Abstract
Priorities are often used to resolve conflicts in timed systems. However, priorities are not directly supported by state-of-art model checkers. Often, a designer has to either abstract the priorities leading to a high degree of non-determinism or model the priorities using existing primitives. In this work, it is shown how prioritized timed automata can make modelling prioritized timed systems easier through the support for priority specification and model checking. The verification of prioritized timed automata requires a subtraction operation to be performed on two clock zones, represented by DBMs, for which we propose an algorithm to generate the minimal number of zones partitioned. After the application of a series of DBM subtraction operations, the number of zones generated become large. We thus propose an algorithm to reduce the final number of zones partitioned by merging some of them. A typical bus arbitration example is used to illustrate the benefits of the proposed algorithms. Due to the support for prioritization and zone reduction, we observe that there is a 50% reduction in the number of modes and 44% reduction in the number of transitions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Altisen, K., Gössler, G., Sifakis, J.: A methodology for the construction of scheduled systems. In: Joseph, M. (ed.) FTRTFT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1926, pp. 106–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Altisen, K., Gössler, G., Sifakis, J.: Scheduler modeling based on the controller synthesis paradigm. Real-Time Systems 23, 55–84 (2002)
Alur, R., Courcoubetis, C., Dill, D.L.: Model-checking for real-time systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 414–425. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1990)
Alur, R., Dill, D.L.: A theory of timed automata. Theoretical Computer Science 126(2), 183–235 (1994)
Baeten, J.C.M., Bergstra, J.A., Klop, J.W.: Syntax and defining equations for an interrupt mechanism in process algebra. Technical Report CS-R8503, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1985)
Bengtsson, J., Larsen, K., Larsson, F., Pettersson, P., Wang, Y.: UPPAAL: a tool suite for automatic verification of real-time systems. In: Alur, R., Sontag, E.D., Henzinger, T.A. (eds.) HS 1995. LNCS, vol. 1066, pp. 232–243. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Bryant, R.E.: Graph-based algorithms for Boolean function manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-35(8), 677–691 (1986)
Camilleri, J.: Introducing a priority operators to ccs. Technical Report 157, Cambridge (1989)
Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A.: Design and sythesis of synchronization skeletons using branching time temporal logic. In: Kozen, D. (ed.) Logic of Programs 1981. LNCS, vol. 131, pp. 52–71. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)
Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)
Cleaveland, R., Hennessy, M.: Priorities in process algebra. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Edinburgh (1988)
Dill, D.L.: Dill. Timing assumptions and verification of finite-state concurrent systems. In: Sifakis, J. (ed.) CAV 1989. LNCS, vol. 407, pp. 197–212. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)
Gössler, G., Sifakis, J.: Priority systems. In: de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M., Graf, S., de Roever, W.-P. (eds.) FMCO 2003. LNCS, vol. 3188, pp. 314–329. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Hsiung, P.-A., Lin, S.-W.: Model checking timed systems with priorities. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA, Hong-Kong, China), August 2005. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)
Hsiung, P.-A., Wang, F.: A state-graph manipulator tool for real-time system specification and verification. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA) (October 1998)
Lowe, G.: Probabilities and Priorities in Timed CSP. PhD thesis, St. Hugh’s College, University of Oxford, Hilary Term (1993)
Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs (1989)
Queille, J.-P., Sifakis, J.: Specification and verification of concurrent systems in CESAR. In: Dezani-Ciancaglini, M., Montanari, U. (eds.) Programming 1982. LNCS, vol. 137, pp. 337–351. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)
Sifakis, J.: The compositional specification of timed systems. In: Halbwachs, N., Peled, D.A. (eds.) CAV 1999. LNCS, vol. 1633, pp. 2–7. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Sifakis, J.: Modeling real-time systems — challenges and work directions. In: Henzinger, T.A., Kirsch, C.M. (eds.) EMSOFT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2211, pp. 373–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Wang, F.: RED: Model-checker for timed automata with clock-restriction diagram. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Real-Time Tools (August 2001); Technical Report 2001-014, ISSN 1404-3203, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University
Wang, F., Hsiung, P.-A.: Efficient and user-friendly verification. IEEE Transactions on Computers 51(1), 61–83 (2002)
Yovine, S.: Kronos: A verification tool for real-time systems. International Journal of Software Tools for Technology Transfer 1(1/2), 123–133 (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lin, SW., Hsiung, PA., Huang, CH., Chen, YR. (2005). Model Checking Prioritized Timed Automata. In: Peled, D.A., Tsay, YK. (eds) Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis. ATVA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3707. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11562948_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11562948_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29209-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31969-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)