heckel, R.: Compositional verification of reactive systems specified by graph transformation. In: Astesiano, E. (ed.) ETAPS 1998 and FASE 1998. LNCS, vol. 1382, pp. 138–153. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Holzmann, G.J.: The model checker spin. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 23(5), 279–295 (1997)
Jackson, D.: Software Abstractions: Logic, Language, and Analysis. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)
Jackson, D., Shlyakhter, I., Sridharan, M.: A micromodularity mechanism. In: Proceedings of the 8th European software engineering conference held jointly with 9th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, pp. 62–73. ACM Press, New York (2001)
Kuske, S.: A formal semantics of UML state machines based on structured graph transformation. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, p. 241. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Rensink, A.: The GROOVE simulator: A tool for state space generation. In: Pfaltz, J.L., Nagl, M., Böhlen, B. (eds.) AGTIVE 2003. LNCS, vol. 3062, pp. 479–485. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Rensink, A., Schmidt, Á., Varró, D.: Model checking graph transformations: A comparison of two approaches. In: Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Parisi-Presicce, F., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3256, pp. 226–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Schmidt, Á., Varró, D.: CheckVML: A tool for model checking visual modeling languages. In: Stevens, P., Whittle, J., Booch, G. (eds.) UML 2003. LNCS, vol. 2863, pp. 92–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Baresi, L., Spoletini, P. (2006). On the Use of Alloy to Analyze Graph Transformation Systems. In: Corradini, A., Ehrig, H., Montanari, U., Ribeiro, L., Rozenberg, G. (eds) Graph Transformations. ICGT 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4178. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11841883_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11841883_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-38870-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38872-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)