Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Electronic Health Records

  • Chapter
Information Technology Solutions for Healthcare

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

13 Bibliography

  1. Allaert F.A. and Dusserre L. Telemedicine: responsibilities and contractual framework. Medinfo 9. 1998; 1:261–4

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alvares R. Integrating Telehealth — Infoway perspective. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Telehealth; 2004 Oct 3–5; Quebec City, Canada. Available from: URL: http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/pdf/CST_TelehealthV8_E.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson J.G. Evaluating clinical information systems: a step towards reducing medical errors. MD Computing. May 2000–Jun 2000; 17(3):21–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Australian Department of Health and Ageing. HealthConnect — an overview; 2004. Available from: URL: http://www7.health.gov.au/healthconnect/pdf/HealthConnect_overview_May2004.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ball M.J. and Lillis J. E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2001; 61:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnett G.O. and Shortliffe E.H. Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care. Addison Wesley. 1990

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bates D.W., Cohen M., Leape L.L., Overhage J.M., Shabot M.M., and Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. Jul 2001–Aug 2001; 8(4):299–308

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beale T. The GEHR software architecture for a reliable EHR. Toward an Electronic Health Record Europe’ 99. Nov 1999; 328–39

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berg M. Medical work and the computer-based patient record: a sociological perspective. Methods of Information in Medicine. Sep 1998; 37(3):294–301

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brennan P.F. Health informatics and community health: support for patients as collaborators in care. Methods of Information in Medicine. Dec 1999; 38(4–5):274–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burns F. NHS Executive. Information For Health-An Information Strategy For The Modern NHS 1998–2005. HMSO Ltd, London; Sep 1998; ISBN: 0 95327190 2

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carl F. and Gribble T.J. HealthDesk for Haemophilia: an interactice computer and communications system for chronic illness self-management. Medinfo 8. 1995; 829–33

    Google Scholar 

  13. cited by Douglas J.V. Health Data Online. MD Computing. Jan 2001–Feb 2001; 18(1):9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clinton W. State of the Union Address; Feb 1997

    Google Scholar 

  15. Department of Health (UK). Delivering 21st Century IT Support for the NHS-National Strategic Programme. The Stationery Office; 2002

    Google Scholar 

  16. Department of Health (UK). The NHS Improvement Plan-Putting people at the heart of public services. The Stationery Office; 2004

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dick R.S., Steen E.B., and Detmer D.E. The Computer-Based Patient Record, an Essential Technology for Healthcare. National Academy Press, Washington DC; 1991

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dixon R., Grubb P.A., Lloyd D., and Kalra D. Consolidated List of Requirements. EHCR Support Action Deliverable 1.4. European Commission DGXIII, Brussels; May 2001. 59pp. Available from http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/HealthI/EHCR-SupA/del1-4v1_3.PDF

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dolin R.H. Outcome analysis: considerations for an electronic health record. MD Computing. Jan 1997–Feb 1997; 14(1):50–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dolin R.H., Alschuler L., Beebe C., Biron P.V., Boyer S.L., Essin D., Kimber E., Lincoln T., and Mattison J.E. The HL7 Clinical Document Architecture. J Am Med Inform Assoc. Nov 2001–Dec 2001; 8(6):552–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. EHR fanfare masks complicated IM&T spending plan. Br J Healthcare Comput Inf Manage. 2001; 18(2):4

    Google Scholar 

  22. Good Medical Practice. Third edition. General Medical Council (UK), London; May 2001. http://www.gmc-uk.org/standards

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grimson J., Grimson W., Berry D., Stephens G., Felton E., Kalra D., Toussaint P., and Weier O.W. A CORBA-based integration of distributed electronic healthcare records using the synapses approach. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. Sep 1998; 2(3):124–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Harnessing information technology to improve health care. United States Department of Health and Human Services. 6 May 2004. Available from http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2004pres/20040427a.html Last accessed 4 November 2004

    Google Scholar 

  25. Haughton J. A paradigm shift in healthcare. From disease management to patient-centered systems. MD Computing. Jul 2000–Aug 2000; 17(4):34–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Health Online: a health information action plan for Australia. The National Health Information Management Advisory Council, Commonwealth of Australia; 1999

    Google Scholar 

  27. Heard S., Doyle L., Southgate L., and others. The GEHR Requirements for Ethical and Legal Acceptability. European Commission, Brussels; 1993; The Good European Health Record Project: Deliverable 8. 9 chapters, 68 pages

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heard S., Grivel A., Schloeffel P., and Doust J. The benefits and difficulties of introducing a national approach to electronic health records in Australia in: National Electronic Health Records Taskforce. A Health Information Network for Australia. Department of Health and Aged Care, Commonwealth of Australia; Jul 2000

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hopkins R. and others, Editors, Project Team 1-028. ENV 13606: EHCR Communications: Part 3 Distribution Rules. CEN TC/251, Stockholm; 1999

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hurlen P., Editor, Project Team 1-011. ENV 12265: Electronic Healthcare Record Architecture. CEN TC/251, Brussels; 1995

    Google Scholar 

  31. Iakovidis I. From electronic medical record to personal health records: present situation and trends in European Union in the area of electronic healthcare records. Medinfo 9. 1998; 1Suppl:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  32. Iakovidis I. Towards personal health record: current situation, obstacles and trends in implementation of electronic healthcare record in Europe. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 1998; 52(1–3):105–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ingram D., Hap B., Lloyd D., Grubb P., and others. The GEHR Requirements for Portability. European Commission, Brussels; 1992; The Good European Health Record Project: Deliverable 5

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ingram D., Lloyd D., Baille O., Grubb P., and others. The GEHR Requirements for Communication Capacity. European Commission, Brussels; 1992; The Good European Health Record Project: Deliverable 6

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ingram D., Murphy J., Griffith S., Machado H., and others. GEHR Educational Requirements. European Commission, Brussels; 1993; The Good European Health Record Project: Deliverable 9

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ingram D., Southgate L., Kalra D., Griffith S., Heard S., and others. The GEHR Requirements for Clinical Comprehensiveness. European Commission, Brussels; 1992; The Good European Health Record Project: Deliverable 4. (19 chapters, 144 pages)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Institute of Medicine (US). To Err is Human. Washington: The Institute; 2000

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jones R., Pearson J., McGregor S., Cawsey A.J., Barrett A., Craig N., Atkinson J.M., Gilmour W.H., and McEwen J. Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients. BMJ. Nov 1999; 319(7219):1241–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kalra D., Ingram D., Austin A., Griffith V., Lloyd D., Patterson D., Kirstein P., Conversin P., and Fritsche W. Demonstrating wireless IPv6 access to a Federated Health Record Server. In Bubak, M.; van Albada, G. D.; Sloot, P. M. A.; Dongarra, J. J. (eds) Computational Science — ICCS 2004 4th International Conference Krakow, Poland, June 6–9, 2004 Proceedings, Part IV. pp1165–1171. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. ISSN: 0302-9743

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kalra D., Singleton P., Ingram D., Milan J., MacKay J., Detmer D., and Rector A. Security and confidentiality approach for the Clinical E-Science Framework (CLEF). Proc Health Grid 2004, Clermont-Feraud. European Commission. Available from http://clermont2004.healthgrid.org/ Last accessed 6 September 2004

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kalra D. and Spence M. Seeking a consensus on discharge communications with City and Hackney GPs. City and East London Medical Audit Advisory Group, London; 1998

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kalra D. Clinical Foundations and Information Architecture for the Implementation of a Federated Health Record Service. PhD Thesis. University of London, 2003 [Available from http://www.ehr.chime.ucl.ac.uk/docs/Kalra,%20Dipak%20(PhD%202002).pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kay S. and Marley T., Editors, Project Team 1-026. ENV 13606: EHCR Communications: Part 1 Electronic Healthcare Record Architecture. CEN TC/251, Stockholm; 1999

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lloyd D., Kalra D., Beale T., Maskens A., Dixon R., Ellis J., Camplin D., Grubb P., and Ingram D., Editors., The GEHR Final Architecture Description. European Commission, Brussels; 1995; The Good European Health Record Project: Deliverable 19. 11 chapters; 250 pages. Available from http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/HealthI/GEHR/EUCEN/del19.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  45. Markwell D. and others, Editors, Project Team 1-029. ENV 13606: EHCR Communications: Part 4 Messages for Exchange of Information. CEN TC/251, Stockholm; 1999

    Google Scholar 

  46. McKay H.G., Feil E.G., Glasgow R.E., and Brown J.E. Feasibility and use of an Internet support service for diabetes self-management. Diabetes Educator. 1998; 24:174–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Papagounos G. and Spyropoulos B. The multifarious function of medical records: ethical issues. Methods of Information in Medicine. Dec 1999; 38(4–5):317–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Patterson D., Ingram D., Kalra D. Information for Clinical Governance, In Clinical Governance: Making it Happen. The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd.; 1999. ISBN 1-85315-383-4

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pringle and Purves, Editors. ScopeEPR Project Report. Royal College of General Practitioners, London; 1997

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pringle M. Ensuring patient safety. Br J Gen Pract. Nov 2001; 51(472):876–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ramsaroop P. and Ball M.J. The “bank of health”. A model for more useful patient health records. MD Computing. Jul 2000–Aug 2000; 17(4):45–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Rector A.L., Nowlan W.A., Kay S., Goble C.A., and Howkins T.J. A framework for modelling the electronic medical record. Methods of Information in Medicine. Apr 1993; 32(2):109–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Richards T. Patients’ priorities. BMJ. Jan 1999; 318(7179):277–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Rogers R. Overcoming the barriers: national to European to G7. International Journal of Medical Informatics. Feb 1998; 48(1–3):33–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Rossi Mori A., Kalra D., Rodrigues J.M. and others, Editors, Project Team 1-027. ENV 13606: EHCR Communications: Part 2 Domain Termlist. CEN TC/251, Stockholm; 1999

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sackett D.L. and Straus S.E. Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the “evidence cart”. JAMA. Oct 1998; 280(15):1336–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Schloeffel P., Editor. Requirements for an Electronic Health Record Reference Architecture. ISO/TS 18308: 2002

    Google Scholar 

  58. Schloeffel P., Heard S., Beale T., and Rowed D. iThe Good Electronic Health Record (GEHR) in Australian General Practice. Toward an Electronic Health Record Europe’ 99. Nov 1999; 340–6

    Google Scholar 

  59. Schloeffel P., Lloyd D., Beale T., Ingram D., Heard S., and Kalra D. The openEHR Foundation [Web Page]. Accessed Nov 2004. Available at: http://www.openehr.org

    Google Scholar 

  60. Shortliffe E.H. The evolution of health-care records in the era of the Internet. Medinfo 9. 1998; 1Suppl:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  61. Slack W.V. Cybermedicine: how computing empowers patients for better health care. Medinfo 9. 1998; 1:3–5

    Google Scholar 

  62. Smith R. The future of healthcare systems. BMJ. May 1997; 314(7093):1495–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Sottile P.A., Ferrara F.M., Grimson W., Kalra D., and Scherrer J.R. The holistic healthcare information system. Toward an Electronic Health Record Europe’ 99. Nov 1999; 259–66

    Google Scholar 

  64. Southgate L. Professional competence in medicine. Hosp Med. Mar 1999; 60(3):203–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Southgate L., Berkson L., Fabb W., and others. Towards Better Definitions of Competence: a Paper From the Cambridge Conference. Office of the Regius Professor of Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge; 1989

    Google Scholar 

  66. Summerton N. Trends in negative defensive medicine within general practice. Br J Gen Pract. Jul 2000; 50(456):565–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Tange H.J. Consultation of medical narratives in the electronic medical record. Methods of Information in Medicine. Dec 1999; 38(4–5):289–93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Vincent C., Neale G., and Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. Mar 2001; 322(7285):517–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Waegemann C.P. Medical Record Institute’s survey of electronic health record trends and usage. Toward an Electronic Health Record Europe’ 99. Nov 1999; 147–58

    Google Scholar 

  70. Waegemann C.P. The five levels of electronic health records. MD Computing. May 1996–Jun 1996; 13(3):199–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Wagner M.M. and Hogan W.R. The accuracy of medication data in an outpatient electronic medical record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. May 1996–Jun 1996; 3(3):234–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Weed L.L. Clinical judgment revisited. Methods of Information in Medicine. Dec 1999; 38(4–5):279–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Williams J.G. and Morgan J. The clinician-information interface. Greenes R. A. and others, Editors. Medinfo 8. 1995; 801–5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional Education, UCL, London, UK

    Dipak Kalra & David Ingram

Authors
  1. Dipak Kalra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Ingram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. AGH University of Science & Technology, Kraków, Poland

    Krzysztof Zieliński

  2. Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland

    Mariusz Duplaga

  3. Centre for Health Informatics and Multi-professional Education, University College London, London, UK

    David Ingram

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kalra, D., Ingram, D. (2006). Electronic Health Records. In: Zieliński, K., Duplaga, M., Ingram, D. (eds) Information Technology Solutions for Healthcare. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-141-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-141-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-978-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-141-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation