Skip to main content

Acquisition of a Project-Specific Process

  • Conference paper
Product Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3547))

Abstract

Currently, proposed development processes are often considered too generic for operational use. This often leads to a misunderstanding of the project-specific processes and its refuse. One reason for non-appropriate project-specific processes is insufficient support for the tailoring of generic processes to project characteristics and context constraints. To tackle this problem, we propose a method for the acquisition of a project-specific process. This method uses a domain-specific process line for top-down process tailoring and supports bottom-up refinement of the defined generic process based on tracking process activities. The expected advantage of the method is tailoring efficiency gained by usage of a process line and higher process adherence gained by bottom-up adaptation of the process. The work described was conducted in the automotive domain. This article presents an overview of the so-called Emergent Process Acquisition method (EPAc) and sketches an initial validation study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dustdar, S., Hoffmann, T., van der Aalst, W.: Mining of ad-hoc business with TeamLog, Distributed Systems Group. Technical University of Vienna (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker-Kornstaedt, U., Hamann, D., Kempkens, R., Rösch, P., Verlage, M., Webby, R., Zettel, J.: The SPEARMINT Approach to Software Process Definition and Process Guidance. In: Workshop on Software Engineering over the Internet at ICSE 1998, Kyoto, Japan (April 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Graydon, A.: ISO/IEC DTR 15504-2 Part 2: A Reference Model for Processes and Process Capability (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. http://www.microtool.de/instep/en/prod_pm_edition.asp

  5. Humphrey, W.S.: Introduction in the TSP. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jaufman, O., Dold, A., Haeberlein, T., Schlumpberger, C., Stupperich, M.: Requirements for Flexible Software Development Processes within Large and Long Taking Projects, QUATIC, Porto (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jaufman, O., Potznewick, S.: Suitability of the State of the Art Methods for Interdisciplinary System Development in Automotive Industry, Interdisciplinary Software Engineering (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jaufman, O.: Process Line Framework for the Domain of Automotive System Development. In: SPICE 2005 Conference (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kleiner, N.: Verbesserungsstrategien für den Workflow-Designprozess, Dissertation, University of Ulm (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Droschel, W., Wiemers, H.: Das V-Modell 1997, Der Standard für die Entwicklung von IT-Systemen mit Anleitung für den Praxiseinsatz, Oldenbourg (German) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miers, D.: The Workware Evaluation Framework, ENIX Ltd. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Münch, J., Schmitz, M., Verlage, M.: Tailoring großer Prozessmodelle auf der Basis von MVP-L*, 4. Workshop der Fachgruppe 5.1.1 (GI): Vorgehensmodelle – Einführung, betrieblicher Einsatz, Werkzeug-Unterstützung und Migration“, Berlin (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reichert, M.: Dynamic Changes in Process Management Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ulm, Faculty of Computer Science (July 2000) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rombach, R.: Practical benefits of goal-oriented measurement. In: Fenton, N., Littlewood, B. (eds.) Software Reliability and Metrics. Elsevier Applied Science, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Riddle, W., Schneider, H.: Coping with Process Agility. In: Tutorial at 2002 Software Engineering Process Group Conference (SEPG 2002), Phoenix, Arizona (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M., Regnell, B., Wesslen, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jaufman, O., Münch, J. (2005). Acquisition of a Project-Specific Process. In: Bomarius, F., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds) Product Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3547. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11497455_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11497455_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26200-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31640-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics