Skip to main content

A Vector Space Model for Semantic Similarity Calculation and OWL Ontology Alignment

  • Conference paper
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4080))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Ontology alignment (or matching) is the operation that takes two ontologies and produces a set of semantic correspondences (usually semantic similarities) between some elements of one of them and some elements of the other. A rigorous, efficient and scalable similarity measure is a pre-requisite of an ontology alignment process. This paper presents a semantic similarity measure based on a matrix represention of nodes from an RDF labelled directed graph. An entity is described with respect to how it relates to other entities using N-dimensional vectors, being N the number of selected external predicates. We adapt a known graph matching algorithm when applying this idea to the alignment of two ontologies. We have successfully tested the model with the public testcases of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2005.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bisson, M.: Learning in fol with a similarity measure. In: Proceedings of the 10th American Association for Artificial Intelligence conference, San-Jose (CA, US), pp. 82–87 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web (2002), http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/doan02learning.html

  3. Ehrig, M., Euzenat, J.: Relaxed precision and recall for ontology matching, http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/intont2005/intontproceedings.pdf

  4. Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: Qom - quick ontology mapping, http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/727796.html

  5. Blondel, V.D., et al.: A measure of similarity between graph vertices: Applications to synonym extraction and web searching. SIAM Rev. 46(4), 647–666 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu, W., et al.: Gmo: A graph matching for ontologies. Integrating Ontologies (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Euzenat, J., Valtchev, P.: Similarity-based ontology alignment in owl-lite. In: Proc. of ECAI 2004, Valencia, Spain, August 2004, pp. 333–337 (August 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hopcroft, J.E., Karp, R.M.: An O(n 5/2) algorithm for maximum matching in bipartite graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 4, 225–231 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Leacock, C., Chodorow, M.: Combining local context and wordnet similarity for word sense identification. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database 49(2), 265–283 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, J.H., Kim, M.H., Lee, Y.J.: Information retrieval based on conceptual distance in is-a hierarchies. Journal of Documentation 49(2), 188–207 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ontology alignment evaluation initiative (2005), http://oaei.inrialpes.fr/2005/

  12. Owl web ontology language overview. w3c recommendation (February 10, 2004), See: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/

  13. Papadimitriou, C.H., Steiglitz, K.: Combinatorial optimization: algorithms and complexity. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB Journal: Very Large Data Bases 10(4), 334–350 (2001), http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/rahm01survey.html

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Resource description framework, See: http://www.w3.org/RDF/

  16. Salton, G.: The smart retrieval system. Experiments in Automatic Document Processing (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verbs semantics and lexical selection. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA, pp. 133–138. Association for Computational Linguistics (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tous, R., Delgado, J. (2006). A Vector Space Model for Semantic Similarity Calculation and OWL Ontology Alignment. In: Bressan, S., Küng, J., Wagner, R. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4080. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11827405_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11827405_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37871-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37872-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics