Skip to main content

Learning Factors Analysis – A General Method for Cognitive Model Evaluation and Improvement

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4053))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A cognitive model is a set of production rules or skills encoded in intelligent tutors to model how students solve problems. It is usually generated by brainstorming and iterative refinement between subject experts, cognitive scientists and programmers. In this paper we propose a semi-automated method for improving a cognitive model called Learning Factors Analysis that combines a statistical model, human expertise and a combinatorial search. We use this method to evaluate an existing cognitive model and to generate and evaluate alternative models. We present improved cognitive models and make suggestions for improving the intelligent tutor based on those models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baffes, P., Mooney, R.J.: A Novel Application of Theory Refinement to Student Modeling. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1996), Portland OR, pp. 403–408 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes, T.: The Q-matrix Method: Mining Student Response Data for Knowledge. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2005 Educational Data Mining Workshop (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cen, H., Koedinger, K., Junker, B.: Automating Cognitive Model Improvement by A*Search and Logistic Regression. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2005 Educational Data Mining Workshop (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R., O’Brien, A.T.: Student Modelling in the ACT Programming Tutor. In: Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4, 253–278 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Croteau, E.A., Heffernan, N.T., Koedinger, K.R.: Why are algebra word problems difficult? Using tutorial log files and the power law of learning to select the best fitting cognitive model. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 240–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Draney, K., Pirolli, P., Wilson, M.: A Measurement Model for a Complex Cognitive Skill. In: Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Junker, B.W., Koedinger, K., Trottini, M.: Finding Improvements in Student Models for Intelligent Tutoring Systems via Variable Selection for a Linear Logistic Test Model. Presented at annual meeting of Psychometric Society Vancouver BC (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koedinger, K.R.: (2000), http://pact.cs.cmu.edu/koedinger/koedingerResearch.html

  10. Koedinger, K.R., Mathan, S.: Distinguishing Qualitatively Different Kinds of Leaning Using Log Files and Learning Curves. In: Proc. of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koedinger, K.R., Nathan, M.J.: The Real Story Behind Story Problems: Effects Of Representations On Quantitative Reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13(2), 129–164 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H., Mark, M.A.: Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City. In: Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Art, Intelligence and Education, AACE (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P.: Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice. In: Anderson, J. (ed.) Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tatsuoka, K.: Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 20(4), 345–354 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ur, S., VanLehn, K.: STEPS: A Simulated, Tutorable Physics Student. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 6(4), 405–437 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wasserman, L.: All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cen, H., Koedinger, K., Junker, B. (2006). Learning Factors Analysis – A General Method for Cognitive Model Evaluation and Improvement. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, TW. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4053. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35159-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35160-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics