Skip to main content

Games Where You Can Play Optimally Without Any Memory

  • Conference paper
CONCUR 2005 – Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3653))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Reactive systems are often modelled as two person antagonistic games where one player represents the system while his adversary represents the environment. Undoubtedly, the most popular games in this context are parity games and their cousins (Rabin, Streett and Muller games). Recently however also games with other types of payments, like discounted or mean-payoff [5,6], previously used only in economic context, entered into the area of system modelling and verification. The most outstanding property of parity, mean-payoff and discounted games is the existence of optimal positional (memoryless) strategies for both players. This observation raises two questions: (1) can we characterise the family of payoff mappings for which there always exist optimal positional strategies for both players and (2) are there other payoff mappings with practical or theoretical interest and admitting optimal positional strategies. This paper provides a complete answer to the first question by presenting a simple necessary and sufficient condition on payoff mapping guaranteeing the existence of optimal positional strategies. As a corollary to this result we show the following remarkable property of payoff mappings: if both players have optimal positional strategies when playing solitary one-player games then also they have optimal positional strategies for two-player games.

This research was supported by European Research Training Network: Games and Automata for Synthesis and Validation and ACI Sécurité Informatique 2003-22 VERSYDIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bouquet, A., Serre, O., Walukiewicz, I.: Pushdown games with unboundedness and regular conditions. In: Pandya, P.K., Radhakrishnan, J. (eds.) FSTTCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2914, pp. 88–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Cachat, T., Duparc, J., Thomas, W.: Solving pushdown games with a Σ3 winning condition. In: Bradfield, J.C. (ed.) CSL 2002 and EACSL 2002. LNCS, vol. 2471, pp. 322–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A., Jurdziński, M.: Mean-payoff parity games. In: LICS (2005) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colcombet, T.; Niwińki, D.: On the positional determinacy of edge-labeled games (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Alfaro, L., Faella, M., Henzinger, T.A., Majumdar, R., Stoelinga, M.: Model checking discounted temporal properties. In: Jensen, K., Podelski, A. (eds.) TACAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2988, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. de Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T.A., Majumdar, R.: Discounting the future in systems theory. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 1022–1037. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrenfeucht, A., Mycielski, J.: Positional strategies for mean payoff games. Intern. J. of Game Theory 8, 109–113 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Emerson, E.A., Jutla, C.: Tree automata, μ-calculus and determinacy. In: FOCS 1991, pp. 368–377. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gimbert, H.: Parity and exploration games on infinite graphs. In: Marcinkowski, J., Tarlecki, A. (eds.) CSL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3210, pp. 56–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gimbert, H., Zielonka, W.: When can you play positionally? In: Fiala, J., Koubek, V., Kratochvíl, J. (eds.) MFCS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3153, pp. 686–697. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Grädel, E.: Positional determinacy of infinite games. In: Diekert, V., Habib, M. (eds.) STACS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2996, pp. 4–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Mostowski, A.W.: Games with forbidden positions. Technical Report 78, Uniwersytet Gdański, Instytut Matematyki (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shapley, L.S.: Stochastic games. Proceedings Nat. Acad. of Science USA 39, 1095–1100 (1953)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gimbert, H., Zielonka, W. (2005). Games Where You Can Play Optimally Without Any Memory. In: Abadi, M., de Alfaro, L. (eds) CONCUR 2005 – Concurrency Theory. CONCUR 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3653. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11539452_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11539452_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28309-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31934-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics