Skip to main content

Project Web and Electronic Process Guide as Software Process Improvement

  • Conference paper
Software Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3792))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Software companies have to identify and manage numerous linked processes to function effectively. We describe how a medium-sized software company improved their software development methodology through implementing an electronic process guide. We discuss how involvement in creating an electronic process guide through process workshops influences the use of the guide over time. We have found that the workshop participators were more positive, and had a higher degree of use. Processes developed by the stakeholders themselves seem to be a perfect starting point when introducing a process guide. An evolutionary introduction of the guide created a high and continuous focus on software process improvement in the whole organization. We also found that integrating the existing administrative systems and tools supporting project work with the process guide increased its usefulness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kellner, M.I., et al.: Process Guides: Effective Guidance for Process Participants. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Software Process: Computer Supported Organizational Work, Lisle, Illinois, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conradi, R., Dybå, T.: An Empirical Study on the Attitudes to Formal Routines to Transfer Knowledge and Experience. In: Proceedings of the Norwegian Computer Science Conference (NIK), Tromsø, Norway (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2), 186–204 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dybå, T., Moe, N.B., Mikkelsen, E.M.: An Empirical Investigation on Factors Affecting Software Developer Acceptance and Utilization of Electronic Process Guides. In: Proceedings of the International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS), Chicago, Illinois, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dingsøyr, T., et al.: A workshop-oriented approach for defining electronic process guides - A case study. In: Acuña, S.T., Juristo, N. (eds.) Software Process Modelling, pp. 187–205. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dingsøyr, T., Moe, N.B.: The Process Workshop - A Tool to Define Electronic Process Guides in Small Companies. In: Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC), Melbourne, Australia. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. ESA. ESA software engineering standard. European Space Agency (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Villmones, N.J.: Project manager’s guide to the Galaxy - The ultimate tool for running software development projects? In: Dingsøyr, T. (ed.) EuroSPI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3281. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moe, N.B., Dingsøyr, T.: The Impact of Process Workshop Involvement on the Use of an Electronic Process Guide: A Case Study. In: EuroMicro 2005, Porto, Portugal (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. ISO, ISO 9001:2000 Quality management systems – Requirements. ISO, Editor (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nilsen, K.R.: Process improvement through development of an extended electronic process guide - from electronic process guide to integrated work tool. In: Dingsøyr, T. (ed.) EuroSPI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3281. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Avison, D., et al.: Action research. Communications of the ACM 42(1), 94–97 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Davison, R., Martinsons, M.G., Kock, N.: Principles of canonical action research. Information Systems Journal 14(1), 65–86 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Susman, G., Evered, R.: An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly 23(4), 582–603 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moe, N.B., et al.: Process Guides as Software Process Improvement in a Small Company. In: Proceedings of the European Software Process Improvement Conference (EuroSPI), Nürnberg, Germany (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moe, N.B., Dybå, R.C.T.: The Adoption of an Electronic Process Guide in a Company with Voluntary Use. In: Dingsøyr, T. (ed.) EuroSPI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3281, pp. 114–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moe, N.B., Dingsøyr, T., Nilsen, K.R., Villmones, N.J. (2005). Project Web and Electronic Process Guide as Software Process Improvement. In: Richardson, I., Abrahamsson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds) Software Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3792. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11586012_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11586012_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30286-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32271-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics