Skip to main content

On the Complexity of Hybrid Logics with Binders

  • Conference paper
Computer Science Logic (CSL 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3634))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Hybrid logic refers to a group of logics lying between modal and first-order logic in which one can refer to individual states of the Kripke structure. In particular, the hybrid logic HL(@, ↓ ) is an appealing extension of modal logic that allows one to refer to a state by means of the given names and to dynamically create new names for a state.

Unfortunately, as for the richer first-order logic, satisfiability for the hybrid logic HL(@, ↓ ) is undecidable and model checking for HL(@, ↓ ) is PSpace-complete. We carefully analyze these results and we isolate large fragments of HL(@, ↓ ) for which satisfiability is decidable and model checking is below PSpace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andréka, H., van Benthem, J., Németi, I.: Modal logics and bounded fragments of predicate logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27, 217–274 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Grädel, E.: On the restraining power of guards. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64, 1719–1742 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Mortimer, M.: On languages with two variables. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 21, 135–140 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Grädel, E., Otto, M.: On logics with two variables. Theoretical computer science 224, 73–113 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Areces, C., Blackburn, P., Marx, M.: Hybrid logics: Characterization, interpolation, and complexity. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66, 977–1010 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. ten Cate, B.: Interpolation for extended modal languages. Journal of Symbolic Logic 70, 223–234 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. ten Cate, B.: Model theory for extended modal languages. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, ILLC Dissertation Series DS-2005-01 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Franceschet, M., de Rijke, M.: Model checking for hybrid logics (with an application to semistructured data). Journal of Applied Logics (2005) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blackburn, P., Seligman, J.: Hybrid languages. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4, 251–272 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Harel, D.: Recurring dominoes: making the highly undecidable highly understandable. Annals of Discrete Mathematics 24, 51–72 (1985)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Goranko, V.: Hierarchies of modal and temporal logics with reference pointers. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 5, 1–24 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Areces, C., Blackburn, P., Marx, M.: A road-map on complexity for hybrid logics. In: Flum, J., Guez-Artalejo, M.R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the EACSL, Madrid (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marx, M.: Narcissists, stepmothers and spies. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher, M., Ladner, R.: Propositional dynamic logic of regular programs. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 18, 194–211 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Areces, C., Blackburn, P., Marx, M.: The computational complexity of hybrid temporal logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL 8, 653–679 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. ten Cate, B., Franceschet, M.: Guarded fragments with constants. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information (2005) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Börger, E., Grädel, E., Gurevich, Y.: The Classical Decision Problem. Springer, Berlin (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. ten Cate, B., Franceschet, M.: On the complexity of hybrid logics with binders. Technical Report PP-2005-02, ILLC, University of Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vardi, M.Y.: On the complexity of bounded-variable queries. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pp. 266–276 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ten Cate, B., Franceschet, M.: Guarded fragments with constants. Technical Report PP-2004-32, ILLC, University of Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Blackburn, P.: Representation, reasoning, and relational structures: A hybrid logic manifesto. Logic Journal of the IGPL 8, 339–365 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

ten Cate, B., Franceschet, M. (2005). On the Complexity of Hybrid Logics with Binders. In: Ong, L. (eds) Computer Science Logic. CSL 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3634. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11538363_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11538363_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28231-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31897-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics