Skip to main content

Component-Based Software Engineering

The Need to Link Methods and Their Theories

  • Conference paper
Theoretical Aspects of Computing – ICTAC 2005 (ICTAC 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3722))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We discuss some of the difficulties and significant issues that we need to consider when developing a formal method for component-based software engineering. We argue that to deal with the challenges, there is a need in research to link existing theories and methods of programming for effective support to component-based software engineering. We then present our initiative on a unified multi-view approach to modelling, design and analysis of component systems, emphasising the integration of models for different views.

Partly supported as a research task of E-Macao Project funded by the Macao Government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, R.: A Formal Approach to Software Architecture. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon, School of Computer Science (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, R.: A formal basis for architectural connection. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 6(3), 213–249 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arbab, F.: Reo: A channeled based coordination model for components composition. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 14(3), 329–366 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beneken, G., Hammerschall, U., et al.: Componentware - sate of the art 2003. In: Background Paper for Understanding Components Workshop of the CUE Initiative (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Broy, M.: Multi-view modeling of software systems. In: Liu, Z., He, J. (eds.) Mathematical Frameworks for Component Software: Models for Analysis and Synthesis. World Scientific, Singapore (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Broy, M., Stølen, K.: Specification and Development of Interactive Systems: FOCUS on Streams, Interfaces, and Refinement. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaudron, M.R.V., de Jong, E.: Components are from Mars. In: Rolim, J.D.P. (ed.) IPDPS-WS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1800, pp. 727–733. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dijkstra, E.W.: A Discipline of Programming. Prentice Hall, INC., Englewood Cliffs (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Souza, D., Wills, A.C.: Objects, Components and Framework with UML: The Catalysis Approach. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ehrig, H., Damm, W., Desel, J., Große-Rhode, M., Reif, W., Schnieder, E., Westkämper, E. (eds.): INT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3147. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Garlan, D., Monroe, R.T., Wile, D.: Acme: Architectural description of component-based systems. In: Leavens, G.T., Sitaraman, M. (eds.) Foundations of Component-Based Systems, pp. 47–68. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gössler, G., Sifakis, J.: Composition for component-based modeling. Science of Computer Programming 55(1-3) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. He, J., Liu, Z., Li, X.: rCOS: A refinement calculus for object systems. Technical Report UNU-IIST Report No 322, UNU-IIST, P.O. Box 3058, Macau (March 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. He, J., Liu, Z., Li, X.: A theory of contracts. Technical Report UNU-IIST Report No 327, UNU-IIST, P.O. Box 3058, Macau (July 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. He, J., Liu, Z., Li, X., Qin, S.: A relational model of object oriented programs. In: Chin, W.-N. (ed.) APLAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3302, pp. 415–436. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Henzinger, T., Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: Temporal proof methodologies for real-time systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Annual Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, U.S.A., pp. 269–276. ACM Press, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoare, C.A.R., He, J.: Unifying theories of programming. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hoare, T.: The verifying compiler: A grand challenge for computer research. Journal of the ACM 50(1), 63–69 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Holmegaard, J.P., Knudsen, J., Makowski, P., Ravn, A.P.: Formalization in component based development. In: Liu, Z., He, J. (eds.) Mathematical Frameworks for Component Software: Models for Analysis and Synthesis. World Scientific, Singapore (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hybertson, D.: A uniform component modeling space. Informatica 25, 475–482 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lamport, L.: Specifying Systems: The TLA+ Language and Tools for Hardware and Software Engineers. Pearson Education, Inc., London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, Z., He, J., Li, X.: Contract-oriented development of component software. In: Proc. 3rd IFIP International Conference on Theoretical Computer Science

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, Z., He, J., Li, X.: rCOS: Refinement of component and object systems. In: de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M., Graf, S., de Roever, W.-P. (eds.) FMCO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3657, pp. 183–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, Z., Joseph, M.: Specification and verification of fault-tolerance, timing and scheduling. ACM Transactions on Languages and Systems 21(1), 46–89 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Luckham, D.C., Vera, J.: An event-based architecture definition language. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 21(9), 717–734 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Magee, J., Dulay, N., Eisenbach, S., Kramer, J.: Specifying distributed software architectures. In: Botella, P., Schäfer, W. (eds.) ESEC 1995. LNCS, vol. 989, pp. 137–153. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems: Specification. Springer, New York (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26(1), 70–93 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pnueli, A.: Looking ahead. In: Workshop on The Verification Grand Challenge, February 21–23. SRI International, Menlo Park (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pooley, R., Steven, P.: Using UML: Software Engineering with Objects and Component. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rentsch, T.: Object-oriented programming. SIGPLAN Notices 17(2), 51 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Roshandel, R., Schmerl, B., Medvidovic, N., Garlan, D., Zhang, D.: Understanding tradeoffs among different architectural modeling approaches. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schneider, J.-G., Nierstrasz, O.: Components, scripts and glue. In: Barroca, L., Hall, J., Hall, P. (eds.) Software Architectures - Advances and Applications, pp. 13–25. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Selic, B., Gullekson, G., Ward, P.T.: Real-Time object-oriented modeling. Wiley, Chichester (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Shaw, M., Garlan, D.: Software Architectures: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering, 6th edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Szyperski, C.: Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Taylor, R.N., Medvidovic, N., Anderson, K.M., Whitehead Jr., E.J., Robbins, J.E., Nies, K.A., Oreizy, P., Dubrow, D.L.: A component- and message-based architectural style for gui software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 22(6), 390–406 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. van de Hoek, A., Rakic, M., Roshandel, R., Medvidovic, N.: Taming architecture evolution. In: Proceedings of the 6th European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC) and the 9th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, FSE-9 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wirsing, M., Broy, M.: Algebraic state machines. In: Rus, T. (ed.) AMAST 2000. LNCS, vol. 1816, pp. 89–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jifeng, H., Li, X., Liu, Z. (2005). Component-Based Software Engineering. In: Van Hung, D., Wirsing, M. (eds) Theoretical Aspects of Computing – ICTAC 2005. ICTAC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3722. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11560647_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11560647_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29107-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32072-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics