Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strategies to Parallelize ILP Systems

  • Conference paper
Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3625))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It is well known by Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) practioners that ILP systems usually take a long time to find valuable models (theories). The problem is specially critical for large datasets, preventing ILP systems to scale up to larger applications. One approach to reduce the execution time has been the parallelization of ILP systems. In this paper we overview the state-of-the-art on parallel ILP implementations and present work on the evaluation of some major parallelization strategies for ILP. Conclusions about the applicability of each strategy are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Srinivasan, A., Muggleton, S., King, R.D., Sternberg, M.J.E.: Mutagenesis: Ilp experiments in a non-determinate biological domain. In: Wrobel, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming. GMD-Studien, vol. 237, pp. 217–232 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dolsak, B., Bratko, I., Jezernik, A.: Application of machine learning in finite element computation. In: Machine Learning, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery: Methods and Applications. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Muggleton, S., King, R.D., Sternberg, M.J.E.: Predicting protein secondary structure using inductive logic programming. Protein Engineering 5, 647–657 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Srinivasan, A., King, R.D., Muggleton, S., Sternberg, M.J.E.: Carcinogenesis predictions using ILP. In: Džeroski, S., Lavrač, N. (eds.) ILP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1297, pp. 273–287. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tang, L.R., Mooney, R.J., Melville, P.: Scaling up ilp to large examples: Results on link discovery for counter-terrorism. In: Proceedings of the KDD 2003 Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining (MRDM 2003), pp. 107–121 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Železný, F., Srinivasan, A., Page, D.: Lattice-search runtime distributions may be heavy-tailed. In: Matwin, S., Sammut, C. (eds.) ILP 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2583, pp. 333–345. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Srinivasan, A.: A study of two probabilistic methods for searching large spaces with ilp. Technical Report PRG-TR-16-00, Oxford University Computing Laboratory (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Camacho, R.: Improving the efficiency of ilp systems using an incremental language level search. In: Annual Machine Learning Conference of Belgium and the Netherlands (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Srinivasan, A., King, R.D., Bain, M.E.: An empirical study of the use of relevance information in inductive logic programming. JMLR (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fonseca, N., Costa, V.S., Camacho, R., Silva, F.: On avoiding redundancy in Inductive Logic Programming. In: Camacho, R., King, R., Srinivasan, A. (eds.) ILP 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3194, pp. 132–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Blockeel, H., Dehaspe, L., Demoen, B., Janssens, G., Ramon, J., Vandecasteele, H.: Improving the efficiency of Inductive Logic Programming through the use of query packs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 16, 135–166 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Costa, V.S., Srinivasan, A., Camacho, R., Blockeel, H., Van Laer, W.: Query transformations for improving the efficiency of ilp systems. JMLR (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Raedt, L.: A perspective on inductive logic programming. In: The logic programming paradigm - a 25 year perspective, pp. 335–346. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Page, D.: ILP: Just do it. In: Cussens, J., Frisch, A.M. (eds.) ILP 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1866, pp. 3–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Page, D., Srinivasan, A.: Ilp: a short look back and a longer look forward. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 4, 415–430 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grama, A., Gupta, A., Karypis, G., Kumar, V.: Introduction to Parallel Computing, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fürnkranz, J.: Separate-and-conquer rule learning. Artificial Intelligence Review 13(1), 3–54 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Muggleton, S.: Inverse entailment and Progol. New Generation Computing, Special issue on Inductive Logic Programming 13(3-4), 245–286 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Quinlan, J.R., Cameron-Jones, R.M.: FOIL: A midterm report. In: Brazdil, P.B. (ed.) ECML 1993. LNCS, vol. 667, pp. 3–20. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Srinivasan, A.: Aleph manual (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ohwada, H., Mizoguchi, F.: Parallel execution for speeding up inductive logic programming systems. In: Arikawa, S., Furukawa, K. (eds.) DS 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1721, pp. 277–286. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsui, T., Inuzuka, N., Seki, H., Itoh, H.: Comparison of three parallel implementations of an induction algorithm. In: 8th Int. Parallel Computing Workshop, Singapore, pp. 181–188 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ohwada, H., Nishiyama, H., Mizoguchi, F.: Concurrent execution of optimal hypothesis search for inverse entailment. In: Cussens, J., Frisch, A.M. (eds.) ILP 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1866, pp. 165–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Wielemaker, J.: Native preemptive threads in swi-prolog. In: ICLP, pp. 331–345 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, Y., Skillicorn, D.: Parallel inductive logic for data mining. In: Workshop on Distributed and Parallel Knowledge Discovery, KDD 2000, Boston. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Graham, J., Page, C.D., Kamal, A.: Accelerating the drug design process through parallel inductive logic programming data mining. In: Proceeding of the Computational Systems Bioinformatics (CSB 2003). IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dehaspe, L., De Raedt, L.: Parallel inductive logic programming. In: Proceedings of the MLnet Familiarization Workshop on Statistics, Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Michalski, R.S.: Pattern recognition as rule-guided inductive inference. In: Proceedings of IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, pp. 349–361 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smith, R.G.: The contract net protocol: High-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Trans. Computers 29(12), 1104–1113 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Muggleton, S., Firth, J.: Relational rule induction with cprogol4.4: A tutorial introduction. In: Dzeroski, S., Lavrac, N. (eds.) Relational Data Mining, pp. 160–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pvm:parallel virtual machine, http://www.csm.ornl.gov/pvm/

  32. Konstantopoulos, S.K.: A data-parallel version of aleph. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Computing for Machine Learning, co-located with ECML/PKDD 2003, Dubrovnik, Croatia (September 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gropp, W., Lusk, E., Doss, N., Skjellum, A.: A high-performance, portable implementation of the MPI message passing interface standard. Parallel Computing 22(6), 789–828 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Message Passing Interface Forum. MPI: A message-passing interface standard. Technical Report UT-CS-94-230 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Clare, A., King, R.D.: Data mining the yeast genome in a lazy functional language. In: Dahl, V., Wadler, P. (eds.) PADL 2003. LNCS, vol. 2562, pp. 19–36. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Fonseca, N., Silva, F., Camacho, R., Costa, V.S.: Induction with April - A preliminary report. Technical Report DCC-2003-02, DCC-FC & LIACC, Universidade do Porto (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Squyres, J.M., Lumsdaine, A.: A Component Architecture for LAM/MPI. In: Dongarra, J., Laforenza, D., Orlando, S. (eds.) EuroPVM/MPI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2840, pp. 379–387. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Prati, R.C., Flach, P.: Roccer: an algorithm for rule learning based on roc analysis. In: Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Muggleton, S., Feng, C.: Efficient induction in logic programs. In: Muggleton, S. (ed.) Inductive Logic Programming, pp. 281–298. Academic Press, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DCC-FC & LIACC, Universidade do Porto, R. do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180, Porto, Portugal

    Nuno A. Fonseca & Fernando Silva

  2. Faculdade de Engenharia & LIACC, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal

    Rui Camacho

Authors
  1. Nuno A. Fonseca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fernando Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rui Camacho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Informatik I12, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstr. 3, D-85748, Garching b. München, Germany

    Stefan Kramer

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Bernhard Pfahringer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fonseca, N.A., Silva, F., Camacho, R. (2005). Strategies to Parallelize ILP Systems. In: Kramer, S., Pfahringer, B. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3625. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11536314_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11536314_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28177-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31851-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation