Skip to main content

Three-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasound in Proctological Practice

  • Chapter
Complex Anorectal Disorders

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Law PJ and Bartram CI. Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomy. Gastrointestinal Radiol. 1989;14:349–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nielsen MB, Dammegaard L, and Pedersen JT. Endosonographic assessment of the anal sphincter after surgical reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:434–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Londono-Schimmer EE, Garcia-Duperly R, Nicholls RJ, Ritchie JK, Hanley PR, and Thompson JP. Overlapping anal sphincter repair for faecal incontinence due to sphincter trauma: 5-year follow-up functional results. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1994;9:110–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Oluff J, and Keighley MR. Anal sphincter defects: correlation between endoanal; ultrasound and surgery. Ann Surg. 1993;218:201–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, and Bartram CI. Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg. 1994;81:463–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schafer A, Enck P, Furst G, Kahn T, Freiling T, and Lubke HJ. Anatomy of the anal sphincters: comparison of endosonography to magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:777–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hussain SM, Stoker J, and Lameris JS. Anal sphincter complex: endoanal magnetic resonance imaging of normal anatomy. Radiology. 1995;197:671–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. deSouza NM, Puni R, Zbar A, Gilderdale DJ, Coutts GA, and Krausz T. MR imaging of the anal sphincter in multiparous women using an endoanal coil: correlation with in vitro anatomy and appearances in fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:1465–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rociu E, Stoker J, Zwamborn AW, and Lameris JS. Endoanal MR imaging of the anal sphincter in fecal incontinence. Radiographics. 1999;Suppl:S171–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Briel JW, Zimmerman DD, Stoker J, Rociu E, Lameris JS, Mooi WJ, and Schouten WR. Relationship between sphincter morphology on endoanal MRI and histopathological aspects of the external anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;15:87–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gold DM, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Humphries KN, Kamm MA, and Kmiot WA. 3-D endoanal sonography in assessing anal canal injury. Br J Surg. 1999;86:365–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Sultan AH, Bartram CI, and Nicholls RJ. Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1231–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pinedo G, Vaizey CJ, Nicholls RJ, Roach R, Halligan S, and Kamm MA. Results of repeat anal sphincter repair. Br J Surg. 1999;86:66–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams AB, Cheetham MJ, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, and Kmiot WA. Gender differences in the longitudinal pressure profile of the anal canal related to anatomical structure as demonstrated on threedimensional anal endosonography. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1674–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zbar AP and Beer-Gabel M. Gender differences in the longitudinal pressure profiule of the anal canal related to anatomical structure as demonstrated on three-dimensional anal endosonography. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1016.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Frenckner B and Euler CVR. Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut. 1975;16:482–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lestar B, Penninckx F, and Kerremans R. The composition of anal basal pressure: an in vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989;4:118–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zbar AP, Jayne DG, Mathur D, Ambrose NS, and Guillou PJ. The importance of the internal anal; sphincter (IAS) in maintaining continence: anatomical, physiological and pharmacological considerations. Colorectal Dis. 2000;2:193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fucini C, Elbetti C, and Messerini L. Anatomic plane of separation between external anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle: clinical implications. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:374–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zbar AP, Kmiot WA, Aslam M, Williams A, Hider A, Audisio RA, Chiappa AC, and deSouza NM. Use of vector volume manometry and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging in the adult female for assessment of anal sphincter dysfunction. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1411–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zbar AP, Aslam M, and Allgar V. Faecal incontinence after internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Tech Coloproctol. 2000;4:25–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zbar AP, Beer-Gabel M, Chiappa AC, and Aslam M. Fecal incontinence after minor anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1610–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams AB, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Marshall MM, Nicholls RJ, and Kmiot WA. Multiplanar anal endosonography-normal canal anatomy. Colorectal Dis. 2001;3:169–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Nicholls RJ, and Bartram CI. Endosonography of the anal sphincters: Normal anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol. 1994;49:368–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hussain SM, Stoker J, Zwamborn AW, et al. Endoanal MRI of the anal sphincter complex: correlation with cross-sectional anatomy and histology. J Anat. 1996;189:677–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Halverson AL and Hull TL. Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:345–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Sultan AH, Bartram CI, and Nicholls RJ. Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1231–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Enck P, Heyert T, Gantke B, et al. How reproducible are measures of the anal sphincter muscle diameter by endoanal ultrasound? Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:293–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, and Bartram CI. Primary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive faecal incontinence. Lancet. 1997;349:612–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zimmerman DDE. Diagnostik en bahnadlung van transsfincterische perianale fistels [Diagnosis and treatment of trans-sphincteric perianal fistulas] [thesis]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  31. West RI, Zimmerman DDE, Dwarkasing S, Hop WCJ, Hussaain SM, Schouten WR, Kuipers EJ, and Felt-Bersma RJ. Prospective comparison of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced 3-D endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal MR imaging of perianal fistulas. In: Zimmerman DDE, editor. Diagnostik en bahnadlung van transsfincterische perianale fistels [Diagnosis and treatment of trans-sphincteric perianal fistulas] [thesis]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University; 2003. p. 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Halligan S. Imaging fistula-in-ano [review]. Clin Radiol. 1998;53:85–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Orsoni P, Barthet M, Portier F, Panninck M, Desjeux A, and Grimaud JC. Prospective comparison of endosonography, MR imaging and surgical findings in anorectal fistula and abscesses complicating Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg. 1999;86:360–4. Comment: Zbar AP, deSouza NM. Br J Surg. 1999;86:1093-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zbar AP, deSouza NM, Puni R, and Kmiot WA. Comparison of endoanal magnetic resonance imaging with surgical findings in perirectal sepsis. Br J Surg. 1998;85:111–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kamm MA, Hoyle CH, Burleigh DE, Law PJ, Swash M, Martin JE, Nicholls RJ, and Northover JM. Hereditary internal anal sphincter myopathy causing proctalgia fugax and constipation. A newly defined condition. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:805–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zbar AP. Magnetic resonance imaging and the coloproctologist. Tech Coloproctol. 2001;5:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zbar, A.P., Frudinger, A. (2005). Three-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasound in Proctological Practice. In: Complex Anorectal Disorders. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-057-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-057-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-690-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-057-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics