Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Language of Folksonomies: What Tags Reveal About User Classification

  • Conference paper
Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (NLDB 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3999))

Abstract

Folksonomies are classification schemes that emerge from the collective actions of users who tag resources with an unrestricted set of key terms. There has been a flurry of activity in this domain recently with a number of high profile web sites and search engines adopting the practice. They have sparked a great deal of excitement and debate in the popular and technical literature, accompanied by a number of analyses of the statistical properties of tagging behavior. However, none has addressed the deep nature of folksonomies. What is the nature of a tag? Where does it come from? How is it related to a resource? In this paper we present a study in which the linguistic properties of folksonomies reveal them to contain, on the one hand, tags that are similar to standard categories in taxonomies. But on the other hand, they contain additional tags to describe class properties. The implications of the findings for the relationship between folksonomy and ontology are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barsalou, L.W.: Deriving categories to achieve goals. In: Bower, G. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. Academic Press, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barsalou, W.: Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition 11(3), 211–227 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Golder, S., Huberman, B.A.: The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems (2005), http://www.citebase.org/cgi-bin/citations?id=oai:arXiv.org:cs/0508082

  4. Gruber, T.: Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges (January 19, 2006), http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-of-folksonomy.htm#_edn4

  5. Hepp, M.: Products and Services Ontologies: A Methodology for Deriving OWL Ontologies from Industrial Categorization Standards. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 2(1), 72–99 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koivunen, M.-R., Swick, R.R.: Metadata Based Annotation Infrastructure offers Flexibility and Extensibility for Collaborative Applications. In: KCAP workshop on Knowledge markup and semantic annotation (2001), http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/Papers/KCAP01/annotea.html

  7. Koivunen, M.-R.: Annotea and Semantic Web Supported Collaboration, http://kmi.open.ac.uk/events/usersweb/papers/01_koivunen_final.pdf

  8. Marieke, G., Tonkin, E.: Folksonomies Tidying up Tags? D-Lib Magazine 12(1) (2006), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html ISSN 1082-9873

  9. Mathes, A.: Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata, http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html

  10. Udell, J.: Collaborative knowledge gardening. InfoWorld (August 20, 2004), http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/08/20/34OPstrategic_1.html

  11. Veres, C.: Aggregation in ontologies: Practical implementations in OWL. In: Lowe, D.G., Gaedke, M. (eds.) ICWE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3579, pp. 285–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Veres, C.: Automatically Generating Aggregations for Ontologies from Database Schema: some alternatives to type hierarchies. In: Collard, M. (ed.) ODBIS 2005/2006. LNCS, vol. 4623. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Veres, C., Sampson, J.: Ontology and Taxonomy: Why “is-a” still isn’t just “is-a”. In: Proceedings of The 2005 International Conference on e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, e-Government, and Outsourcing. Las Vegas, Nevada (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wierzbicka, A.: Apples are not a ‘kind of fruit’: the semantics of human categorization. American Ethnologist, 313–328 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

    Csaba Veres

Authors
  1. Csaba Veres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Applied Informatics, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Austria

    Christian Kop  & Heinrich C. Mayr  & 

  2. Lab. CEDRIC, CNAM, Paris, France

    Elisabeth Métais

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Veres, C. (2006). The Language of Folksonomies: What Tags Reveal About User Classification. In: Kop, C., Fliedl, G., Mayr, H.C., Métais, E. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. NLDB 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3999. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11765448_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11765448_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34616-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34617-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation