Skip to main content

Genetically Modified Organisms in the United States: Implementation, Concerns, and Public Perception

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Green Gene Technology

Part of the book series: Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology ((ABE,volume 107))

Abstract

We examine the state of biotechnology with respect to genetically modified (GM) organisms in agriculture. Our focus is on the USA, where there has been significant progress and implementation but where, to date, the matter has drawn little attention. GM organisms are the result of lateral gene transfers, the transfer of genes from one species to another, or sometimes, from one kingdom to another. The introduction of foreign genes makes some people very uncomfortable, and a small group of activists have grave concerns about the technology. Attempts by activists to build concern in the general public have garnered little attention; however, the producers of GM organisms have responded to their concerns and established extensive testing programs to be applied to each candidate organism that is produced. In the meantime, GM varieties of corn, cotton, soybean and rapeseed have been put into agricultural production and are now extensively planted. These crops, and the other, newer GM crops, have produced no problems and have pioneered a silent agricultural revolution in the USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berg P, Singer MF (1995) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:9011

    Article  PubMed  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cornell University (2004) Genetically engineered organisms: public issues education project http://www.geo-pie.cornell.edu/gmo.html , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  3. Daniell H, Datta R, Varma S, Gray S, Lee S (1998) Nat Biotechnol 16:345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Monsanto (2005) Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO http://www.monsanto.com , last visited 19 Aug 2005

  5. Henry SA (2002) Agricultural biotechnology: informing the dialogue. Cornell University, Geneva, NY, http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/comm/gmo/PDF/GMO2002.pdf , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  6. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (1999) Genetically modified crops. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/gmcrops/introduction , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  7. Agbios (2005) Mon 810 Food safety assessment case study: Modification method. http://www.agbios.com/cstudies.php?book=ESA&ev=MON810&chapter=Modifcation , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  8. Metcalfe DD (2003) Environ Health Perspect 111:1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart CN, Richards HA, Halfhill MD (2000) Biotechniques 29:844

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hails RS (2000) Tree 15:14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Welterlen M (2003) Engineered bents: a concern? Grounds Maintenance, Feb 2003, http://groundsmag.com/mag/grounds_maintenance_engineered_bents_concern/ , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  12. Lee L (1996) Plant Sci 115:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smalla K, Borin S, Heuer H, Gebhard F, Elsas JD, Nielsen K (2000) Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes from transgenic plants to bacteria: are there new data to fuel the debate? In: Proceedings 6th international symposium on the biosafety of genetically modified organisms, July 2000, Saskatoon, Canada. University Extension Press, Saskatchewan, pp 146–154

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kronenberger CB, Hoffman RE, Lezotte DC, Marine WM (1996) Emerg Infect Dis 2:121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ochman H, Lawrence JG, Groisman EA (2000) Nature 405:299

    Article  PubMed  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen I, Dubnau D (2004) Nat Rev Microbiol 2:241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellborough K, Hanley Z (2001) Emerging plant biotechnologies: new ways to find needles in haystacks. Information Systems for Biotechnology, http://www.isb.vt.edu/news/2001/news01.Aug.html , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  18. Janick J (1999) Plant Biotechnol 16:27

    Google Scholar 

  19. Crawley MJ, Brown SL, Hails RS, Kohns DD, Rees M (2001) Nature 409:682

    Article  PubMed  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hartzier B, Owen M (2003) Status and concerns for glyphosate resistance. Integrated crop management. Iowa State University http://www.ipm.iastate.edu/ipm/icm/2003/3-17-2003/glyphosate.html , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  21. Culpepper SA, Grey TL, Vencill WK, Kichler JM, Webster TM, Brown SM, York AC, Davis JW, Hanna WW (2006) Weed Sci 54:620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME (1999) Nature 399:214

    Article  PubMed  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hellmich R, Siegfried BD, Sears MK, Stanley-Horn DE, Daniels MJ, Mattila HR, Spencer T, Bidne KG, Lewis LC (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11925

    Article  PubMed  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Minorsky PV (2001) Plant Physiol 127:709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Stanley-Horn DE, Oberhauser KS, Pleasants JM, Mattila HR, Siegfried BD, Dively GP (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11937

    Article  PubMed  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Marks LA, Kalaitzandonakes N (2003) Agbioforum 5:43

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bucchini L, Goldman L (2002) Environ Health Perspect 110:5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2001) Report to FDA investigation of human health effects associated with potential exposure to genetically modified corn: a report to the US Food and Drug Administration from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mellman Group (2003) The Pew initiative on food and biotechnology. Public sentiment about genetically modified food. http://pewagbiotech.org/research/gmfood/survey3-01.pdf , last visited at 11 Feb 2007

  30. US Food and Drug Administration (2000) Report on consumer focus groups on biotechnology. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/∼comm/biorpt.html , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  31. Hallman WK, Hebden WC, Cuite CL, Aquino HL, Lang JT (2004) Americans and GM food: knowledge, opinion, and interest in 2004, FPI publication number RR-1104-007. Food Policy Institute, Rutgers, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kolodinsky J, DeSisto TP, Narsana R (2002) Influences of question wording on levels of support for genetically modified organisms. Consumer Interests Annual, vol 48 http://www.consumerinterests.org/files/public/QuestionWording-02.pdf , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  33. Marra MC, Pardey PG, Alston JM (2003) AgBioForum 5:43

    Google Scholar 

  34. James C (2004) ISAAA Briefs 34-2005: Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2005. http://www.isaaa.org/Resources/Publications/briefs/isaaa_briefs.htm , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  35. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology (2004) Genetically modified crops in the United States. University of Richmond, VA, http://pewagbiotech.org/resources/factsheets/display.php3?FactsheetID=2 , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  36. Zitnak A, Johnston GR (1970) Am Potato J 47:256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Berkley SF, Hightower AW, Beier RC, Fleming DW, Brokopp CD, Ivie G, Broame CV (1986) Ann Intern Med 105:351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (2003) Public release summary on the evaluation of the new active Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki endo-toxins as produced by the Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab genes and their controlling sequences in the new product Bollgard II cotton event 15985. APVMA, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bennett D (2005) A look at Roundup Ready Flex cotton. Delta Farm Press, 24 Feb 2005, http://deltafarmpress.com/news/050224-roundup-flex/ , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  40. Golden Rice Project (2005). Biofortified rice. Golden Rice Humanitarian Board, http://www.goldenrice.org , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  41. Coghlan A (2005) New “golden rice” carries far more vitamin. New Scientist, 27 Mar 2005, http://www.newscientist.com/channel/health/dn7196–new-golden-rice-carries-far-more-vitamin.html , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  42. Potrykus I (2005) GMO-technology and malnutrition, public sector responsibility and failure. Electronic J Biotechnol 8(3) http://www.ejbiotechnology.info/content/vol8/issue3/editorial.html , last visited 11 Feb 2007

  43. Mertz ET, Bates LS, Nelson OE (1964) Science 145:279

    Article  PubMed  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lucas DM (2004) Monsanto petition for determination of non-regulated status for Lysine Maize LY038. Monsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri, http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/04_22901p.pdf last visited 11 Feb 2007

  45. Huang S, Kruger DE, Frizzi A, D'Ordine RL, Florida CA, Adams WR, Brown WE, Luethy MH (2005) Plant Biotechnol J 3:555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ames BN, Gold LS (1990) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:7782

    Article  PubMed  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max P. Oeschger .

Editor information

Armin Fiechter Christof Sautter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oeschger, M.P., Silva, C.E. (2007). Genetically Modified Organisms in the United States: Implementation, Concerns, and Public Perception. In: Fiechter, A., Sautter, C. (eds) Green Gene Technology. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol 107. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2007_051

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics