Skip to main content

Deterministic and Stochastic Quantum Annealing Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantum Annealing and Other Optimization Methods

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 679))

Abstract

The idea of quantum annealing (QA) is a late offspring of the celebrated simulated thermal annealing by Kirkpatrick et al. [1]. In simulated annealing, the problem of minimizing a certain cost (or energy) function in a large configuration space is tackled by the introduction of a fictitious temperature, which is slowly lowered in the course of a Monte Carlo or Molecular Dynamics simulation [1]. This device allows an exploration of the configuration space of the problem at hand, effectively avoiding trapping at unfavorable local minima through thermal hopping above energy barriers. It makes for a very robust and effective minimization tool, often much more effective than standard, gradient-based, minimization methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Kirkpatrick, C.D. Gelatt, Jr., M.P. Vecchi, Science 220, 671 (1983);

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. A.B. Finnila, M.A. Gomez, C. Sebenik, C. Stenson, J.D. Doll, Chem. Phys. Lett. 219, 343 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Kadowaki, H. Nishimori: Phys. Rev. E 58, 5355 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Brooke, D. Bitko, T.F. Rosenbaum, G. Aeppli: Science 284, 779 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Santoro, R. Martoňák, E. Tosatti, R. Car: Science 295, 2427 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, J. Lapan, A. Lundgren, D. Preda: Science 292, 472 (2001).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Stella, G. E. Santoro, and E.Tosatti: to appear on Phys. Rev. B; preprint cond-mat/0502129

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y.H. Lee, B.J. Berne: J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 86 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y.H. Lee, B.J. Berne: J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 459 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Martoňák, G. Santoro, E. Tosatti: Phys. Rev. B 66, 94203 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Martoňák, G.E. Santoro, E. Tosatti: Phys. Rev. E 70, 057701 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Battaglia, G. Santoro, E. Tosatti: to appear on PRE; preprint cond-mat/0502468.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P.F. Stadler and W. Schnabl: Phys. Lett. A 161, 337 (1992).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Stella, G.E. Santoro, and E. Tosatti: in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  15. N.G. van Kampen: Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.A. Huse, D.S. Fisher: Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2203 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. L.D. Landau: Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 2, 46 (1932).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Zener: Proc. Royal Soc. A 137, 696 (1932).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Shinomoto and Y. Kabashima: J. Phys. A 24 L141 (1991); Y. Kabashima and S. Shinomoto: J. Phys. Soc. Japan 60 3993 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P.A. Lee and T.V. Ramakrishnan: Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 287 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Suzuki: Prog. Theor. Phys. 56, 1454 (1976).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. C.H. Papadimitriou: Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity (Dover, NY 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Nishimori: Statistical Physics of Spin Glasses and Information Processing (Oxford University Press, 2001).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Special Issue on NP-hardness and Phase transitions, ed. by O. Dubois, R. Monasson, B. Selman and R. Zecchina, Theor. Comp. Sci. 265, Issue: 1-2 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J.J. Hopfield and D.W. Tank: Science 233, 625 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Mézard, G. Parisi: Europhys. Lett. 2, 913 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. A.G. Percus, O.C. Martin: Jour. Stat. Phys. 94, 739-758 (1999).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. D.S. Dean, D. Lancaster, S.N. Majumdar: J. Stat. Mech. L01001 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Mézard, G. Parisi, R. Zecchina, Science 297, 812 (2002);

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Mezard, R. Zecchina: Phys. Rev. E 66, 56126 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. S. Mertens: Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4281- 4284 (1988).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Weigt, A.K. Hartmann: Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 6118 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. A. Braunstein, R. Mulet, A. Pagnani, M. Weigt, R. Zecchina: Phys. Rev. E 68, 036702 (2003)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. G. Parisi, M. Mézard, M.Virasoro: Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  35. C. H. Papadimitriou, K. Steiglitz: Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  36. M.R. Garey, D.S. Johnson: Computers and Intractability (Freeman, New York 1979).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. D. Mitchell, B. Selman, H. Levesque: Hard and Easy Distribution of SAT Problems. In: Proc. of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-Press, 1992), p. 459.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. Mezard, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, R. Zecchina: J. Stat. Phys 111, 505 (2003).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. F. Barahona: J. Phys. A 15, 3241 (1982).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. C. De Simone et al.: J. Stat. Phys. 80, 487 (1995).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. D.S. Johnson and L.A. McGeoch: In Local Search in Combinatorial Optimization, ed. E.H.L. Aarts and J.K. Lenstra (J. Wiley and Sons, London, 1997, pp. 215-310).

    Google Scholar 

  42. P. F. Stadler: Towards a Theory of Landscapes. In: Complex Systems and Binary Networks, ed. by R. Lopez-Pena, R. Capovilla, R. Garca-Pelayo, H. Waelbroeck, and F. Zertuche (Springer Verlag, Berlin, New York 1995), pp. 77-163.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See http://www.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/groups/comopt/software/TSPLIB95

    Google Scholar 

  44. See http://www.intellektik.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/SATLIB/

    Google Scholar 

  45. D. Battaglia, M. Kolář, R. Zecchina: Phys. Rev. E 70, 036107 (2004).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. A. Montanari, G. Parisi, and F. Ricci-Tersenghi: J. Phys. A 37, 2073 (2004).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Z. Michalewicz: Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs, 3rd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  48. J.R. Koza: Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection (MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1992).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. J.H. Holland: Proc. Int. Un. Physiol. Soc. 3, 330 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  50. J.H. Holland: Processing and Processors for schemata. In: Associative Information Processing (American Elsevier, New York 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  51. J.P. Bouchaud, V. Dupuis, J. Hammann, E. Vincent: Phys. Rev. B 65, 24439 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. A. Montanari and R. Zecchina: Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 178701 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. M. Takahashi and M. Imada: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 53, 3765 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. D. M. Ceperley: Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 275 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. J.W. Negele and H. Orland: Quantum Many-Particle Systems (Addison-Wesley, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  56. B. Selman, H. Kautz and B. Cohen: In: Proc. AAAI-94 (AAAI Press, Seattle WA 1994), pp. 337-343.

    Google Scholar 

  57. S. Seitz, P. Orponen: An efficient local search method for random 3-satisfiability. In: Proc. LICS'03 Workshop on Typical Case Complexity and Phase Transitions (Ottawa, Canada, 2003); Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics Vol. 16 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  58. S. Boettcher, A. Percus: Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5211 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. N. Trivedi and D. M. Ceperley: Phys. Rev. B 41, 4552 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. G. Santoro, S. Sorella, L. Guidoni, A. Parola, and E. Tosatti: Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3065 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. L. Onsager: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58, 1486 (1936).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. A. Braunstein, M. Mézard, R. Zecchina: Survey propagation: an algorithm for satisfiability. To appear in Random Structures and Algorithms; preprint cs.CC/0212002

    Google Scholar 

  63. D. Battaglia, A. Braunstein, J. Chavas, R. Zecchina: Source coding by efficient selection of ground states clusters, preprint cond-mat/0412652.

    Google Scholar 

  64. J.S. Yedidia, W.T. Freeman and Y. Weiss: Generalized Belief Propagation. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13 (MIT press 2001), pp. 689-695.

    Google Scholar 

  65. F. R. Kschischang, B. J. Frey, and H.-A. Loeliger: IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 47, 498 (2002).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Arnab Das Bikas K. Chakrabarti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Battaglia, D., Stella, L., Zagordi, O., E. Santoro, G., Tosatti, E. Deterministic and Stochastic Quantum Annealing Approaches. In: Das, A., K. Chakrabarti, B. (eds) Quantum Annealing and Other Optimization Methods. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 679. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11526216_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11526216_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27987-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31515-5

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics