Skip to main content

Operational Modelling of Agent Autonomy: Theoretical Aspects and a Formal Language

  • Conference paper
Agent-Oriented Software Engineering VI (AOSE 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3950))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Autonomy has always been conceived as one of the defining attributes of intelligent agents. While the past years have seen considerable progress regarding theoretical aspects of autonomy, and while autonomy has been identified as an enabler for new computing paradigms such as grid computing, (web-)service-oriented computing or ubiquitous computing, autonomy as a software property is still miles away from implementation. Because of the legal responsibility of designers or users for the actions of autonomous software, the implementation of autonomy will require rigorous modelling and verification, so as to ensure maximum dependability. We take a first step in this direction by introducing a formal language ASL (Autonomy Specification Language) that allows for a precise specification of the activities to be carried out by a set of agents, the deontic constraints imposed on these activities, and the implications of activity execution on particular constraints (i.e., constraint dynamics). Agent autonomy is implicit in an ASL specification as the degrees of freedom left to the agents for the execution of activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Damianou, N., Dulay, N., Lupu, E., Sloman, M.: The ponder policy specification language. In: Sloman, M., Lobo, J., Lupu, E.C. (eds.) POLICY 2001. LNCS, vol. 1995, Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Dignum, F.: Autonomous agents with norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7, 69–79 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dignum, V.: A model for organizational interaction: based on agents, founded in logic. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Esteva, M.: Eletronic institutions: from specification to development. PhD thesis, IIIA, Spain (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hexmoor, H., Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Agent autonomy. Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations (MASA), vol. 7. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Lopez y Lopez, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Constraining autonomy through norms. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lupu, E., Sloman, M.: Towards a role based framework for distributed systems management. Journal of Network and Systems Management 5(1), 5–30 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Müller, H.-J., Dieng, R. (eds.): Computational conflicts. Conflict modeling for distributed intelligent systems. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Musliner, D., Pell, B.: Agents with adjustable autonomy. Papers from the AAAI spring symposium. Technical Report SS-99-06, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M., Weiss, G. (eds.): AUTONOMY 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2969. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pacheco, O., Carmo, J.: A role based model for the normative specification of organized collective agency and agents interaction. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (JAAMAS) 6(2), 125–184 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Salceda, J.: The role of norms and electronic institutions in multi-agent systems applied to complex domains. PhD thesis, Technical University of Catalonia, Spain (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tessier, C., Chaudron, L., Müller, H.-J. (eds.): Conflicting agents. Conflict management in multiagent systems. Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations (MASA), vol. 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Verhagen, H.: Norm Autonomous Agents. PhD thesis, Department of System and Computer Sciences, The Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weiß, G., Rovatsos, M., Nickles, M., Meinl, C.: Capturing agent autonomy in roles and XML. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 105–112 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weiß, G., Fischer, F., Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M. (2006). Operational Modelling of Agent Autonomy: Theoretical Aspects and a Formal Language. In: Müller, J.P., Zambonelli, F. (eds) Agent-Oriented Software Engineering VI. AOSE 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3950. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11752660_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11752660_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34097-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34099-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics